Many good suggestions and comments. But while I was trying to do it right
(silly me), the brass hat got it working with whatever is on the phone and I am
told that everything is fine (until it isn't).
Thanks to all who responded
--
Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resour
On Mar 14, 2008, at 7:43 PM, Ed W wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Virtual mailbox support can be tested with:
Could an extension of this idea sort out the mismash of default
names used by clients for standard folders, eg alias "Sent" <=>
"Sent Items" so that at the server level we can set a
On 3/14/2008, Ed W ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Could an extension of this idea sort out the mismash of default names
used by clients for standard folders, eg alias "Sent" <=> "Sent
Items" so that at the server level we can set an option and two
stupid clients with different defaults will "do the
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Virtual mailbox support can be tested with:
Could an extension of this idea sort out the mismash of default names
used by clients for standard folders, eg alias "Sent" <=> "Sent Items"
so that at the server level we can set an option and two stupid clients
with diffe
You might consider how to direct your needy users to a mail server
instance that has Maildir. If you are afraid, or its difficult to
wedge this into your current setup, you could have a completely
different mail server host their mail, and you could use a MX server
and/or a perdition IMAP
QRESYNC would require keeping track of expunges. This could be
implemented by just going through records in log files to find out what
messages have been expunged since the given modseq (= log seq+offset).
Although I'm not sure if it would be better to have a separate expunge
log. To allow rarel
It would be nice to be able to do 'dovecot -d' that outputs only/all of
the 'default' values of the currently running version, regardless of
what is explicitly set.
Postfix currently has this option, and it is very useful for one
thing... to compare settings that have been explicitly set to wh
On Mar 14, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Anders wrote:
I have a simple Sieve rule to protect me from accidentally deleting
mail:
fileinto :copy "backup";
Should I expect this backup to be hardlinked to the ordinary one?
Obviously, that would make the backup be almost for free in terms of
storage, but c
I have a simple Sieve rule to protect me from accidentally deleting mail:
fileinto :copy "backup";
Should I expect this backup to be hardlinked to the ordinary one?
Obviously, that would make the backup be almost for free in terms of
storage, but currently I do not see any linking.
Using Maild
On 3/13/2008, Scott Silva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I just tried to do a mass move
Define 'mass move'...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Virtual mailbox support can be tested with:
hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-virtualboxes/
The code is still pretty non-optimized and I've only done some small
tests, but at least it appears to work. Messages can't yet saved to
virtual mailboxes, but I was thinking that the first configured
On 3/13/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Mar 6 09:05:48 mercury mail:info imapd[970952]: Killed (lost
mailbox lock) user =x host=cpe-24-161-103-11.hvc.res.rr.com
[24.161.103.11]
Those are UW-IMAP messages! Dovecot doesn't kill connections over a
mbox lock.
Ouch... so, two
12 matches
Mail list logo
