-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:38:50PM -0300, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
> Hello All,
[...]
> It is well known that preforking is a good pratice if you want to
> achieve a higher performance.
> When I was asked about it I readily answered: "of course it do
On Thursday, August 14 at 07:01 AM, quoth Eric Toczek:
While it's not free, a really nice webmail that does a lot of smart
things (persistent imap connections, ldap connection pooling, and
one of the best interfaces I've seen) is Nitido's PIM
http://www.nitido.com/products/index.shtml?web_pim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:51:20 -0700, "Michael Carter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a developer on the Orbited project (http://www.orbited.org), which
> provides a TCPSocket interface in javascript (emulated over HTTP using
> ajax
> and comet.) This
Hello,
I'm a developer on the Orbited project (http://www.orbited.org), which
provides a TCPSocket interface in javascript (emulated over HTTP using ajax
and comet.) This TCPSocket allows true bi-directional communication between
a web browser and an arbitrary tcp server. One of the other develope
Hello all,
Today I had problems on one of the servers. Dovecot stopped working and
I got lots of "Request queue is full" on logs.
Aug 14 16:49:45 mailserver03 dovecot: auth(default):
ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Request queue is full
Aug 14 16:49:45 mailserver03 dovecot: auth(default):
ldap([EMAIL PR
On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
2008/8/14 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But there are even some theoretical problems with preforking. For
example
the most secure way to set up your users is to use a different UNIX
UID for
each user. So for preforking that means you
2008/8/14 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But there are even some theoretical problems with preforking. For example
> the most secure way to set up your users is to use a different UNIX UID for
> each user. So for preforking that means your preforked processes must run as
> root until they rec
On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:42 AM, Paul Gamble - MWEB wrote:
Aug 14 10:14:03 withnail dovecot: imap-login: MYPROXY pid=6516,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], method=PLAIN, rsock=127.0.0.1:48157,
lsock=127.0.0.1:1143, proto=IMAP, secured proxy([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
started proxying to 127.0.0.1:143/pgamble*master:
Aug
On Aug 14, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Andrew Von Cid wrote:
Either that or use a different UID for all users (or the staff
users). With ACLs you could create dovecot-acl file with either:
a) Listing all the users who have access to it and their permissions
b) List staff group's access, and have your u
On Aug 14, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Mike Hobbs wrote:
Sorry to bother everyone but I was wondering if it is possible for
Dovecot to handle mbox AND maildir at the same time?
Sure.
I'd like to use maildir with all my new users, but I'd like to be
able to continue using mbox for my old users and sl
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system
and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design.
I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail
processes, forking a new processes for each
Words by Giorgenes Gelatti [Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 04:46:04PM -0300]:
> Woa!!
>
> Do you have statistics of access/min for pop3?
>
No, but I 'greped' 2300 logins/minute peak for a given day for *IMAP*.
> Indeed it could be premature since I didn't measure any real
> bottleneck. Just something tha
Sorry to bother everyone but I was wondering if it is possible for
Dovecot to handle mbox AND maildir at the same time?
Example:
I want to convert from UW Imap using mbox to Dovecot using maildir.
Do I need to convert ALL my users mbox mailboxes to maildir right away
or can I convert them one
Woa!!
Do you have statistics of access/min for pop3?
Indeed it could be premature since I didn't measure any real
bottleneck. Just something that got my attention.
[]'s
giorgenes
2008/8/14 Jose Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Words by Giorgenes Gelatti [Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:38:50PM -0300]:
Words by Giorgenes Gelatti [Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:38:50PM -0300]:
> Hello All,
>
> I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system
> and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design.
> I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail
> processe
Hello All,
I've been studying dovecot for replacing my company's current system
and I got a little worried about an aspect of the dovecot's design.
I was surprised that dovecot doesn't use prefork for its mail
processes, forking a new processes for each new client connection.
Talking in the #dove
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 14, 2008, at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to modify mail messages when they are downloaded using a
special login.
