On Jan 8, 2008 7:31 AM, Bill Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 6:52 AM -0500 1/8/08, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
> >>What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
> >
> >I don't think its because anyone is snubbing you... ;)
On Jan 8, 2008 6:01 AM, Peter Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
> >>> What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
>
> I use Dovecot in conjunction with Sendmail with Maildirs as the
> mail store and it works fine.
On Jan 8, 2008 5:27 AM, Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:52:53 -0500
> Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
> > > What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
> >
> > I don't think its be
On Jan 7, 2008 9:55 PM, Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
>
> > I have to admit that I'm not quite sure why no one has responded to me
> about
> > this one. If I'm not providing enough information or incorrect
> information
> > please tell me.
I didn't notice anything either on migrating from 1 to 1.x but I wanted to
get some input.
Thanks Scott and Luigi,
Thanks,
Paul
P.A > -Original Message-
P.A > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dovecot-
P.A > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Silva
P.A > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008
on 1/8/2008 9:58 AM Paul A spake the following:
Hi, I'm currently using Dovecot version 1.0 and I want to update it to the
latest version. I know from version .99 to version 1.0 I had to change a few
things on the dovecot config.
When compiling the latest stable version should I just be able to
I already have a procmail rule in each user's directory that delivers
"X-Spam-Status: Yes" email to a "spam-mail" folder. and the others to the inbox
(specified in $DEFAULT) Assuming I did not want spam-mail under quota control I
suppose I would have to add a line at the end something like this
Paul A said the following on 01/08/2008 06:58 PM:
When compiling the latest stable version should I just be able to use the
same config I'm using for version 1.0 without making any changes ?
I have more than half a dozen installations on which I compiled and installed
the latest pre-1.0 and a
Tim Tyler, on 1/8/2008 12:54 PM, said the following:
Dovecot users,
I guess I should complain to Redhat. Their latest rhl release of
Dovecot is 1.0.rc15 on redhat 5. Its even older if you are running on
redhat 4 which ironically is much more stable. I even tried to run
dovecot directly t
Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
>
>> You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for
>> delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like?
>
> Right, that's what I mean -
>
> at the end of the default procmail rules (like in /et
Hi, I'm currently using Dovecot version 1.0 and I want to update it to the
latest version. I know from version .99 to version 1.0 I had to change a few
things on the dovecot config.
When compiling the latest stable version should I just be able to use the
same config I'm using for version 1.0 with
Dovecot users,
I guess I should complain to Redhat. Their latest rhl release of
Dovecot is 1.0.rc15 on redhat 5. Its even older if you are running
on redhat 4 which ironically is much more stable. I even tried to
run dovecot directly to ldap using userdb ldap, but that would fail
after a
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for
delivery? If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like?
Right, that's what I mean -
at the end of the default procmail rules (like in /etc/procmailrc), pipe
the message to d
You mean by having a procmail rule to send the mail on to dovecot for delivery?
If so, what would the line in the procmail rule look like?
Thanks.
Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
> I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procm
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, papi mac wrote:
I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procmail
and dovecot 1.0 installed on a single partition. I now need to set up
mail quotas for most of the users but not all. Just protecting
/var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME is probably good enough for
I have Fedora 7 from a standard installation running sendmail, procmail and
dovecot 1.0 installed on a single partition. I now need to set up mail quotas
for most of the users but not all. Just protecting /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME is
probably good enough for me. Since I just want mail quotas and
Is there a way of setting dovecot to use two mysql authentication databases,
either in a live/failover format or a round robin method.
Regards
John
Does the Trash plugin in 1.0.x log it's dirty deeds somehow?
I'd like to see that it works :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
Arguing with good advice will re
On 1/8/2008, Tim Tyler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We just recently deployed Dovecot 1.0.rc15
Ouch... old... upgrade...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hi,
I am having a bit of a problem with logging to stderr.
I am trying to run dovecot as sort of "inetd" install using daemontools.
I have daemontools 'services' named dovecot-pop3, dovecot-imap, etc.
The service command line looks like
tcpsvd -c20 -v -l 0 0 110 /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3-login [--
Dovecot experts,
We just recently deployed Dovecot 1.0.rc15 on a Redhat 5 system. I
have over 1400 users. At first it appeared to work fine. But soon,
we had complaints of students that couldn't retrieve their email. I
looked in the logs and found this error.
Jan 7 22:27:31 stu dovecot:
Hello,
I have dovecot installed and it works for about 3 hours then I get this
error (in /var/log/maillog):
Jan 8 08:42:53 stu dovecot: auth(default): pam(grossmsm,69.131.100.47):
pipe() failed: Too many open files
I set pam_limits.so to allow the user 'dovecot' to have 8192 open files, and
I a
At 6:52 AM -0500 1/8/08, Charles Marcus wrote:
Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
I don't think its because anyone is snubbing you... ;)
I think one of the reasons is not as many people use sendmail
anymore -
I have my master IMAP server running DC V1.0.10. The homedir and
INBOXdir are physically resident there and NFS exported (no caching) to
3 other machines. I have installed V1.1beta13 on one of them (which
thus accesses the homedir/INBOXdir remotely) and plan to have a limited
community test-d
>> Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
>>> What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
I use Dovecot in conjunction with Sendmail with Maildirs as the
mail store and it works fine. We use "procmail" as the local
delivery agent though.
Stuff in the sendmail
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:52:53 -0500
Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
> > What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
>
> I don't think its because anyone is snubbing you... ;)
>
> I think one of the reasons is n
Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
I don't think its because anyone is snubbing you... ;)
I think one of the reasons is not as many people use sendmail anymore -
I wouldn't have a clue... sorry...
--
Best r
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:02:40 -0500,
"Matt LaPlante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know that since maildir uses flat files, I can literally just delete
> messages doing something similar to the following with bash:
>
> for i in $(find /var/spool/vmail/host1/user/cur/ -mtime +30); do
> rm $i
> d
28 matches
Mail list logo
