On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 18:56 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I don't see any mention of support for SiS (single-instance-storage) as
> discussed previously on the list, even for upcoming 1.2/2.0
>
> Did this fall through a crack? Or did you decide it was going to be too
> difficult for the time bein
Hi,
Anyone able to get 'dirsize' quotas to work properly under 1.1beta9?
I can get them to reflect the size of the INBOX properly, but it never
seems to be adding up the size of the files in the folder directory
itself.
I'll keep hammering away at it if others are able to use dirsize with
no pro
Hi,
Under Solaris 8, the rmdir() command returns EEXIST instead of ENOTEMPTY
if an rmdir() is attempted on a directory with files still in it.
Dovecot 1.1beta9 currently gives tons of errors in the logfile as
a result of the code not checking for the right error value.
The function nfs_flush_fil
Timo Sirainen, on 5/21/2007 8:54 AM, said the following:
Upcoming v1.1 features, more or less implemented in this order:
Hey Timo,
I'm loving all of the new functionality - especially the full support
for Shared mailboxes and ACLs... but...
I don't see any mention of support for SiS (sin
Hi!
I'd like to provide shared mailboxes with maildir that should appear
like 'Shared/' to the clients.
Using the namespace configuration below, everything works fine, exept
one thing: Mail clients (only tested with Thunderbird) won't allow to
put mails directly in 'Shared/mailboxname' (the folde
At 7:04 PM -0500 11/30/07, Joe Allesi -X (joallesi - Coyote Creek
Consulting at Cisco) wrote:
You had to ask that...we're still on 0.99,
I'm not sure that holding to a strategy of "Embracing 0.99" is a wise
decision to admit to in a public forum under your own name or in any
way traceable to
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 01.12.2007 4:03, Jeff Grossman wrote:
* 19 FETCH (UID 7607 RFC822.SIZE 4590 FLAGS (\Recent)
BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (FROM TO CC SUBJECT DATE MESSAGE-ID PRIORITY
X-PRIORITY REFERENCES NEWSGROUPS IN-REPLY-TO CONTENT-TYPE)] {353}
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:25:23 -0800
Subject
On 11/30/2007, Joe Allesi -X (joallesi - Coyote Creek Consulting at
Cisco) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You had to ask that...we're still on 0.99,
Ouch... we had tons of problems on 0.99 with occasional random mbox file
corruption requiriung manual editing of the mbox file to correct it
(garbag
ja nein wrote:
Hi Velko,
I recently hit the same problem.
You have to add raw storage driver to your compile options, meaning
"--with-storages=maildir,mbox,dbox,raw,cydir", that will do the trick.
Many thanks, that fixed it :)
Maybe it would be good to update the description of available
Hi Velko,
I recently hit the same problem.
You have to add raw storage driver to your compile options, meaning
"--with-storages=maildir,mbox,dbox,raw,cydir", that will do the trick.
Maybe it would be good to update the description of available storage drivers
in configure script.
Regards,
Seba
Hello,
I'm new to dovecot, trying to configure a Postfix/Dovecot system.
Got everything in place - smtp with dovecot SASL and imap working fine,
maildir is created, thunderbird logs in successfuly .. but the Dovecot
LDA gives me this error on delivery: "Couldn't create internal raw
storage: Un
On 01.12.2007 4:03, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I am trying to figure out why my mail clients are not correctly
showing me the received date versus the date header date. I am using
Dovecot 1.1B9. Here is a copy of the rawlog from Dovecot when I
started up the client. Is Dovecot supposed to be sendi
12 matches
Mail list logo
