On 3 Jun, 2007, at 17:03, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Should be already possible with the development version (wonder what I
should call it now that I can't call it CVS HEAD anymore ..
"development", "1.1.UNSTABLE", "hg", ..?):
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:LAYOUT=FS
Sweet!
It doesn't use dots
* On 04/06/07 02:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
| On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 21:20 +0300, Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote:
| > Here is a backtrace of the dovecot-auth crash:
|
| Two problems with it:
|
| > #0 0x805dc00 in userdb_blocking_lookup ()
|
| Debugging symbols were stripped. Could you try buildin
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:57:49AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 18:59 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> May 24 18:45:35 hostname dovecot: IMAP(username):
>
fchown(/home/username/Maildir/dovecot/public/control/org/.mailfolder/dovecot-uidlist)
failed:
> Operation not pe
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 18:59 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> May 24 18:45:35 hostname dovecot: IMAP(username):
> fchown(/home/username/Maildir/dovecot/public/control/org/.mailfolder/dovecot-uidlist)
> failed:
> Operation not permitted
I'm not sure if you already figured this out, but these calls
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 22:26 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:28:56AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> ACL plugin shouldn't have anything to do with that decision. The \Seen
> flag is stored privately if you have created dovecot-shared file to the
> maildir.
>
> Is i
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:28:56AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
ACL plugin shouldn't have anything to do with that decision. The \Seen
flag is stored privately if you have created dovecot-shared file to the
maildir.
Is it possible to have dovecot enforce the file mode and group owner of
ins
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:38 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
> Ok, here's the short and sweet version of my dilemma. I have a group of
> servers mounting a shared NFS device to hold mail data for many
> different domains. Is it worth the load balancing management nightmare
> of setting up dedicating
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:31 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> I suggest, that you shouldn't try to do that.
>
> > - Message contains In-Reply-To: header
> > - Subject doesn't contain Re:
..
> > - Body doesn't contain any quotes
..
> > - User's first message to list
>
> Hmm, I find this test a bit st
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 12:46 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote:
> > 4272 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap ## dovecot
> > ILoading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap
> > IModule loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so
> > FPlugin imap_quota not found from direc
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:30 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> *** 3. When user is over quota, have LDA deliver to the folder
> referenced above (# 1) - (yes, accept the message for final delivery
> from the sending mta), and then update the Quota Status message and move
> it to the Inbox.
>
> Opti
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 17:30 +0200, Marc Delling wrote:
> first of all: this works to some point but is such a configuration
> valid? can a public namespace be the maildir of a user?
Yes.
> now the problem:
> the whole mail system runs with one uid/gid and virtual users, which
> has the effect
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 00:23 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering using delivery for delivering emails. The question is about
> quota. Does delivery check quota for single maildir or for entire collection
> of user folders?
>
> Example:
> /var/mail/user/{new,cur,tmp}
> /v
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:31 -0300, Venilton Junior wrote:
> Here follows my configuration:
dovecot -n is preferrable to copy&pasteing dovecot.conf.
> user_attrs = mail,homeDirectoryquota=quota=maildir:storage
This is a mix of old and new style user_attrs format. That might be
causing the pro
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 22:19 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> I'm having persistent trouble deleting larger attachments from messages
> in Mozilla/Seamonkey mail, and I'm thinking it may be related to
> Dovecot. A bug report is over at
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381759
126 append
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 03:35 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:59 +0200, Chris Laif wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I wonder if it is possible to log the number of bytes send in response
> > to IMAP commands. Unfortunately there seems to be no config option
> > similar to "pop3_logout_f
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:20 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > http://dovecot.org/patches/mbox-snarf-plugin.c
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to setup this plugin on a Debian Etch machine but it
> crashes the Dovecot daemons.
