Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 17:28 +0200, Anders wrote:
>> I am trying to use a master user. The login works. However, a LIST
>> command gives me only the INBOX. Is this to be expected? When logging in
>> normally, I do get the full list of folders.
>
> Your
On Friday 18 April 2008 18:56:08 Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 4/18/2008, Andreas Ntaflos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Is there anything Dovecot itself can do to reject or handle mail to
> > invalid virtual users?
>
> Not directly - the solution, as you surmised, earlier, is to use the
> same db bac
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 22:37 +0200, Anders wrote:
user_attrs =
uid=home=/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n,gosaMailQuota=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$M
Just drop the "uid", like: =home=/var/mail/..
Hi.
This is not documented, I think?
Anyway, it does not really work, I guess it might
On 4/18/2008, Andreas Ntaflos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there anything Dovecot itself can do to reject or handle mail to
invalid virtual users?
Not directly - the solution, as you surmised, earlier, is to use the
same db backend for your users.
Or does this situation *have* to be dealt
Seeing as Dovecot recognises when a virtual recipient is invalid, couldn't it
somehow put the to-be-rejected mail back to Postfix (or whichever MTA)? Or
should it just drop it? I don't know what the SMTP (whichevery protocol is to
be followed here) says about this, so I pose the question again
On Thursday 17 April 2008 23:50:40 mouss wrote:
> > But today I received spam mail (which was correctly identified as such by
> > amavisd-new) for "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", two
> > recipient addresses that do not exist. According to [1] "it's left up to
> > the non-Postfix delive
Hi,
based on the recent discussion by Bill Cole and Douglas Willcocks I've
quickly put together a PHP script which generates MD5 'contexts' for
Dovecot's password files:
http://www.noerenberg.de/hajo/pub/dovecot_hmacmd5.php.txt
The script has not been tested extensively, so use it on your
On Apr 18, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Joe Allesi -X (joallesi - Coyote Creek
Consulting at Cisco) wrote:
I have referred to the wiki and the RFC, but I still can't find the
exact answer I'm looking for. From what I know, Dovecot uses the IMAP
standard of 32 bit integers to uniquely identify messages.
A
On Apr 18, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Laurent Papier wrote:
Hi,
I have tested dovecot 1.1.rc4. I seems to works fine with my
configuration.
I have also tested the downgrade from 1.1rc4 to 1.0.10. It seems to
work fine
too expect the following messages.
Apr 15 14:46:44 dev dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROT
I have referred to the wiki and the RFC, but I still can't find the
exact answer I'm looking for. From what I know, Dovecot uses the IMAP
standard of 32 bit integers to uniquely identify messages.
After a message is deleted from the mbox, can this UID ever be reissued
to a new message or is that
Hi,
I have tested dovecot 1.1.rc4. I seems to works fine with my configuration.
I have also tested the downgrade from 1.1rc4 to 1.0.10. It seems to work fine
too expect the following messages.
Apr 15 14:46:44 dev dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Fixing header counts in
index /data/mail/gretel.c
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 08:12 -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
> > BTW: Do you use any sort of firewall, iptables or whatsoever on the mail,
> > dns or ldap server? Did you disabled it?
>
> LDAP and IMAP are on the same server. Since the query and the result
> both show up in the LDAP logs, it co
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:10 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> I got the impression that this is problem, see the Doc:
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP
>
> pass_attrs = uid=user,userPassword=password
>
> This is the default, please add "mail=user" to your pass_attrs and re-add
> auth_b
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I can see a large number of processes named "imap", some users have more
than 12 such processes running. Is such a large number per user a
"normal" behaviour ?
It's probably normal. Each connection is handled by a separate imap
process currently, and many clients can crea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:43:37AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Hey Timo,
>
> I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way
> postfix does something [...]
[last config item should win]
FWIW I was just bitten by something l
Citando Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 19:10 +0800, k bah wrote:
That didn't work for me:
..
using dovecot-1.0.5-6 on OpenSuSE 10.3.
It works only with v1.1. I thought you were using it, because:
gosaMailQuota=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$M
%$ works also only in v1.1.
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 06:43 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Postfix:
> If postfix encounters the same setting defined more than once, the last
> one wins.
This is how Dovecot also works, just tested..
> Dovecot:
> If dovecot encounters the same setting defined more than once it gives
> an error
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 19:10 +0800, k bah wrote:
> That didn't work for me:
..
> using dovecot-1.0.5-6 on OpenSuSE 10.3.
It works only with v1.1. I thought you were using it, because:
> gosaMailQuota=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$M
%$ works also only in v1.1..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
That didn't work for me:
user_attrs = =home=/var/dovecot-test/home/%n,uid=user (at
/etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf)
( /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: mail_location =
mbox:/var/dovecot-test/data/%n~%d:INBOX=/var/dovecot-test/%n~%d:INDEX=/var/dovecot-test-no-quotas/index/%n~%d
)
neither:
user_att
Hey Timo,
I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way
postfix does something - in this case, the way it reads its config file
when starting up.
Current behavior:
Postfix:
If postfix encounters the same setting defined more than once, the last
one wins.
Dovecot:
I
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 17:20 +0200, Albert Dengg wrote:
> hi
>
> i have a strange problem with my dovecot installtion:
> i configured it to accept digest-md5 authentication only but for some
> reason mailclients (i tried mutt and thunderbird so far) want to log
> with PLAIN (which fails of course).
