Hello,
i just tested imaps with 5 altnames in ms outlook and works ok
(problem was unknown CA). Kmail seems working too. But need more
testing. There will be some "old" clients which will not support this
feature.
I found http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/VhostTaskForce where is lot explained.
2008/2/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Anders wrote:
Okay, no help for having an optional include. My fallback solution is to
Well, it's all open source, did you look at it? It shouldn't be too hard
to just ignore the result of include, no?
create the personal s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jose Celestino wrote:
It is possible to get a certificate with a "Subject Alternative Names"
containing the various hostnames pointing to the same machine.
I have very poor experience with such certificates in both https and
Hi there,
After being extremely impressed from implementing it in some customer
installations, I've decided to migrate our mail infrastructure to dovecot.
Being able to have /bin/checkpassword support across the board for pop,
imap, and smtp authentication, as well as being able to ditch stunn
Hello,
can you post test results please after testing? When should be tests done ?
I think that some clients (like pda maybe outlook) will fail, but i
don't start flame, will wait for results.
Thank you.
2008/2/27, Jose Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Words by Lampa [Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:41
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:21 -0800, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Patrick wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone has IMAP working between Dovecot 1.0.10 and a
> > Nokia N95 (8GB version with firmware 15.x.x.x)? I've been trying to make
> > it work using a default Dovecot config but
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 16:49 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 14:15 +0100, Patrick wrote:
> > In wireshark all I see are a bunch of TCP transmissions over
> > and over from the Dovecot server to the N95 and the N95 just sits there.
>
> What commands/replies?
Tomorrow I'll make
Anders wrote:
I (think that I) want a global Sieve setup like this:
require ["include"];
include :global "spam.sieve";
include :personal "folders.sieve";
include :personal "vacation.sieve";
Okay, no help for having an optional include. My fallback solution is to
create the personal s
Words by Lampa [Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:41:00PM +0100]:
> Hello,
>
> so it's possible to do it in other way ?
>
> Starting dovecot with different config (bind different ip adress and
> different certificates) ? Is possible with -c option. If is possible
> what must change in config (will be base_
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 22:41 +0100, Lampa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> so it's possible to do it in other way ?
>
> Starting dovecot with different config (bind different ip adress and
> different certificates) ? Is possible with -c option.
Sure, that'll work.
> If is possible
> what must change in conf
Hello,
so it's possible to do it in other way ?
Starting dovecot with different config (bind different ip adress and
different certificates) ? Is possible with -c option. If is possible
what must change in config (will be base_dir enough, or will be
problem that other directives stay same for all
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 21:45 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Well, almost. The perpetrator gets too many warnings:
> >
> > Feb 26 20:02:13 postamt quota-warning(pwerner) 95%: delivered to
> > /home/p/w/pwerner/Maildir/new/1204052533.25022.postamt.charite.d
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 19:51 +0100, Lampa wrote:
> is possible in some way use on each ip address different certificate
Unfortunately not. Probably will have to wait until v2.0.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:56 -0500, Philip J. Hollenback wrote:
> server dovecot: IMAP(user): Our dotlock file
> /home/user/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist.lock was overridden (kept it 0 secs)
..
> server dovecot: IMAP(user): dotlock /home/user/Maildir/dovecot.index.log.lock
> was immediately recreated un
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:56 -0500, Philip J. Hollenback wrote:
> I've recently upgraded to 1.0.10 in hopes that this problem would go
> away but no luck. I've got some users at my company with large
> inboxes on maildir (say 22,000 messages). Their mailboxes are hosted
> on nfs and dovecot is con
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 21:45 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Well, almost. The perpetrator gets too many warnings:
>
> Feb 26 20:02:13 postamt quota-warning(pwerner) 95%: delivered to
> /home/p/w/pwerner/Maildir/new/1204052533.25022.postamt.charite.de,S=2084
> Feb 26 20:02:54 postamt quota-warnin
I've recently upgraded to 1.0.10 in hopes that this problem would go
away but no luck. I've got some users at my company with large
inboxes on maildir (say 22,000 messages). Their mailboxes are hosted
on nfs and dovecot is configured to do dotlocking. Still I see
messages like this continually i
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > >
> >
> > Pretty big change, hopefully didn't break anything:
> >
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/9e4c26471b19
>
> You Da Man!
