hi...
i not undestand this plugin (quota) , because if i set a value 10240 (like
in example) when i send a 4 messages with attaches sizes like 4MB they do
not nothing, but if i want to send a message like 12MB the dont me do that,
but in the first way the user inbox have like 20MB. ¿:(?
i ha
On 5/24/07, Eric Rostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes - with the ability to ise IMAP as a connection channel you could do
> anything that Microsoft Exchange does and more. The idea is that you
> can establish a connection between any server app and
I have some public mailboxes setup in 1.0.0,
location =
maildir:/egr/mail/shared/org:CONTROL=%h/Maildir/dovecot/public/control/org:INDEX=%h/Maildir/dovecot/public/indexes/org
I also have a dovecot-shared file in the maildir folders so messages that are
added
to the inbox get a decent set of def
I have Dovecot 1.0 running on a SLES 10 mail server using postfix 2.2
and amvisd-maia. The mailboxes are stored in Maildir format with all
the domains and users stored in a mySQL database. I would like to
implement quotas for the system and have looked at the VDA patch for
postfix and/or quotas
23.05.2007 23:02 Nicolas Boullis:
I have written a plugin so that each time a message is added to a
specific box, a program is run and the message is piped into it.
Note that the message is also really added to the box.
I'm totally in. There is this dspam plugin by Johannes Berg mentioned
Quoting Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yes - with the ability to ise IMAP as a connection channel you could do
anything that Microsoft Exchange does and more. The idea is that you
can establish a connection between any server app and any client app.
Yes, this is correct, and what some people
Eric and Barbara Sammons spake the following on 5/24/2007 12:37 PM:
> Can you elaborate on this convert plugin? I have not heard of it and am
> curious if it is available in 0.99.
>
No, it isn't. Being a recent convert to 1.0.0, I would recommend you upgrade
to the 1.0.0 stable. 0.99 is at least
Quoting Steffen Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
You need to start distinguishing between "SSH the protocol" and "SSH the
shell implementation", afaict the protocol should allow any use like
this without ever granting access to a shell, like sftp-server etc
On 24.5.2007, at 22.22, Eric and Barbara Sammons wrote:
I am running dovecot 0.99. Everything works great; however, now I
am looking at several different tools to convert mbox to Maildir.
It seems the tools, mb2md.pl, perfect_maildir.pl, and others all do
what they claim; however, when th
On May 24, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Eric and Barbara Sammons wrote:
Can you elaborate on this convert plugin? I have not heard of it
and am curious if it is available in 0.99.
Sorry... I jumped on the Dovecoat train at v1.0.0. Don't know if
it's available in 0.99.
B. Bodger
Can you elaborate on this convert plugin? I have not heard of it and am
curious if it is available in 0.99.
Thank you!
Bruce Bodger wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Eric and Barbara Sammons wrote:
I am running dovecot 0.99. Everything works great; however, now I am
looking at several d
I am running dovecot 0.99. Everything works great; however, now I am
looking at several different tools to convert mbox to Maildir. It seems
the tools, mb2md.pl, perfect_maildir.pl, and others all do what they
claim; however, when the messages are converted and they are stored in
Maildir/cur,
Hi,
El Jueves, 24 de Mayo de 2007 09:58, Mart Pirita escribió:
> Tere.
>
>
> I'm using Debian, postfix & dovecot, with system quotas and settings in
> dovecot.conf:
>
> But if system quota is full, users won't get new messages but won't get
> also any kind information, and also in mail.log is noth
I'm having persistent trouble deleting larger attachments from messages
in Mozilla/Seamonkey mail, and I'm thinking it may be related to
Dovecot. A bug report is over at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381759
I do not have the version number of Dovecot available, unless you know
how
On May 24, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
Also keep in mind that people dump Exchange because it's slow,
complex and
buggy, whereas Dovecot is mean and lean.
Remember the old UNIX paradigm -- do one thing and do it well.
Dovecot is
an IMAP server, and does the job well. A calen
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:28 +0200, Antonio Casado Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi Timo.
>
> Is there any header that it define client's language? That would give a
> customized answer to the language of the client.
I don't think that's usually sent in mails. You could maybe guess
something with the used c
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:50:11AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Keep in mind that one of the reasons people buy Exchange is because
> Exchange does things that people want. A calendar is one of many
> examples. But to start with I'm thinking more in terms of controlling
> server side email settings.
Hi Timo.
Is there any header that it define client's language? That would give a
customized answer to the language of the client.
Another possibility is to give two answers: one in English and another
one in the default language of server. Example:
Cuota de espacio excedida / Quota exceeded.
Ti
Hi Timo.
Is there any header that it define client's language? That would give a
customized answer to the language of the client.
