On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 08:56 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I've finally added support for "normal" command/reply tests for my
> imaptest program (http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest).
And added more features to it. The only things in TODO list for it are:
- BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (...)] should be conve
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2008 schrieb Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo:
> > In case of 1.0.10, just take the prepared ready-to-install .deb from
> > backports.
> Does this backport package has quota available?
Mh, sorry, I've no idea.
Maybe someone on the mailing list can give a definitive answer.
Gree
on 2-28-2008 1:53 PM Eugene spake the following:
Hi people!
I just switched one of my servers from Courier to Dovecot. Planned to do it
anyway but had to do it faster after the discovery that courier [the
version
I had installed, at least] returns malformed headers for a few messages,
causing
Hi people!
I just switched one of my servers from Courier to Dovecot. Planned to do it
anyway but had to do it faster after the discovery that courier [the version
I had installed, at least] returns malformed headers for a few messages,
causing Outlook Express to completely ignore them. Curiously
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>
>
> Since /etc/procmailrc is executed as root typically, you probably need to
> make this the first line of it:
>
> DROPPRIVS=YES
>
> At least, that's what I have, and that's my recollection of my reason. (-:
>
> -- Asheesh.
That appears to have done t
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Thanks for the information. I have one additional question, it is
probably not a Dovecot question more of a Procmail question. I tried
adding the above code to my /etc/procmailrc file but it did not work. Do
I have to put that code in each users .proc
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2008 schrieb Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo:
> Does
> anybody has compilled dovecot on debian etch with inotify?
> HOW??
Do you want to use Dovecot 1.0 or 1.1rc?
In case of 1.0.10, just take the prepared ready-to-install .deb from
backports.
Greetings,
Gunter
--
*** Pow
on 2-28-2008 10:02 AM Scott Bruce spake the following:
Hello,
I have got it working using
convert_mail = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
and it converts fine to maildir.
The one problem that I am having now is that client downloads some of
the emails again, after conversion.
Let me described th
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
>>>
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
>>>
>>> There shouldn't be Maildir in there. deliver reads dovecot.conf to
>>> f
Hello,
I have got it working using
convert_mail = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
and it converts fine to maildir.
The one problem that I am having now is that client downloads some of
the emails again, after conversion.
Let me described the situation,
I'm trying to migrate from qpopper pop3 to
Hi there,
I'm happily using dovecot, and today tried to integrate
the antispam imap plugin to automatically train/inform the
crm114 spam classifier when moving messages in and out of
folder "SPAM"
However, when i try to move a message to folder spam,
my client (Thunderbirds) says:
The current
On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:25 AM, Andy Dills wrote:
I don't think locking is an issue. NFS caching is more problematic.
But with
v1.1's mail_nfs_*=yes settings there should be no problems with
storing
indexes on NFS.
That's good to know. Do you view 1.1 as production ready now, or
should I
w
On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Carsten Henkel wrote:
DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
:0 w
| $DELIVER Maildir
There shouldn't be Maildir in there. deliver reads dovecot.conf to
figure out where your mails are l
On Feb 28, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Ed W wrote:
Anyone using either Glusterfs or DRBD in their mail setup? How is
performance, manageability? Problems? Tips?
I tried GlusterFS and found some bugs from it. One of them was at
least fixed (locking issues with 64bit systems). Also GlusterFS has
Does
anybody has compilled dovecot on debian etch with inotify?
HOW??
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Charles Marcus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Berg, on 2/28/2008 11:08 AM, said the following:
>
>
> > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:05 +0100, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> >> Thanks
Johannes Berg, on 2/28/2008 11:08 AM, said the following:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:05 +0100, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
Thanks for the link now I know about inotify & dnotify, but what do
they have to do with dovecot ? do I need them?
They're used to implement IDLE in an optimised fashion. Y
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:05 +0100, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> Thanks for the link now I know about inotify & dnotify, but what do
> they have to do with dovecot ? do I need them?
They're used to implement IDLE in an optimised fashion. Yes, you do want
them.
johannes
signature.asc
Descriptio
Thanks for the link now I know about inotify & dnotify, but what do
they have to do with dovecot ? do I need them?
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Ntaflos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 14:20:14 Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> > Hi, I am compiling doveco
On Thursday 28 February 2008 14:20:14 Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo wrote:
> Hi, I am compiling dovecot and I found dnotify & inotify. What does
> dnotify or inotify do ? do i need it.
> Thanks
Why not have a look at the Wikipedia articles on the topic and search onward
from there if you want to know mor
Hi, I am compiling dovecot and I found dnotify & inotify. What does
dnotify or inotify do ? do i need it.
Thanks
Anyone using either Glusterfs or DRBD in their mail setup? How is
performance, manageability? Problems? Tips?
Ed W
I tried to use Glusterfs (1.3.7) on mail cluster (qmail + dovecot), but for
me it was terrifying mistake. The cluster is serving about 1,5k mail
accounts. It was slow, unre
Philipp Kolmann wrote:
Ed W wrote:
> Anyone using either Glusterfs or DRBD in their mail setup? How is
> performance, manageability? Problems? Tips?
I have DRBD below IMAP and it works nice for 20 accounts.
A collegue has the student POP3/IMAP Server here with a 2.9 TB DRBD
slice and dove
Ed W wrote:
> Anyone using either Glusterfs or DRBD in their mail setup? How is
> performance, manageability? Problems? Tips?
I have DRBD below IMAP and it works nice for 20 accounts.
A collegue has the student POP3/IMAP Server here with a 2.9 TB DRBD
slice and dovecot on it with no other se
Anyone using either Glusterfs or DRBD in their mail setup? How is
performance, manageability? Problems? Tips?
Ed W
24 matches
Mail list logo