>
> Feb 26 15:51:18 postamt quota-warning: invoked
> Feb 26 15:51:18 po
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Patrick wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has IMAP working between Dovecot 1.0.10 and a
Nokia N95 (8GB version with firmware 15.x.x.x)? I've been trying to make
it work using a default Dovecot config but the N95 just hangs when
updating the folder list which has a bunch of ne
Hello,
is possible in some way use on each ip address different certificate
(for imap, for pop3). There are options like (but that is not enough
for me):
protocol imap {
listen = *:10143
ssl_listen = *:10943
..
}
protocol pop3 {
listen = *:10100
..
}
I have server for 4 domains (each has o
The locking issue is on the mbox files. When it happens, I get a bunch
procmail processes backing up waiting for the lock.
The filesystem is reiserfs (version 3).
The NFS server is debian sarge box (which will be going to etch this
weekend). And its using the nfs-kernel-server.
The dead lo
As a follow-up on this, these two lines also helped me to compile the 1.1rc1
on gcc 2.96:
diff -ru dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c
dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib/str-find.c
--- dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c Tue Oct 23 16:01:16 2007
+++ dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:03 -0500, John Gray wrote:
> I run into lock deadlocks if I run dovecot over nfs
As Aaron asked, it would be useful to strace the process to see what
exactly is waiting: mbox file or index files, dotlocking or fcntl
locking.
> Sometimes I can kill all the processes, remov
A few questions...
1. What are you running as the underlying FS for your NFS share?
2. What are you using for the NFS server?
3. Do you see any messages about lockd in your messages file?
4. When you strace a deadlocked process, what do you see?
5. Do these locks appear to deadlock on the sam
I'm running Dovecot 1.1 RC1. I believe I've done all the due diligence
for making things working correctly over nfs. But I run into locking
issues if I run over nfs.
procmail is doing the delivery over nfs. uw-imap was ruining over nfs.
dovecot is fine if its on the nfs server (i.e. it has
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
>
> Pretty big change, hopefully didn't break anything:
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/9e4c26471b19
You Da Man!
Feb 26 15:51:18 postamt quota-warning: invoked
Feb 26 15:51:18 postamt quota-warning(ayahyaza) 95%: delivered
:)
--
Ralf Hilde
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 14:15 +0100, Patrick wrote:
> In wireshark all I see are a bunch of TCP transmissions over
> and over from the Dovecot server to the N95 and the N95 just sits there.
What commands/replies?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 14:05 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * users have 500M usually
> * except I manually edit their HOME/Maildir/maildirsize
quota_rule = ?:storage=500M
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/a39b16b0a530
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 14:23 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > I thought the rest would be fetched from $HOME/Maildir/maildirsize!!
> >
> > Now that I looked at the code, surprisingly it does. :)
>
> Hussa! (because THAT part works)
>
> > But this is
CRYPT and MD5-CRYPT are compatible in pretty much all operating systems.
You could just make CRYPT your default password scheme and it'll work
for both.
I did not know that. But it works!
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dins
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I thought the rest would be fetched from $HOME/Maildir/maildirsize!!
>
> Now that I looked at the code, surprisingly it does. :)
Hussa! (because THAT part works)
> But this is also the reason why the quota warnings don't work.
> They calculate the pe
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 14:05 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > > Using:
> > > quota: maildir
> > > quota_rule: Trash:storage=100M
> > > quota_warning: storage=90%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
> > > quota_warning2: storage=95%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
> > > quota_warnin
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has IMAP working between Dovecot 1.0.10 and a
Nokia N95 (8GB version with firmware 15.x.x.x)? I've been trying to make
it work using a default Dovecot config but the N95 just hangs when
updating the folder list which has a bunch of nested folders. So I made
a new test
Mauro Sanna, on 2/26/2008 7:36 AM, said the following:
What are the bugs in version 1.0-rc15-2?
