Erick Perez, on 11/24/2007 5:53 PM, said the following:
I order to investigate a locking problem, people in this forum
suggested to upgrade from 0.99 to 1.0. Which is obviously a good
response.
However I have some special setup in dovecot.conf and I want to know
if I will break something if I upg
Hi,
I upgraded from Courier to dovecot, and now I try to rebuild some of
the features I used to have. One was a monthly per user log of
maildrop's work.
I used this code in maildroprc:
DATE=`date +%m`
logfile "$MAILDIR/maildrop-$DATE.log"
This created a monthly log in the each user's Maildi
Hi,
I found the following code on the net which should redirect all mails
to another address depending on the time of day (useful for forwarding
mails to work):
require ["regex"];
if allof (header :regex "date" "(08|09|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17):..:..",
not header :regex "date" "(sat|s
On Nov 24, 2007 4:13 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > On Friday, November 23 at 01:53 PM, quoth Erick Perez:
> >> Hi all,
> >> I have a locking problem in a Centos 4.4 linux machine with the
> >> following config:
> >> dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4
> >
> > The problem is quite
I order to investigate a locking problem, people in this forum
suggested to upgrade from 0.99 to 1.0. Which is obviously a good
response.
However I have some special setup in dovecot.conf and I want to know
if I will break something if I upgrade.
So, here is my dovecot.conf 0.99
Note: Here are the
A couple of them probably did. I also noticed a Rule in Apple Mail
that was sending mail that should have stayed in the INBOX into
another mailbox so that explains another problem. Seems I am able to
read all mail now. Just need to know how to get it to not display
the .INBOX directory a
Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, November 23 at 01:53 PM, quoth Erick Perez:
>> Hi all,
>> I have a locking problem in a Centos 4.4 linux machine with the
>> following config:
>> dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4
>
> The problem is quite likely one that was fixed in more recent versions
> of dovecot. Versions
James, on 11/24/2007 2:12 AM, said the following:
Weird, The problem seems to have gone away, I can read all mail boxes now
It was probably just building the indexes... did the problem folders
have a lot of mail in them?
--
Best regards,
Charles
> > True. I use crm114 now which is a lot faster :)
> How are you finding CRM114? Is it faster than dspam w/ the hash driver?
Yes, I think it's faster, and dspam seemed to grow my database
indefinitely even with all cleanups present.
> How is the accuracy? Are there any other important facts I
Yes, bad form to reply to myself. I forgot to ask, does CRM114 have
database backends or just filesystem backends?
Trever
On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 01:16 -0700, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> Johannes, et al.
>
> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 14:29 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > But it's slow. Especially with
Johannes, et al.
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 14:29 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > But it's slow. Especially with bulk moves
>
> True. I use crm114 now which is a lot faster :)
How are you finding CRM114? Is it faster than dspam w/ the hash driver?
How is the accuracy? Are there any other important f
11 matches
Mail list logo
