[Dovecot] [PATCH] Support GSS-SPNEGO natively

2008-08-11 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm presenting it for discussion only, unless someone else can try it :) Modern versions of MIT kerberos support GSS

Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFS

2008-08-11 Thread Jeroen Koekkoek
I was afraid somebody was going to say that. Thanks for your reply, I'll try that sometime later this week. I'll report back how it all went. Kind regards, Jeroen Koekkoek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aria Stewart Sent: Monday, August 1

Re: [Dovecot] proxy_maybe and IPv6

2008-08-11 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Timo Sirainen wrote: On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Aug 11, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote: If an IPv4 address is specified as 'host', a dovecot proxy is created for clients connecting using IPv6 to this server, and symmetrically if the proxy is specified as an

[Dovecot] [PATCH] Allow GSSAPI to work with multihomed hosts

2008-08-11 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
I saw some past chatter on this in the list archives, but here is another stab and another rational. This patch follows a similar patch to openssh in that it allows any key in the specified keytab to match the incoming host key. This is necessary for multihomed hosts. See: https://bugzilla.mindrot

Re: [Dovecot] proxy_maybe and IPv6

2008-08-11 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Aug 11, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote: If an IPv4 address is specified as 'host', a dovecot proxy is created for clients connecting using IPv6 to this server, and symmetrically if the proxy is specified as an IPv6 address, client

Re: [Dovecot] proxy_maybe and IPv6

2008-08-11 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Aug 11, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote: If an IPv4 address is specified as 'host', a dovecot proxy is created for clients connecting using IPv6 to this server, and symmetrically if the proxy is specified as an IPv6 address, clients connecting through IPv4 will get forwarded to the

Re: [Dovecot] problems with sieve and lda

2008-08-11 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
On 11 Aug 2008 at 8:24, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > How are you calling deliver in postfix? Do you see in postfix's logs the > messages being handled to deliver? Well, I seem to have made the problem worse as I was adjusting settings throughout the day. Here's where I am at, if I now enabl

Re: [Dovecot] Auto Vacation replies again

2008-08-11 Thread Stephan Bosch
CJ Keist schreef: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fixed it!! In the file src/sieve_cmu.c line 744: smtp_client = smtp_client_open(src->addr, NULL, &f); change to: smtp_client = smtp_client_open(src->addr, src->fromaddr, &f); First of all, this does not control the content of t

Re: [Dovecot] Auto Vacation replies again

2008-08-11 Thread CJ Keist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fixed it!! In the file src/sieve_cmu.c line 744: smtp_client = smtp_client_open(src->addr, NULL, &f); change to: smtp_client = smtp_client_open(src->addr, src->fromaddr, &f); CJ Keist wrote: > Sorry to bring this up again. > > I have now configu

[Dovecot] Auto Vacation replies again

2008-08-11 Thread CJ Keist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry to bring this up again. I have now configured my test server to pass all email messages off to our central campus email filter gateway. This gateway scans all email traffic for viruses/spam before being delivered to any local mail servers. Once

Re: [Dovecot] problems with sieve and lda

2008-08-11 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
On 11 Aug 2008 at 6:35, Charles Marcus wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, sieve support has improved dramatically in the > latest versions (1.1.2 being the current). > > Use the atrpms repo... Sure, I see that in the version history, but that won't necessarily solve the current problem I am havin

Re: [Dovecot] problems with sieve and lda

2008-08-11 Thread Harondel J. Sibble
On 11 Aug 2008 at 8:24, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > To use -d ACCOUNT, you need a master socket where deliver looks up > user information: see the "Virtual Users" section in > http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA . But if you are not using virtual users > (and only used -d to test), you should not need

Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFS

2008-08-11 Thread Aria Stewart
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:57 AM, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote: I receive the following error message. Aug 7 09:38:51 mta2 dovecot: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): nfs_flush_fcntl: fcntl(/var/vmail/domain.tld/somebody/Maildir/dovecot.index, F_RDLCK) failed: Fu

Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFS

2008-08-11 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:57 AM, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote: I receive the following error message. Aug 7 09:38:51 mta2 dovecot: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): nfs_flush_fcntl: fcntl(/var/vmail/domain.tld/somebody/Maildir/dovecot.index, F_RDLCK) failed: Function not implemented Dovecot tries to flush kernel