In theory, yes.
eg. my normal login for dovecot is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when I
log in
using [EMAIL PROT
On Aug 14, 2008, at 11:12 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Is there a way to modify mail messages when they are downloaded
using a
special login.
In theory, yes.
eg. my normal login for dovecot is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when I
log in
using [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like
> You need to subscribe to the folders on the new server.
I find it just a few time after my mail but anyway thank you for your
answer !
begin:vcard
fn:Mathieu Kretchner
n:Kretchner;Mathieu
org:INRIA;Syslog
adr;dom:;;2007 route des lucioles - BP93;Sophia Antipolis;;06902 CEDEX
email;internet:[EMA
Is there a way to modify mail messages when they are downloaded using a
special login.
eg. my normal login for dovecot is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when I log in
using [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like to download my mail
which are processed using a Perl script. The Perl script will modify the
content of
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:42:49 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ed W a écrit :
>> Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
>>> kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my ex
On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Mike Abbott wrote:
I re-ran imaptest on an empty mail store, single client, multiple
users, using your dovecot-crlf input file, for a couple hours.
Here's the distribution of errors that imaptest reports:
100 Error: user%d[%d]: <...>: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
I re-ran imaptest on an empty mail store, single client, multiple
users, using your dovecot-crlf input file, for a couple hours. Here's
the distribution of errors that imaptest reports:
100 Error: user%d[%d]: <...>: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
167 Error: user%d[%d]: <...>: Header CC changed
On 8/13/2008, Mike Abbott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Post your dovecot -n output?
>
> Here's some of it. Not very enlightening.
Why just some of it? Its not like its that much, and what you may
*think* is irrelevant, may in fact be *very* relevant...
--
Best regards,
Charles
But Timo walks through the valley of the shadow for us all.so maybe he's
entitled.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yea, ...
I've been meaning to tell you that should be "Yeah" for an informal
version of "Yes", otherwise
Hi Timo,
Thanks for your reply.
How exactly are you changing virtual users' groups? You said you're
using a single UID and GID, so from the OS point of view there's only
a single user.
Makes sense.
Either that or use a different UID for all users (or the staff users).
With ACLs you could
Hi Timo,
Thanks for your reply.
How exactly are you changing virtual users' groups? You said you're
using a single UID and GID, so from the OS point of view there's only
a single user.
Makes sense.
Either that or use a different UID for all users (or the staff users).
With ACLs you could
Chris Wakelin wrote:
>
> Another persistent IMAP Webmail app may be Web-Alpine from UW, but I
> haven't tried it out yet. If it's expecting to be talking to UW-IMAP
> it'll need to use persistent connections!
>
While it's not free, a really nice webmail that does a lot of smart
things (persistent
>>> In any case I only have experience of dovecot and it's used in some
>>> larger installs such as the old webmail.us, now 1&1 (I believe). I
>>> think your installation is probably large enough that you might want to
>>> do a trial migration of a couple of accounts and see if migration is a
* Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ed W a écrit :
> > Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
> >> kbajwa a écrit :
> >>> Hello:
> >>>
> >>> I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
> >>> type of
> >>> support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
> >>>
> >>> Cyrus =
Ed W a écrit :
> Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
>> kbajwa a écrit :
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what
>>> type of
>>> support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
>>>
>>> Cyrus = 0
>>> Dovecot= 100
>>>
>>>
>>> My personal experience.
Hi Timo
Thanks very much, hadn't finished my morning coffee and already a patch
:)
The patch does the trick:
- My dovecot.conf for the proxy:
...
login_log_format_elements = pid=%p user=%u method=%m rsock=%r:%b
lsock=%l:%a proto=%s %c
login_log_format = MYPROXY %s %$:
...
- gives me, via
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list.
I'm just trying to have my own opinion of imap server and I already have
sarcastic answer on th
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:36 AM, Paul Gamble - MWEB wrote:
Is it possible for a Dovecot proxy's login process (IMAP and POP3) to
include the "destuser", i.e. the uid used to authenticate to the
backend
IMAP/POP3 server, in its logging? "%u" gives me the uid provided by
the
client of course, but
34 matches
Mail list logo
