-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolas Boullis schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a plugin so that each time a message is added to a
> specific box, a program is run and the message is piped into it. Note
> that the message is also really added to the box.
>
> I've been using it fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 May 2007, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote:
By the was, I don't understand why a thunderbird plugin would not be
able to do ssh :)
It might, but the server doesn't.
Many IMAP servers do not allow users to have SSH access on the box, but
prefer lock
I'm converting over a virtual user installation that used Postfix and
maildrop with a MySQL back-end for mailbox lookups to use Dovecot LDA.
The maildrop setup used a database table like:
+-++-++
| address | owner
Hello,
I recently saw these errors in my log, and one of my users complained
that Dovecot disconnected him unexpectedly. Any idea what might have
happened?
dovecot: Error: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): file maildir-sync.c: line
1075 (maildir_sync_index): assertion failed: (uid > prev_uid)
dovec
On May 23, 2007 12:33:04 PM -0700 David Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server.
Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Th
This could be as simple as:
*** 1. Make dovecot aware of and use a special 'Quota Status' message
that it uses to inform a user that they are over quota. This message
should be able to be customized, with variables (like, for example, it
should list the messages that are bounced - including, o
On 5/23/07, David Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
> On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't
>> it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins
On 5/23/07, Rick Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 21:11 +0200, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote:
> why not use ssh for that purpose ?
You wouldn't necessarily want all your users to ssh into your mail
server, or deal with the configuration of that.
And what about a chrooted environme
Frank Cusack wrote:
> On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't
>> it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins
>> talk to custom server application over the IMAP
funkypunky drunky wrote:
Yeah it is a great idea. For example with a good plugin which is used
in a Webmail environment. Individual clients may submit spam mails to
the email server with these imap "extension" and it will create self
control against with the users of email server.
Yep -
Marc Perkel, 23.05.2007 (d.m.y):
> IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server.
> Wouldn't it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird
> plugins talk to custom server application over the IMAP interface? For
> example, personalized server settings. Suppose
Hi,
I have written a plugin so that each time a message is added to a
specific box, a program is run and the message is piped into it. Note
that the message is also really added to the box.
I've been using it for nearly 3 month, for spam/ham learning, and have
not had any problem with it.
Marc Perkel wrote:
Here's some thoughts I'd like to throw out there. I know it's not
standard IMAP protocol but someone has to try new ideas first and I want
to see what people (Timo) think of this.
IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server.
Wouldn't it be great if it co
Yeah it is a great idea. For example with a good plugin which is used in a
Webmail environment. Individual clients may submit spam mails to the email
server with these imap "extension" and it will create self control against
with the users of email server.
2007/5/23, Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Timo would you like to add some localization for "quota exceeded". I
cannot find a way to localize the message "Quota Exceeded" Most of my
clients dont know english. Maybe you may put these feature. Surely dovecot
becomes more universal.
Ps: I cannot modify the source codes. I am using compiled
Thank you Timo. You are great:)
2007/5/23, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:31 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 09:21 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I started getting this message this morning: May 21 09:13:14 mail
> > dovecot: imap-login: No
This revised proposal for a Feature Request is the result of my desire
to implement quotas, but not have the attendant headaches that
inevitably accompany its implementation.
Ok, seems there is no interest in doing this - and I do understand the
objections... but how about a more consistent m
On May 23, 2007 11:54:20 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMAP establishes a connection between the client and the server. Wouldn't
it be great if it could be a conduit to let custom Thunderbird plugins
talk to custom server application over the IMAP interface? For example,
persona
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 21:11 +0200, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote:
> why not use ssh for that purpose ?
You wouldn't necessarily want all your users to ssh into your mail
server, or deal with the configuration of that.
Doing it through dovecot means it's already locked down to some point.
I wonder if I cou
why not use ssh for that purpose ?
On 5/23/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
10 days ago I proposed this addition (see below) to Dovecot and got a
lot of positive response. I would like to make it happen. I'm willing to
contribute $500 to the development of this feature. It doesn't have
10 days ago I proposed this addition (see below) to Dovecot and got a
lot of positive response. I would like to make it happen. I'm willing to
contribute $500 to the development of this feature. It doesn't have to
be implemented perfectly but needs to be workable to the extent that I
can telnet
2007. May 23., Timo Sirainen:
> Currently the typical rejection message is:
>
> -
> Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery
> Agent.
>
> The following reason was given:
> Quota exceeded.
> -
>
> Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of
> > How is this different from just telling the customer there quota has
> > been increased by the size of their .oqt box?
>
> Because it hasn't - they can't GET this mail until they deal with their
> over-quota condition. All this does is prevent mail from being REJECTED,
> and provide a more c
Jan van den Berg wrote:
mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/mail/%1u/%2u/%u:INDEX=MEMORY
Of interest to you might be using a scratch disk space to store the
indexes on a/the local mail server; I just did a bit of math for you
(well ok, a 'bc' script did the math) and with 90.5gigs of email in
On Wed, 23 May 2007 08:59:29 -0500
"Brian G. Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 00:52 +0800, M1 wrote:
> >> Dear Timo,
> >>
> >> How about managedsieve?
> >
> > I think it'll have to wait for v2.0. Especially because I want it
> > to be distribut
How is this different from just telling the customer there quota has
been increased by the size of their .oqt box?
Because it hasn't - they can't GET this mail until they deal with their
over-quota condition. All this does is prevent mail from being REJECTED,
and provide a more consistent and
> This revised proposal for a Feature Request is the result of my desire
> to implement quotas, but not have the attendant headaches that
> inevitably accompany its implementation.