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Mathieu Kretchner wrote: High Performance without hacking conf files ! http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning lists some of the things you can tune, but the defaults should be pretty good (although some default settings prefer reliability/security over perf

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Charles Marcus
On 8/11/2008, Mathieu Kretchner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: So here is my next environment : how many mailbox ? 5000 with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem how many users ? 6000 again - with adequate hardware/RAM, no problem Concurrent access/usage will dictate if you need more than one se

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Mathieu Kretchner
Charles Marcus a écrit : On 8/11/2008, Mathieu Kretchner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: But, at present, we need to have a secure / reliable / fast with all the properties that must fit a real e-mail server in order to support our new e-mail IMAP architecture, so the question is (because we have onl

[Dovecot] Good news for CPanel users

2008-08-11 Thread Marshal Newrock
In response to a feature request for cpanel to have native support for dovecot: Rudimentary support was added in 11.23. Full support for Dovecot will be available in 11.24. -- Marshal Newrock 517-679-0699 x223 FreedomBI, LLC - http://www.freedombi.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Charles Marcus
On 8/11/2008, Mathieu Kretchner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: But, at present, we need to have a secure / reliable / fast with all the properties that must fit a real e-mail server in order to support our new e-mail IMAP architecture, so the question is (because we have only 2 options) Why should I

[Dovecot] nombre de compte imap/ rapide rapide

2008-08-11 Thread Mathieu Kretchner
find . -type d -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 3 -print | sort | uniq | grep -vE "user$" | wc -l begin:vcard fn:Mathieu Kretchner n:Kretchner;Mathieu org:INRIA;Syslog adr;dom:;;2007 route des lucioles - BP93;Sophia Antipolis;;06902 CEDEX email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:04 92 38 76 67 x-mozilla-htm

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Mathieu Kretchner
Marcin Gryszkalis a écrit : On Monday of August 11 2008, Proskurin Kirill wrote: And Timo help a lot for many people in this list. Confirmed. Timo (and other users) doesn't leave any (non trivial) question unanswered, wiki is full of useful info, important bugs are fixed quick (follow mercur

[Dovecot] proxy_maybe and IPv6

2008-08-11 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Hi, Using dovecot 1.1.2 on a dual-stack server, with the 'proxy_maybe' attribute to forward some clients to another server, it seems that only clients connecting with the same protocol version as the one used by address in the 'host' attribute in the password db are recognized as local. If an IP

Re: [Dovecot] problems with sieve and lda

2008-08-11 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Harondel J. Sibble wrote: > Following the wiki here for system users > > http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix > > I never get any info in the logs about cmusieve, the only way I see anything > show up is if I add the transport settings to postfix/master.cf or see below > > >From reading the list ar

Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFS

2008-08-11 Thread Pawel Panek
From: "Ed W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 11:09 AM I'm also interested to hear how it works out? It appears that the straightline speed is high for gluster, but it's per file performance has enough overhead that it's a signficant problem for maildir type applications whi

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Marcin Gryszkalis
On Monday of August 11 2008, Proskurin Kirill wrote: > And Timo help a lot for many people in this list. Confirmed. Timo (and other users) doesn't leave any (non trivial) question unanswered, wiki is full of useful info, important bugs are fixed quick (follow mercurial repo) and new versions are

Re: [Dovecot] problems with sieve and lda

2008-08-11 Thread Charles Marcus
On 8/11/2008, Harondel J. Sibble ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 dovecot-sieve-1.0.2-6.el5 If I'm not mistaken, sieve support has improved dramatically in the latest versions (1.1.2 being the current). Use the atrpms repo... -- Best regards, Charles

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Mathieu Kretchner wrote: First of all : forgive me for my poor English Hello all, I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the only solutions that could fit our needs. Unfortunately I really don't know a lot about dovecot and I would like to have some of its assets.

Re: [Dovecot] Cyrus vs Dovecot

2008-08-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > First of all : forgive me for my poor English > > Hello all, > > I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the > only solutions that could fit our needs. > Unfortunately I really don't know a lot about dovecot and I would like to