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 16:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seems there is a bug in 1.1-rc4 in regards to sieve/managesieve, this
> problem goes away if I downgrade to 1.0.13.
Since it's not logging "Using sieve path" it most likely means it
doesn't find Sieve script. Could you patch your Sieve
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 15:48 +0200, Claude Frantz wrote:
> My system is very slow, the Maildir is mounted via NFS, the index is on
> a local disk system.
>
> In the config, there is:
>
> max_mail_processes = 3000
> login_processes_count = 6
> login_max_processes_count = 1500
>
> I can see a larg
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 12:18 -0400, Alan Ferrency wrote:
> I expect this is the reality of the situation: some port-scanner or
> something somewhere is occasionally hitting the server enough to
> increase the pop3-login process count, but nothing ever uses them
> after that.
>
> The processes aren
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 12:58 -0500, Stacy Trippe wrote:
> I am not sure where to go to troubleshoot Dovecot LDA...and how to turn
> up/down the verbosity of debug messages (albeit now I am logging the deliver
> info to /var/log/dovecot-deliver.log).
mail_debug=yes gives more information.
> dovecot
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:40 +0100, Ruud Boon wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I hope I'm using the right mailing for a feature request. I'm using
> dovecot on my server for a year now and I'm very happy
> with it. Its extremely stable and fast.
> Ok what is my situation why I'm asking a feature..
>
> Users are
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 00:17 -0700, John Temples wrote:
> When an IDLE command is active, Dovecot sends an OK every two minutes.
> Is it possible to disable this? I'm trying to eliminate unnecessary
> traffic on a link that's charged by the kilobyte.
It's easy to disable by modifying the sources,
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 09:19 +0200, Sven Schmidt wrote:
> Hi!
> I used "auth_debug=yes" and "auth_debug_passwords=yes". But I only see
> connects and disconnects:
> Apr 11 09:17:43 dovecot: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Disconnected: Logged out
> top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0
That means the clien
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 11:06 +0100, Guy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just been told that I need to make our mail server cater to
> accounts with single quotes.
> Has anyone set dovecot up to do this or know of any
> documentation/howto on it, assuming it's possible at all.
Shouldn't be a problem at least
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 06:56 -0600, Peter Van den Wildenbergh wrote:
> Can't_open_log_file_/var/log/dovecot.log:_Permission_denied/
> status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> status: exiting
>
> permission on /var/log/dovecot.log =
> -rw-r--r-- 1 vmail vmail 728 2008-04-10 21:36 /var/log/dovecot.log
I gue
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 23:07 -0400, Dave wrote:
> mail_location: maildir:/home/vmail/%d/%u
..
> Apr 11 23:48:17 s15298471 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=,
> method=PLAIN, rip=66.139.186.37, lip=74.208.64.129, TLS
> Apr 11 23:48:17 s15298471 dovecot: POP3(user): stat(/home/vmail//user/cur)
> fail
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 17:28 +0200, Anders wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> I am trying to use a master user. The login works. However, a LIST
> command gives me only the INBOX. Is this to be expected? When logging in
> normally, I do get the full list of folders.
Your configuration is somehow wrong th
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 21:38 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any plans to support cross compiling? Or
> have any of you succeed with cross compiling
> Dovecot?
Not really a priority for me, but someone apparently has managed to do
it:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-December
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 22:00 +0200, Patrick Fischer wrote:
> The problem is that, if a user move an email out of the email pool, the
> other users still can see the mail in the pool.
> It takes a long time to remove the mail from the pool for every user.
> Move TO the pool works immediatley.
> The
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 19:59 -0600, Joel Johnson wrote:
> I burned some time yesterday over a documentation inconsistency.
>
> The dovecot-example.conf file shipped with dovecot (checked with 1.1rc4 and
> the April 3 nightly), includes an indication at the top that the commented
> values listed are
No, that's a typo.
Wouter
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Asheesh
Laroia
Verzonden: vrijdag 18 april 2008 9:24
Aan: Wouter Amsterdam
CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Sieve script executed, but nothing happens
On Fri, 18 Apr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Gavin Henry wrote:
So why is dovecot searching for uid? I am not asking it to; in fact, my
pass_attrs field is empty.
Im' no tsure, I was hoping someone else would know why. Is it a hard coded
default?
Also,
Mauro Sanna wrote:
Il giorno gio, 17/04/2008 alle 07.58 -0500, Jack McKinney ha scritto:
While I am still having trouble getting LDAP to work with dovecot, I
have successfully solved this particular problem.
My users login with their emails. The correct search base for
"[EMAIL P
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Wouter Amsterdam wrote:
if address :is "to" "user@ mydomain.nl" {
Is this space intentional? "usermydomain.nl"?
-- Asheesh.
--
"In the long run, every program becomes rococo, and then rubble."
-- Alan Perlis
Hi all,
I think I have almost solved my dovecot-deliver lookup problems, but now
sieve still fails to work. From deliver's logfile I can tell the user's
homedir is found and the sieve script is executed, but not as expected. My
sieve testscript is very basic:
/home/virtual/user.dovecot.siev
Il giorno gio, 17/04/2008 alle 07.58 -0500, Jack McKinney ha scritto:
> While I am still having trouble getting LDAP to work with dovecot, I
> have successfully solved this particular problem.
> My users login with their emails. The correct search base for
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is "ou
41 matches
Mail list logo
