Hi,
Is there a way to enable telemetry or debug-level logging in Dovecot
IMAP, to see the exact IMAP command issued by the client and server?
E.g. to confirm if a certain MUA is indeed using IMAP IDLE, or if
it's doing LIST or LSUB.
The IMAP connection is made over TLS/SSL, so tcpdump won
When I do either:
$ hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/1.1/
or
$ hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/
and cd into the resulting directory ("1.1/" or "dovecot/") and do
autogen.sh and configure, ./configure tells me at the end:
NOTE: This is the UNSTABLE development branch of Dovecot
Timo, you mentioned you're getting tired of fighting Squat bugs lately.
Does that mean you know all the bugs, and just need time to find and fix
them?
Or should instead I try harder to find bugs by using Dovecot 1.1 on a
daily basis, and then sending you copies of mails that break it, like
ht
Thanks Timo, I updated my config again, according to the link you
sent. I'll reply again later if I see any more problems.
--
Matthew Thorley
I found a message on the list describing a similar problems (link
below) and added blocking=yes to my auth setting.
I had that in my last config with the old version and still had
trouble, but hopefully it will do the trick here.
--
matthew
http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg04643
On Feb 14, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Matthew Thorley wrote:
Timo > Where does pam authenticate from? Where does passwd (i.e. NSS)
Timo > authenticate from?
I'm not sure about passwd, but pam authentication comes from ldap.
Sounds like you're using nss_ldap. See
http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/
Sorry Timo your seeing these twice. For some reason my mail client
replied to you and not the list.
Timo > Where does pam authenticate from? Where does passwd (i.e. NSS)
Timo > authenticate from?
I'm not sure about passwd, but pam authentication comes from ldap.
It started failing again. Here ar
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 13:07 +0200, Tomi Vainio wrote:
Feb 14 11:52:33 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.crit] IMAP(tomppa): file message-parser.c: line 674:
assertion failed: (ctx->part->physical_pos >= ctx->input->v_offset)
Any idea how I could reproduce this? I've been running m
On Feb 14, 2008, at 11:07 PM, Matthew Thorley wrote:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
Where does pam authenticate from? Where does passwd (i.e. NSS)
authenticate from?
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Alright then. I took Charles advice, installed version 1.0.10, and
created a new config from scratch.
Dovecot is still hanging up randomly. When I starts to hang (stop
allowing users to login) I get errors like this in syslog
Feb 14 13:44:59 mail dovecot: pop3-login: Can't connect to auth server
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 13:07 +0200, Tomi Vainio wrote:
> > Feb 14 11:52:33 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.crit] IMAP(tomppa): file
> > message-parser.c: line 674: assertion failed: (ctx->part->physical_pos >=
> > ctx->input->v_offset)
Any idea how I could reproduce this? I've been running my IMAP stres
Hello,
I've got a problem using the plugin managsieve in dovecot (1.0.10 on
gentoo linux). I use local unix accounts on a linux machine, one for
each user with a .maildir in there home directory. Here is a snippet
of the logging.
Feb 14 20:17:48 obelix dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.10 starting up
It's what I'd expect. In fact, it's what UFS does. Renaming a file
doesn't change it's inode.
That's not true for the Solaris 9 implementation of UFS:
Sorry, I meant UFS on NetBSD. I didn't know Solaris would behave
differently.
Hey guys,
Is it possible to deny a user on POP or IMAP! For example, on the
primary server we use POP3 and IMAP but how I can force a user to use
POP3 and be unable to authenticate on IMAP ?
Thanks
Sebastien
Thanks Charles. I downloaded the latest code, and reconfigured from
scratch. Now everything is working.