>
> Debian Etch uses the sourcecode of Dovecot 1.0rc15 + s
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:13 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed the dovecot on my redhat linux host. But when I log in
> with dovecot/test I got Error: no authentication failed after I got ok
> dovecot ready when I connect to local host. dovecot/test was set in the
> password.
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 12:06 +0200, eizert wrote:
> Not in Dovecot...
> In my log, i've simply :
> dovecot: auth(default): Client didn't present valid SSL certificate
Set verbose_ssl=yes and it should log more. It should then log either
"Invalid certificate" or "Valid certificate". If it logged ne
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 11:56 +0800, Tony Tsang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am writing a plugin to override some built-in imap commands. But
> when client logs out, imap segfaults during unregistering commands.
> What is the correct procedure for overriding imap commands in dovecot?
I don't think anyone
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:23 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the dovecot-sieve plugin from the hg repository
> (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-sieve-1.0/) does not build against
> current dovecot-1.0 repository.
..
> /.libs/libsieve.a(script.o): In function `sieve_script_parse':
> /usr/src
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:54 +0200, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Many thanks,
> its working fine with your suggestion.
> But only with outlook I still have problems. Today morning I found out
> that outlook does work only I keep the separator line empty
> with
>
> namespace private {
> # separator = .
>
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:22 -0400, Henry wrote:
> dovecot -n:
> # /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
Set mail_location explicitly:
mail_location = maildir:~
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:59 +0200, Chris Laif wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I wonder if it is possible to log the number of bytes send in response
> to IMAP commands. Unfortunately there seems to be no config option
> similar to "pop3_logout_format".
There's a patch for it. Someone already gave a link to it w
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:10 -0600, Jon Slater wrote:
> I’ve been using Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.14-8.fc4) on my Fedora Core 4 (kernel
> 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4) machine from quite some time.
Note that 0.99 is several years old already and it's not really
supported anymore.
> So it looks pretty obvious tha
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:33 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are running dovecot-imapd on Debian sarge out of the backports.org
> packages (version 1.0.rc15-1~bpo1).
>
> We have ~ 80 clients using secure IMAP.
>
> I understand that imap-login has to run for every SSL connection. Thus
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 13:19 -0400, Eric and Barbara Sammons wrote:
> Working with a dovecot migration, I am curious what version (if any)
> of Dovecot (dovecot-auth) supports SMD5 and ldap-MD5 when using
> Dovecot -> OpenLDAP direct binding?
What do you mean by "direct binding"? If you use auth_bi
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:48 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I'm using Dovecot version 1.0.0. I was using Dovecot version 1.0.0
> beta3 or alpha4. I upgraded to Dovecot 1.0.0 to make sure that was
> not the issue.
And after upgrade and deleting .imap/ directory this has still happened
to new mai
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 16:58 +0100, Andrew Pounce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to setup the vodafone email sync ( provided by visto
> apparently ) and have not been able to do so - I'm getting an error
> message in my mail logs which looks as if there is a problem with
> certificates somewhere
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 22:43 -0700, SeattleServer.com wrote:
> We'd have:
>
> .Folder/{cur,new,tmp}
> .Folder/.SubFolder1/{cur,new,tmp}
> .Folder/.SubFolder1/{cur,new,tmp}
> .Folder/.SubFolder1/.foo/{cur,new,tmp}
> .Folder/.SubFolder1/.bar/{cur,new,tmp}
> .Folder/.SubFolder2/{cur,new,tmp}
>
> That
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 21:20 +0300, Odhiambo WASHINGTON wrote:
> Here is a backtrace of the dovecot-auth crash:
Two problems with it:
> #0 0x805dc00 in userdb_blocking_lookup ()
Debugging symbols were stripped. Could you try building it without
removing them, at least from dovecot-auth binary? I
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 18:49 +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote:
> The problem is that the dovecot plugin does not convert the string to
> RFC2047 encoded words, it treats it literally and thus sends malformed
> (from RFC's point of view) message - with improper Subject field
> encoding.