I have no idea...
I run it since etch has been released and it work without problems for
me.
If you are content to run old, pre-release software that is known to be
buggy, by all means, do so. J
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 22:01 +0100, Anders wrote:
> I did a little too much copy/paste, and ended up with an ldap config
> file containing a line of the form
>
> user_filter = user_filter = (&objectClass=...
>
> (with "user_filter =" repeated). This caused the auth process to
> segfault (v1.1.rc
> > Using:
> > quota: maildir
> > quota_rule: Trash:storage=100M
> > quota_warning: storage=90%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
> > quota_warning2: storage=95%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
> > quota_warning3: storage=99%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 99
> > now :)
>
> Ar
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:27 +0100, Jan van den Berg wrote:
> This works; however I noticed because of history a lot of my users still
> have a CRYPT password (not a MD5-CRYPT password). Now I get these
> errors:
CRYPT and MD5-CRYPT are compatible in pretty much all operating systems.
You could jus
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It means you've compiled dovecot with --enable-debug.
Yes, true.
> It's mainly useful for developers and it gives these kind of "useless"
> warnings.
Argh. I will remove it.
> In this case it might be better to increase the pool's initial size so
> it do
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:37 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Using:
> quota: maildir
> quota_rule: Trash:storage=100M
> quota_warning: storage=90%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
> quota_warning2: storage=95%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
> quota_warning3: storage=99%% /usr/lo
* Mauro Sanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Using:
> > quota: maildir
> > quota_rule: Trash:storage=100M
> > quota_warning: storage=90%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
> > quota_warning2: storage=95%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
> > quota_warning3: storage=99%% /usr/local/scripts/
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:13 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >From my log:
>
> Feb 25 14:53:26 postamt postfix/local[22546]: 0EAA8220697: to=<[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, relay=local, delay=0.61,
> delays=0.16/0.04/0/0.42, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced (permission denied.
> Command output: Warning: Growing
> Using:
> quota: maildir
> quota_rule: Trash:storage=100M
> quota_warning: storage=90%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
> quota_warning2: storage=95%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
> quota_warning3: storage=99%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 99
> now :)
>
Scuse me butqu
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 10:08 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > quota_warning: storage=10%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
> > quota_warning2: storage=5%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
> > quota_warning3: storage=1%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-wa
Il giorno mar, 26/02/2008 alle 07.10 -0500, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
> On 2/26/2008, Mauro Sanna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> This is very old and buggy, please upgrade... current release is
> >> 1.0.10, but 1.1 is getting close (its at rc1 now)...
>
> > It is old yes, but debian etch has t
Hi,
right now I have
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
in my dovecot-sql-auth.conf file.
This works; however I noticed because of history a lot of my users still
have a CRYPT password (not a MD5-CRYPT password). Now I get these
errors:
dovecot: Feb 26 13:08:17 Info: auth-worker(d
On 2/26/2008, Mauro Sanna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is very old and buggy, please upgrade... current release is
1.0.10, but 1.1 is getting close (its at rc1 now)...
It is old yes, but debian etch has this version.
Ever heard of backports?
http://packages.debian.org/etch-backports/dove
Il giorno lun, 25/02/2008 alle 06.04 -0500, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
> On 2/25/2008, Vusi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I'm using Dovecot 1.0.rc15
>
> This is very old and buggy, please upgrade... current release is 1.0.10,
> but 1.1 is getting close (its at rc1 now)...
It is old yes, but de
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 10:08 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> quota_warning: storage=10%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
> quota_warning2: storage=5%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
> quota_warning3: storage=1%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 99
In your previous mail you asked abo
from dovecot -n:
plugin:
fts: squat
quota: maildir
quota_rule: Trash:storage=100M
quota_warning: storage=10%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
quota_warning2: storage=5%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 95
quota_warning3: storage=1%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 99
trash: /us
49 matches
Mail list logo
