Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 23:25 +0100, Ed W wrote:
Hi
+ deliver: Added -c parameter to provide path to delivered mail.
This allows maildir to save identical mails to multiple recipients
using hard links.
Funnily enough it was on my
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 16:04 -0700, Andrew Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > + deliver: Added -c parameter to provide path to delivered mail.
> > This allows maildir to save identical mails to multiple recipients
> > using hard links.
>
> According to
Well
Finally i found the error. It look like antispam is not compatible
with quota plugin.
mail_plugins = quota imap_quota autocreate antispam
If i remove quota and imap_quota plugins from imap protocol,
everything works fine and the message is saved in sent folder.
mail_plugins = autocreate an
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 23:25 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> Hi
>
> > + deliver: Added -c parameter to provide path to delivered mail.
> > This allows maildir to save identical mails to multiple recipients
> > using hard links.
> >
>
>
> Funnily enough it was on my todo list to whip up a
Hi
+ deliver: Added -c parameter to provide path to delivered mail.
This allows maildir to save identical mails to multiple recipients
using hard links.
Funnily enough it was on my todo list to whip up a small perl program to
go and scan my maildirs and figure
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc8.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc8.tar.gz.sig
I then decided to add the deliver -c feature to this release. Seems to
work in my tests, but who knows if it breaks something.. Although most
of the code is called only if -c par
* Patrick Ben Koetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Timo Sirainen :
> > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:16 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > > What I see is that the client seems to try to retrieve the same mails
> > > (retr=5/448621) over and over again.
> > >
> > > If they login using IMAP they don't ex
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.14.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.14.tar.gz.sig
Since v1.1.0 release is getting near, this could well be the last v1.0
release. I'll still fix important bugs, but if the bugfix is large or
affects only few people it'll probably get fi
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:50 -0400, Eric T wrote:
>
> >
> > Seems to work in my tests. Could you do a bit more with gdb:
Wonder why it worked :) Fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/d73cc550b389
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 13:48 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Jun 2 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> >Dovecot doesn't keep track of when flag changes have been done, so
> >there's no simple way to say "expunge messages which have been marked as
> >\Deleted after 7 days". With maildir you could ch
>
> Seems to work in my tests. Could you do a bit more with gdb:
>
>> #6 0x0812e512 in client_dict_connect (dict=0x819abc8)
>> at /var/tmp/dovecot-1.1.rc6/src/lib-dict/dict-client.c:268
>> query = 0x8178664 "D\206\027\b\003"
>
> fr 6
> p *dict
Program terminated
Hi All,
I have a pretty basic question - I'm just getting into this email business =).
There is a server that uses virtual users with dovecot. How could I go
by allowing the users to change their usernames and to let them save
all of their info? Access to the mailboxes is provided via
squirrelmai
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:49 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have gone through the patches that are used in the Fedora package and
> probably only the "mkcert-permissions" [1] can be considered to be
> included upstream. It is dated into package version 1.0-0.beta2.3, but I
> cannot find any pa
On Jun 2 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Dovecot doesn't keep track of when flag changes have been done, so
there's no simple way to say "expunge messages which have been marked as
\Deleted after 7 days". With maildir you could check the file's ctime,
but with mbox there's just no way.
We were toyi
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 20:26 -0400, Eric wrote:
> On Sun, 04 May 2008 17:50:45 +0300
> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A bit late reply, but you should be able to use a table exactly like
> > with quota (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict):
> >
>
>
> Just got around to trying this
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:50 +0200, arne van theemsche wrote:
> Hi
>
> We're in the phase of converting our existing unix-based users to
> virtual users.
>
> Goal is to make mail-spool totaly independent of home-spool. For that
> reason, NO files can be written to home.
> I've solved the problem
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 13:36 -0400, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I noticed today I checked a users mailbox with the mutt command:
>
> mutt -f /home/bob/email/
>
> There I saw he had 100 messages that had been deleted but not yet
> purged from his inbox so they're still using up disk storage on my
> em
on 6-2-2008 10:36 AM Carlos Williams spake the following:
I noticed today I checked a users mailbox with the mutt command:
mutt -f /home/bob/email/
There I saw he had 100 messages that had been deleted but not yet
purged from his inbox so they're still using up disk storage on my
email server.
I noticed today I checked a users mailbox with the mutt command:
mutt -f /home/bob/email/
There I saw he had 100 messages that had been deleted but not yet
purged from his inbox so they're still using up disk storage on my
email server.
My question is does Dovecot have a process to automatically
George Mamalakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question is as follows:
>Is there a way to call spamc from dovecot-LDA (and/or
> dovecot-sieve), or is there an alternate way to do this for a site
> with virtual mailboxes configured with dovecot-lda?
Hello,
I am currently running a simil
Hi Egbert,
thank you for your reply. I searched www.postfixvirtual.net, as you
suggested, with no luck. Their configuration differs significantly from
mine, since they are using CYRUS libraries in general, and not dovecot.
Moreover, the configuration that is proposed uses a vmail user (or some
George Mamalakis wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to setup a mail server using postfix (virtual_mailboxes),
spamassassin and dovecot, along with SQL where appropriate. From my
research so far I realized that, for several reasons, it is required
for me to use dovecot LDA instead of maildrop, local,
Hi
We're in the phase of converting our existing unix-based users to
virtual users.
Goal is to make mail-spool totaly independent of home-spool. For that
reason, NO files can be written to home.
I've solved the problem for all files, except for .dovecot.lda-dupes.
I can see in duplicate.c #
Hi all,
I am trying to setup a mail server using postfix (virtual_mailboxes),
spamassassin and dovecot, along with SQL where appropriate. From my
research so far I realized that, for several reasons, it is required for
me to use dovecot LDA instead of maildrop, local, procmail or other
altern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I also thought about this, but is it ever useful? Isn't the Received:
header
always different for different deliveries?
In sendmail the Recieved header is added when the mail comes in. Then it
is locally
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 13:10 +0200, Anders wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > Works with Sieve too.
>
> So, just to be sure, this patch will solve my problem described here:
> http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-March/029548.html ?
It should.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Works with Sieve too.
So, just to be sure, this patch will solve my problem described here:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-March/029548.html ?
Thanks,
Anders.
On Jun 2, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
The SHA1 idea took me:
If deliver calculates the hash for each mail, then hardlinks each
mail into, say, $HOME{target user}/../.inspool/{sha1_hash} (to
support if you have your users on different physical disks).
If the hash already exists
On Jun 2, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Anders wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/tmp/deliver-multiple.diff for Dovecot v1.1
implements
-p parameter for deliver, which reads the input mail from the
specified path instead of stdin. With maildir and hardlink copying
enabled, it also tries to
On Jun 2, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Christian Kuehn wrote:
Sometimes the compiled binary cannot read the existing and running
config, the dovecot -n results in:
ian:/opt/src/build/dovecot-1.1.rc7 # /opt/dovecot/sbin/dovecot -n #
1.1.rc7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
Error: Missing auth section for se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The SHA1 idea took me:
If deliver calculates the hash for each mail, then hardlinks each mail
into, say, $HOME{target user}/../.inspool/{sha1_hash} (to support if you
have your users on different physical d
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/tmp/deliver-multiple.diff for Dovecot v1.1 implements
> -p parameter for deliver, which reads the input mail from the
> specified path instead of stdin. With maildir and hardlink copying
> enabled, it also tries to hard link the file to destination instea
32 matches
Mail list logo