Regards
--
matthew
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Charles Marcus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/13/2008, Matthew Thorley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > dovecot --version
> > 1.0.beta3
>
Bill Cole wrote:
At 12:27 PM +0100 2/14/08, Edgar Fuß wrote:
Am 13.02.2008 um 14:56 schrieb Bill Cole:
Not on all filesystems. Note what HFS+ (MacOS) does:
~ $ ls -lc foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foo
~ $ mkdir foodir
~ $ mv foo foodir
~ $ ls -lc foodir/foo
-rwxr-xr-x
Bill Cole wrote:
At 11:53 PM +0100 2/13/08, mouss imposed structure on a stream of
electrons, yielding:
Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
Not on all filesystems. Note what HFS+ (MacOS) does:
~ $ ls -lc foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foo
~ $ mkdir foodir
~ $ mv foo foodir
~ $ ls -lc foo
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 11:12 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote:
> Is it possible to deny a user on POP or IMAP! For example, on the
> primary server we use POP3 and IMAP but how I can force a user to use
> POP3 and be unable to authenticate on IMAP ?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/RestrictAcc
Hey guys,
Is it possible to deny a user on POP or IMAP! For example, on the
primary server we use POP3 and IMAP but how I can force a user to use
POP3 and be unable to authenticate on IMAP ?
Thanks
Sebastien
On Thursday, February 14 at 09:50 AM, quoth Bill Cole:
I'm curious: do you have examples of mail software that doesn't use
the timestamp? (I could see some run-once script not doing it, but
I'd be surprised if widely-used software didn't.)
The procmailrc man page says that MSGPREFIX defaults t
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 00:25 -0500, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> And, as Charles pointed out, in Dovecot 1.1 there's a plugin to do this.
> Does the expunge plugin work without the user logging in, though?
Yes. That's exactly what it does. It keeps user/mailbox <-> oldest_msg
mapping in a Berkele
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:09:54PM -0500, Phredd Groves wrote:
*
*I have recently gotten Dovecot running on my Solaris 5.8 mail server in order
*to replace UW IMAP. I'm currently testing it out with mail clients popular
*amongst my users. It's been working very well, with one vital exception.
*
*
At 11:53 PM +0100 2/13/08, mouss imposed structure on a stream of
electrons, yielding:
Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
Not on all filesystems. Note what HFS+ (MacOS) does:
~ $ ls -lc foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foo
~ $ mkdir foodir
~ $ mv foo foodir
~ $ ls -lc foodir/foo
-rwxr-xr-x
At 12:27 PM +0100 2/14/08, Edgar Fuß wrote:
>Am 13.02.2008 um 14:56 schrieb Bill Cole:
>
>>Not on all filesystems. Note what HFS+ (MacOS) does:
>>
>>~ $ ls -lc foo
>>-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foo
>>~ $ mkdir foodir
>>~ $ mv foo foodir
>>~ $ ls -lc foodir/foo
>>-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wk
At 12:25 AM -0500 2/14/08, Benjamin R. Haskell imposed structure on
a stream of electrons, yielding:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
Maildir DOES NOT require a timestamp in the filename, it's just common.
DJB's Maildir spec isn't RFC-esque (so it's not a MUST, in that
sense).
Am 13.02.2008 um 14:56 schrieb Bill Cole:
Not on all filesystems. Note what HFS+ (MacOS) does:
~ $ ls -lc foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foo
~ $ mkdir foodir
~ $ mv foo foodir
~ $ ls -lc foodir/foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foodir/foo
~ $ date
Wed Feb 13 08:39:24
Hi,
I've been using 1.0 but moved to beta to see if it works before release.
Both b14 and b15 dies sometimes when accessing folders. Last time I
fixed this by moving one message from folder to another and then back.
Next I'm trying to build this with debugging enabled.
Tomppa
> Feb 14 11:52:
On 2/14/2008, Benjamin R. Haskell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And, as Charles pointed out, in Dovecot 1.1 there's a plugin to do
this. Does the expunge plugin
Actually, its the 'Expire' plugin... ;)
work without the user logging in, though? (not that that's an
enormous problem -- more curiosit
On 2/13/2008, Matthew Thorley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
dovecot --version
1.0.beta3
Ack!
You will have to upgrade before anyone will spend any time trying to
help you. This is extremely old.
It is recommended that you start with a clean, fresh config file, and
slowly make the changes requ
29 matches
Mail list logo
