Scott Silva wrote:
That is the experience I had when 1.0.0 stable came out. And newer
versions were even better, but not as dramatic an increase in speed.
Most people here probably won't notice the speed, but my server does. I've
yet to see any mailbox select/index take more than 8% CPU for
on 3-17-2008 3:54 PM Curtis Maloney spake the following:
So, I _finally_ got the time to upgrade from 0.99.14 ... which I told
myself I'd upgrade from once 1.0 was released... (yep, I've been _that_
busy :)
So I read the Wiki page on 0.99->1.0 transition, and went through the
config file - fo
So, I _finally_ got the time to upgrade from 0.99.14 ... which I told myself
I'd upgrade from once 1.0 was released... (yep, I've been _that_ busy :)
So I read the Wiki page on 0.99->1.0 transition, and went through the config
file - for all of about 5 or 10 minutes.
I logged in at 11pm when
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
I've been slowly moving our site in the direction of using the Dovecot
LDA to deliver mail. Is there a way (via a plugin, maybe?) to get the
LDA to mark mail as "read" when it is delivered?
You can do this with Sieve, at least (imapflags, \\seen).
Anders.
Hello,
One of my users wants to be able to deliver email (e.g. via a procmail
script) and mark it *read* when it's delivered. We use Maildir as our
mail storage format. I have a bit of a hack script put together that
will do it by directly manipulating the Maildir (it delivers the email
using
RFC3028 say:
Folding of long header lines (as described in [IMAIL] 3.4.8) is
removed prior to interpretation of the data. The folding syntax (the
CRLF that ends a line plus any leading whitespace at the beginning of
the next line that indicates folding) are interpreted as if they wer
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/15/2008, Wojtek Bogusz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
i am using version 1.0.rc17
upgrade...very old...
hi. thanks. i upgraded to version 1.0.13 and it changes nothing in the
problem. let me quote the /var/log/mail.info and config files below. i
would be really grate
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Andy Greenwood wrote:
I'm relatively new to Dovecot, but I really like what I'm seeing so far. I
have one problem that I was hoping you could help me with though. I use
Postfix for my mail server, then pass that on to procmail for filtering, and
finally to deliver to put t
Hi all.
I'm relatively new to Dovecot, but I really like what I'm seeing so far.
I have one problem that I was hoping you could help me with though. I
use Postfix for my mail server, then pass that on to procmail for
filtering, and finally to deliver to put the mail in the appropriate
Maildir
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:45 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I know about
> > mail_max_userip_connections in dovecot 1.1
>
> It should be pretty easy to patch this code to ignore the user and just
> limit IPs. You could basically just remove "user" from struct
> mail_process_group and fix the cod
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 01:47 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I want to manage mail server resource part (like it can CGP) and with it
> I have one question. Is any way to limit overall max simultaneous
> connections to imap/pop3 server from one(each) host, except use
> iptable
alex_dovecot wrote:
hi,all
I read some part of the source code for studying and interesting. But i face trouble when I read the 'deliver.c'.
In file 'deliver.c' on line 812 , there is a function named 'deliver_mail',
see below:
deliver_mail(storage, mail, destination, mailbox)
12 matches
Mail list logo