>
> Any chances o
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 10:47 -0400, Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been reading the acl documentation and it seems that a "connect acl"
> is not available.
>
> I need to limit the users that can login in an IP number, is that
> posible with
> dovecot 1.0? (i.e. only these users can login
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:54 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:48 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I've used GLib before. The biggest problem I see with it is that it
> > doesn't support memory pools. That's why I duplicated most of its useful
> > functionality originally instea
>
> Please don't. One reason Dovecot is so easy to get up and running
> quickly is that it has minimal dependencies. For those of us who
> aren't running Linux on PCs that can become a headache very quickly,
> as the authors of many of the depended-upon libraries often get
> "creative" with nonpor
On 6/2/07, Oliver Schulze L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to limit the users that can login in an IP number, is that
posible with
dovecot 1.0? (i.e. only these users can login from the Internet)
Or a new plugin should be written? It is complicated to do that?
Might look at using perditi
On Jun 3, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
That's not to say that simply adding one dependency on glib would
cause a huge problem...but it indicates the adoption of a mindset,
and it's a slippery slope.
The same applies to duplicating code in the interest of avoiding
dependencies.
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 13:48 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
>That's not to say that simply adding one dependency on glib would
> cause a huge problem...but it indicates the adoption of a mindset,
> and it's a slippery slope.
The same applies to duplicating code in the interest of avoiding
depen
Hello List,
This is dovecot 1.0.0 on FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE. I did not provide this
information before:-)
I am back again and I think I am edging closer to getting a solution.
I have done some modifications and now dovecot gives me a different
error message than before
Here is what I have f
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:54 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:48 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I've used GLib before. The biggest problem I see with it is that it
> > doesn't support memory pools. That's why I duplicated most of its useful
> > functionality originally instea
On Jun 3, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
I presume porting Dovecot to use the glib main loop abstraction (which
is nice and lean, the object system is a separate library) is out
of the
question?
Please don't. One reason Dovecot is so easy to get up and running
quickly is that it
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:48 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I've used GLib before. The biggest problem I see with it is that it
> doesn't support memory pools. That's why I duplicated most of its useful
> functionality originally instead of just using it directly. So I think
> it's much better to fix
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 16:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> My poor laptop is running a IMAP server, a HTTP server and a SMTP
> server.
>
> > > This fixes it for imap/pop3-login:
> > > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/0021765627f3
>
> Sweet, although this still wakes up when there are clients connec
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:27 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> ..Or maybe just fix the basic timeout_*() API. Add a new timeout_reset()
> call == timeout_remove() + timeout_add(original values) and then make
> the implementation be fast with hundreds of timeouts. The timeouts are
> currently kept in lin
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:13 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I did once try to reduce these unnecessary wakeups, but then I thought
> > it's probably not worth the trouble. No-one's going to run an IMAP
> > server in their laptop.. :)
:)
My poor laptop is running a IMAP server, a HTTP server and
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:13 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Maybe the optimal solution would be to create a new abstraction layer.
> Most of the timeout handlers are just checking for idle timeouts.
>
> struct idle_timeout *idle_timeout_new(unsigned int secs,
> timeout_callback_t *callback, void *co
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 18:05 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > My laptop runs a local IMAP server so that I'm immune from breaking my
> > mail client, and when playing around with powertop I discovered that
> > Dovecot (in particular imap-login) wakes up every 1000ms and then every
> > 50ms even when
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 14:06 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My laptop runs a local IMAP server so that I'm immune from breaking my
> mail client, and when playing around with powertop I discovered that
> Dovecot (in particular imap-login) wakes up every 1000ms and then every
> 50ms even when n
Hi,
My laptop runs a local IMAP server so that I'm immune from breaking my
mail client, and when playing around with powertop I discovered that
Dovecot (in particular imap-login) wakes up every 1000ms and then every
50ms even when no clients are connected. A bit of stracing shows this:
gettimeof
48 matches
Mail list logo