Another possibility is to give two answers: one in English and another
one in the default language of server. Example:
Cuota de espacio excedida / Quota exceeded.
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 23:02 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> I have written a plugin so that each time a message is added to a
> specific box, a program is run and the message is piped into it. Note
> that the message is also really added to the box.
I guess I could also say that I've been goin
Robert Schetterer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Cusack schrieb:
On May 23, 2007 12:33:04 PM -0700 David Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMAP es
Charles wrote:
> Because it hasn't - they can't GET this mail until they deal with their
> over-quota condition. All this does is prevent mail from being REJECTED,
> and provide a more consistent and effective way to communicate the
> problem to the user.
>
> [...] - but I have a customer who want
On 5/24/07, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:33 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> It might, but the server doesn't.
> Many IMAP servers do not allow users to have SSH access on the box, but
> prefer locking them down, e.g. with Webinterfaces or IMAP. Also, Dovecot
>
> That won't be happening for v1.0.x and not really a priority to me for
> v1.1 either. Related to this in TODO:
I see. I know that few people encounter with this problem.
> If you're interested in fixing it yourself I can give a bit of help :)
Thanks. I'll try to fix it myself. Please gi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
You need to start distinguishing between "SSH the protocol" and "SSH the
shell implementation", afaict the protocol should allow any use like
this without ever granting access to a shell, like sftp-server et
On 24.5.2007, at 17.53, MAEDA, Go wrote:
If you're interested in fixing it yourself I can give a bit of
help :)
Thanks. I'll try to fix it myself. Please give me advice.
The function I have to modify is _read() in istream-raw-mbox.c,
isn't
it? And need to add some code to skip duplicate
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Hi,
> I have written a plugin so that each time a message is added to a
> specific box, a program is run and the message is piped into it. Note
> that the message is also really added to the box.
> I've been using it for nearly 3 month, for spam/ham learning, and have
>
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Note: The STATUS command is intended to access the
>status of mailboxes other than the currently selected
>mailbox. Because the STATUS command can cause the
>mailbox to be opened internally, and because thi
On Thursday, May 24 at 10:40 AM, quoth Timo Sirainen:
dovecot: Error: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): file maildir-sync.c: line
1075 (maildir_sync_index): assertion failed: (uid > prev_uid)
Can this be reproduced?
Not reliably or at-will (yet); it was a bit of a surprise.
Is there anything special
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:08 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:03 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > Or should dovecot be not relying on cached state and revalidate the
> > > mailbox on STATUS, even if it is already SELECTED?
> >
> > Dovecot checks if new/ or cur/ directory's mt
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:33 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> It might, but the server doesn't.
> Many IMAP servers do not allow users to have SSH access on the box, but
> prefer locking them down, e.g. with Webinterfaces or IMAP. Also, Dovecot
> has other ways of authentification, e.g. Virtual Use
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:03 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Or should dovecot be not relying on cached state and revalidate the
> > mailbox on STATUS, even if it is already SELECTED?
>
> Dovecot checks if new/ or cur/ directory's mtime changed. If neither
> did, it trusts its cached state (basical
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:48 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Basically everything works fine except that in gnus typing 'g' in the
> *Group* buffer, which is supposed to check for new mail and list the
> number of new messages, fails to notice new mail.
Show me the IMAP traffic logs and ls -ld output o
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:56 +0300, Giannis Zachariadis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using dovecot v1.0rc23 for about 500 users since february with no
> particular problems. I'm using Maildir format and ldap authentication.
> A recently added user can't check his mails any more. In the logs I get
>
>
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:43 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 00:52 +0800, M1 wrote:
> >> Dear Timo,
> >>
> >> How about managedsieve?
> >
> > I think it'll have to wait for v2.0. Especially because I want it to be
> > distributed in dovecot-sieve packag
I am running
NetBSD/i386 3.1ish and 4.0ish
dovecot 1.0.0
procmail delivering into maildirs
gnus from CVS head
emacs 21.4
thunderbird 2
gnome mail-notification 4
configured to required SSL.
Basically everything works fine except that in gnus typing 'g' in the
*Group* buffer, whic
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 19:31 +0900, 前田 剛 wrote:
>I would like you to consider improving Dovecot to skip second (and
> duplicated, unnecessary) "From" separator.
That won't be happening for v1.0.x and not really a priority to me for
v1.1 either. Related to this in TODO:
- always add empty
Hi folks, hope that get some help for some doubts :P
I've configured dovecot in a clustered environment 3 X HP Proliant
DL380+RHEL ES 4.0+EVA4000+GFS.
Everything is working great.
But, when I putted this cluster on production, I had some problems with
quota+ldap in my dovecot.
Here
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 00:52 +0800, M1 wrote:
>> Dear Timo,
>>
>> How about managedsieve?
