Re: [Dovecot] v1.1 max connections per user

2007-06-30 Thread Christian Balzer
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:12:30 -0400 Bill Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do concurrent sessions for POP3 really ever make sense? > See http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server "Session locking" for a rationale why dovecot defaults to allowing it. Another scenario would be a pop3 client at home down

Re: [Dovecot] v1.1 max connections per user

2007-06-30 Thread Bill Cole
At 8:21 PM -0400 6/30/07, Bill Boebel wrote: On Sat, June 30, 2007 7:50 pm, Charles Marcus said: Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 7:25 PM, said the following: On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 19:11 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 6:43 PM, said the following: v1.1 has now: # M

Re: [Dovecot] v1.1 max connections per user

2007-06-30 Thread Bill Boebel
On Sat, June 30, 2007 7:50 pm, Charles Marcus said: > Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 7:25 PM, said the following: >> On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 19:11 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 6:43 PM, said the following: v1.1 has now: # Maximum number of connections allo

Re: [Dovecot] v1.1 max connections per user

2007-06-30 Thread Charles Marcus
Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 7:25 PM, said the following: On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 19:11 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 6:43 PM, said the following: v1.1 has now: # Maximum number of connections allowed for a user. The limits are enforced # separately for IMAP and POP3 co

Re: [Dovecot] v1.1 max connections per user

2007-06-30 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 19:11 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 6:43 PM, said the following: > > v1.1 has now: > > > > # Maximum number of connections allowed for a user. The limits are enforced > > # separately for IMAP and POP3 connections, so you can move this setting > >

Re: [Dovecot] v1.1 max connections per user

2007-06-30 Thread Charles Marcus
Timo Sirainen, on 6/30/2007 6:43 PM, said the following: v1.1 has now: # Maximum number of connections allowed for a user. The limits are enforced # separately for IMAP and POP3 connections, so you can move this setting # inside protocol {} to have separate settings for them. NOTE: The user name

[Dovecot] v1.1 max connections per user

2007-06-30 Thread Timo Sirainen
v1.1 has now: # Maximum number of connections allowed for a user. The limits are enforced # separately for IMAP and POP3 connections, so you can move this setting # inside protocol {} to have separate settings for them. NOTE: The user names # are compared case-sensitively, so make sure your userdb

Re: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-30 Thread Gabriel Millerd
On 6/30/07, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The FSF highly recommends putting the whole lot of it in each file. It doesn't hurt and is the safest bet. There are templates to use, that look like Easy to do with a lot of rc systems to push and maintain the proper header notice, that you

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-30 Thread Charles Marcus
Curious, though - why *not* make cydir a real usable format, if its performance is so good? What if dbox's performance will be even better? We'll see. Heh... don't know why I even bothered asking - you are always about 357 steps ahead of me... ;) Is it only/because there is no good soluti

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-30 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 13:01 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > >> One advantage of cydir over dbox was mentioned by Mark above re > >> incremental backups - with dbox, you'd still have to backup the > >> entire mailbox file, while with cydir, you'd only have to copy > >> newer messages. > > > I was

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-30 Thread Charles Marcus
I did the ext3 -> ext4 switch on two of our proxyservers a few months ago. Then we forgot (!) about that test and the boxes just kept running and running and running ... Interesting... have you noticed any differences in performance? -- Best regards, Charles

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-30 Thread Charles Marcus
One advantage of cydir over dbox was mentioned by Mark above re incremental backups - with dbox, you'd still have to backup the entire mailbox file, while with cydir, you'd only have to copy newer messages. I was thinking about making dbox configurable. If it is run in one-mail-per-file mode

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-30 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please, lets not start that war up again! ;) > > Reiser has worked fine for me for many years, but I think the next time > I rebuild my servers I'll be using ext3, in anticipation of ext4 (since > it should be a fairly seamless switch)... I did the ext3

Re: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-30 Thread Axel Thimm
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:14:39PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > I thought about committing this change to all .c files: > > Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always > correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was > changed. Copyright is owned by the

Re: [Dovecot] connection dropped by imap

2007-06-30 Thread Mantas
apache log say nothing. dovecot log : dovecot: Jun 30 10:56:06 Info: auth(default): passwd([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): unknown user dovecot: Jun 30 10:56:06 Info: auth(default): passwd([EMAIL PROTECTED],127.0.0.1): unknown user dovecot: Jun 30 10:56:06 Info: imap-login: Login: user=<[EMAIL PROTEC