* WJCarpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Before I spend some time experimenting with what might be impossible,
> maybe someone can just tell me (either "how" or that it's
> impossible).
>
> I'd like to get perdition out of my environment (mainly to have one
> less moving part in my architecture). I'm
Before I spend some time experimenting with what might be impossible,
maybe someone can just tell me (either "how" or that it's
impossible).
I'd like to get perdition out of my environment (mainly to have one
less moving part in my architecture). I'm looking at dovecot's
built-in proxying. In my
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 03:00:21, Matt Ezell a écrit :
> You cannot do that with the /etc/passwd, only with a passwd-file. Not very
> useful if you are
> using them as actual system users.
>
> What you probably need to do is override the mail_executable setting to point
> to a script.
> Se
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
Can you do this with /etc/passwd ?
I tried to put a line like this :
pseudo:x:1010:100:My
Name,,,:/home/pseudo:/bin/zsh:userdb_mail=mbox:~/mail
But it doesn't work : I cannot even login using that line (the shell is
considered to be /bin/zsh:userdb_mail=mbox:~/mail)
I
Can you do this with /etc/passwd ?
I tried to put a line like this :
pseudo:x:1010:100:My
Name,,,:/home/pseudo:/bin/zsh:userdb_mail=mbox:~/mail
But it doesn't work : I cannot even login using that line (the shell is
considered to be /bin/zsh:userdb_mail=mbox:~/mail)
I already searched the wiki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I use userdb_mail at the extra_fields
a simple example is here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/PasswdFile
do a search at the wiki
Maxime Brugidou wrote:
| current version : 1.0.rc15
|
| Hi,
|
| I would just like to know if it's possible to hav
current version : 1.0.rc15
Hi,
I would just like to know if it's possible to have different mail
locations for different UNIX users, using pam authentication and the
passwd userdb. We also have some virtual users using an SQL db.
The current config is :
auth default:
username_translation: %@
On Jan 25, 2008 11:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, the issue was that SOMETHING is enforcing /var/log/dovecot-lda/log
> > size! I was able to get this working by rotating, and the solution
> > will be to constantly rotate, but I still need to figure out what's
> > enforcing this.
>
> Che
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 06:59 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I use the socket option I can't use the count option to create more
authentication processes. I get this error. Thanks in advance.
dovecot: Jan 25 06:57:04 Error: auth(default): Socket already exists:
/var/run/do
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 06:59 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
If I use the socket option I can't use the count option to create more
authentication processes. I get this error. Thanks in advance.
dovecot: Jan 25 06:57:04 Error: auth(default): Socket already exists:
/var/run/
It is not clear to me why I should use namespaces or symlinks to share a
single maildir mailbox with multiple users. Why not configure multiple mail
clients with the same account information?
Well, since by using the latter, you would introduce some kind of security
breach. What happens when on
On Saturday 26 January 2008 09:47:22 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:45 +0100, Daniel wrote:
> > This is the assert message in the error log:
> >
> > file maildir-mail.c: line 336 (maildir_mail_get_physical_size):
> > assertion failed: (mail->data.virtual_size != (uof
> > f_t)-1)
>
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:45 +0100, Daniel wrote:
> This is the assert message in the error log:
>
> file maildir-mail.c: line 336 (maildir_mail_get_physical_size):
> assertion failed: (mail->data.virtual_size != (uof
> f_t)-1)
Thanks, committed a fix.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On Saturday 26 January 2008 09:34:22 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:13 +0100, Daniel wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Using HEAD, and after the 7193:e5af14239137 changeset (Store
> > physical message sizes also to dovecot-uidlist if needed.) I'm
> > getting this:
>
> Hmm. I tried a few ways
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 09:13 +0100, Daniel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Using HEAD, and after the 7193:e5af14239137 changeset (Store physical
> message sizes also to dovecot-uidlist if needed.) I'm getting this:
Hmm. I tried a few ways and couldn't get it to crash.
> #3 0x1c0741cb in i_panic (format=0x3c00
Hi!
Using HEAD, and after the 7193:e5af14239137 changeset (Store physical
message sizes also to dovecot-uidlist if needed.) I'm getting this:
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x0a0a80dd in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.41.0
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x0a0e04a7 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Wouter Amsterdam wrote:
L.S.
It is not clear to me why I should use namespaces or symlinks to share a
single maildir mailbox with multiple users. Why not configure multiple mail
clients with the same account information?
Assuming your users also have non-shared email acco
17 matches
Mail list logo