>
> I think it'll have to wait for v2.0. Especially because I want it to be
> distributed in dovecot-sieve package, not in the main dovecot package.
> This just isn't possible without th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Bodger schrieb:
>
> On May 24, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> but there are a lot of problems with apple mail and imap
>
> Neither I nor any of our users has discovered any problems using apple
> mail (mail.app) in imap mode w
On 5/24/07, Robert Schetterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DINH Viêt Hoà schrieb:
> On 5/24/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:37 +0200, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
>> > As a calendaring solution with group calendars and all the like, use
>> CalDAV
>> > -- a webdav ex
On May 24, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
but there are a lot of problems with apple mail and imap
Neither I nor any of our users has discovered any problems using
apple mail (mail.app) in imap mode with dovecot. What sometimes
"appears" to be a problem is the use (or mis-use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DINH Viêt Hoà schrieb:
> On 5/24/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:37 +0200, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
>> > As a calendaring solution with group calendars and all the like, use
>> CalDAV
>> > -- a webdav extension desi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis Maloney schrieb:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi all, i think sombody would have like to a imap calender solution
>> implemented in dovecot? Am i right here?
>>
>> You can have simular right now using thunderbird , lightning, kolab
>> plugin, (
Dovecot dies while processing UIDL command when accessing malformed
Qpopper's mbox which has duplicated "From " separator. Qpopper
occasionally makes such header while rewriting mbox.
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/89aa4c7f40b7
It works. Thanks you.
Although the ma
Or how about using a virtual folder instead (assuming they will be
supported in Dovecot in the near future). It would work like this:
1) A read-only global folder called overquota (normally not accessible)
contains one generic message saying that you are over quota and will not
receive any new
On 5/24/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:37 +0200, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
> As a calendaring solution with group calendars and all the like, use CalDAV
> -- a webdav extension designed for exactly that purpose. There is an
> excellent implementation available at
Tere.
I'm using Debian, postfix & dovecot, with system quotas and settings in
dovecot.conf:
default_mail_env =
maildir:%h/Maildir:INDEX=/var/spool/dovecot/index/%u:CONTROL=/var/spool/dovecot/control/%u
But if system quota is full, users won't get new messages but won't get
also any kind inform
Hello,
I'm using dovecot v1.0rc23 for about 500 users since february with no
particular problems. I'm using Maildir format and ldap authentication.
A recently added user can't check his mails any more. In the logs I get
May 23 14:35:58 mailsrv deliver(): [ID 702911 mail.error] Timeout
whi
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:58 +0200, Jan van den Berg wrote:
> You're right I had this in my query:
> concat('maildir:', maildrop, username) as mail
>
> I deleted it and now this seems to work for me:
> mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/mail/%1u/%1.1u/%u:INDEX=MEMORY
>
> I must say I am _stunned_
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:51 +0900, 前田 剛 wrote:
> Dovecot dies while processing UIDL command when accessing malformed
> Qpopper's mbox which has duplicated "From " separator. Qpopper
> occasionally makes such header while rewriting mbox.
Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/89aa4c7f
You're right I had this in my query:
concat('maildir:', maildrop, username) as mail
I deleted it and now this seems to work for me:
mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/mail/%1u/%1.1u/%u:INDEX=MEMORY
I must say I am _stunned_ by the/your reaction speed on the maillist
(thanks for the wiki this expl
I am testing migration from Qpopper 4.0.5 and have come across a problem.
Dovecot dies while processing UIDL command when accessing malformed
Qpopper's mbox which has duplicated "From " separator. Qpopper
occasionally makes such header while rewriting mbox.
In the attached file, unnecessary "From
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:37 +0200, Adi Kriegisch wrote:
> As a calendaring solution with group calendars and all the like, use CalDAV
> -- a webdav extension designed for exactly that purpose. There is an
> excellent implementation available at: http://rscds.sourceforge.net/ (also
> Apple has relea
Adi Kriegisch wrote:
[snip]
Dovecot is an excellent piece of software. It is fast, compatible, has an
enourmous amount of configuration possibilities and just works. I very well
understand that software like this is rare -- but by demanding extensions
that have nothing to do with what that softwa
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:19 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently saw these errors in my log, and one of my users complained
> that Dovecot disconnected him unexpectedly. Any idea what might have
> happened?
>
> dovecot: Error: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): file maildir-sync.c: line
>
Hi!
> Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird
> plugins talk to custom server application over the IMAP interface? For
> >>>
> >>> Sounds like a job for ACAP.
> >>
> >> "It's rumoured to be the most complex Internet Engineering Task Force
> >> designed pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Cusack schrieb:
> On May 23, 2007 12:33:04 PM -0700 David Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Frank Cusack wrote:
>>> On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMAP establishes a connection between the
58 matches
Mail list logo