>
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > I have to face it, my users are retards:
>
> Is there any other kind of user? ;)
>
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:31 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 09:21 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I started getting this message this morning: May 21 09:13:14 mail
> > dovecot: imap-login: No authentication sockets found
..
> What Dovecot version? The error message means
hi!
i would appreciate to have some comments on my below scenario:
# from the config
userdb static {
args = uid=vmail gid=mail home=/vmail/%d/%n
}
namespace public {
separator = /
prefix = All/
location = maildir:/vmail/%d/all/Maildir:CONTROL=~/Maildir/control/
all:INDEX=~/Maildir/in
Hi Bill,
Anyway, the main thing is, this folder should be essentially hidden
from the user so they do *not* have access to it, and should
temporarily hold messages that come in that are unable to be delivered
due to an over-quota condition.
Would seem to me that this would then require quota
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 00:52 +0800, M1 wrote:
Dear Timo,
How about managedsieve?
I think it'll have to wait for v2.0. Especially because I want it to be
distributed in dovecot-sieve package, not in the main dovecot package.
This just isn't possible without the larger chang
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:36 +0200, Jan van den Berg wrote:
> About the indexes; this thoroughly confusing.
> I don't understand why Dovecot IMAP wants to use index files for a
> maildir++ implementation (this seems to defy the point of a maildir).
Hmm. I suppose I should write a wiki page about t
Charles Marcus wrote the following on 5/23/2007 4:30 AM -0800:
This revised proposal for a Feature Request is the result of my desire
to implement quotas, but not have the attendant headaches that
inevitably accompany its implementation.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have to face it, my users are r
Hi Timo,
Thanks a lot for the quick response (you sure are active on the list).
I wasn't aware of the PostLoginScript option I will sure give this a
try.
So from what I understand Dovecot isn't there yet either when it comes
to quota handling (maildirsize). I'll give it another thought on what
wil
Hi Timo,
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 16.05.2007 15:58:06:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dovecot: 2007-05-16 13:30:09 Error: IMAP(6126360): file
> > index-mail-headers.c:
> > line 260 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion failed: (part != NULL
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:58 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > dovecot: May 22 15:48:31 Error: auth(default): LDAP: ldap_start_tls_s()
> > failed: Can't contact LDAP server
>
> Does it manage to get a TCP connection at all (check with eg. tcpdump),
> or is the error message just bad?
I checked OpenL
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 12:57 +0200, Jan van den Berg wrote:
> I'm in the process of testing Dovecot to see whether it meets our needs
> to replace our current Courier setup which serves well over 100.000
> mailboxes (pop3 and imap: mysql with NFS)
> So far dovecot seems pretty straight forward; howe
This revised proposal for a Feature Request is the result of my desire
to implement quotas, but not have the attendant headaches that
inevitably accompany its implementation.
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I have to face it, my users are retards:
Is there any other kind of user? ;)
Thus I need a
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 00:52 +0800, M1 wrote:
> Dear Timo,
>
> How about managedsieve?
I think it'll have to wait for v2.0. Especially because I want it to be
distributed in dovecot-sieve package, not in the main dovecot package.
This just isn't possible without the larger changes that v2.0 brings
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> what's the plan for the 1.0 series?
> it'll be 1.0.x release soon and ofter or ...?
v1.0.1 will be released soon. I'm mostly just waiting to see if one
user's problems go away with
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/4e4572280ef1
If I d
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 08:39 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> Timo Sirainen spake the following on 5/22/2007 5:38 AM:
> > On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:09 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> >> # Protocols we want to be serving: imap imaps pop3 pop3s
> >> # If you only want to use dovecot-auth, you can set this to "n
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:27 +0200, David Obando wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to use shared folders but I'm not quite sure whether
> Dovecot supports it the way I want it:
>
> -user A should be able to share a folder with users B, C, D
> -B, C and D should have read-access to this folder
>
Currently the typical rejection message is:
-
Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent.
The following reason was given:
Quota exceeded.
-
Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of course
there sucky clients that can't display MD
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 18:54 +, aza zel wrote:
> hi...
> i trying to have a secure conetion between dovecot and directory server, but
> i cant do it. The documentation are so poor (
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP)
As it says there:
"FIXME: I'm not sure how the actual TLS configura
Hi,
(my first post to the list)
I'm in the process of testing Dovecot to see whether it meets our needs
to replace our current Courier setup which serves well over 100.000
mailboxes (pop3 and imap: mysql with NFS)
So far dovecot seems pretty straight forward; however I ran into a
couple of thing
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Webmail.us will be sponsoring my Dovecot development for this summer.
> Other companies are also welcome to participate in the costs.
> Participation gets you:
>
> - listed in Credits in www.dovecot.org
> - listed in AUTHORS file
> - you can tell me how you want to use
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 08:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I have to face it, my users are retards:
>
> * either they're using crap MUAs which will not display their quota to them
> * or they're using POP with "leave mail on server" and will never
> notice their quota, unless it's too late
> *
On 5/22/2007 Charles Marcus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Now, obviously, this would all have to be configurable (I'm guessing
this would all live in the Quota Plugin - or maybe it would be an
alternate Quota plugin) - off by default, etc...
Also, let me be clear... I am not the 'sys admin from
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:35 -0700, Dehnert James Sr wrote:
> Can I define where dovecot.pid should be in the config file on 1.0.0?
>
> Nothing is being written to /var/run/dovecot,
base_dir setting. It's probably now being written
to /usr/local/var/run/dovecot if you installed from sources.
> e
Hi list,
> OpenLDAP uses another strategy, which is more robust aka needs less
> fragile interaction between the servers.
We have been thinking very long about replication. The requirement
is to have a backup computing center in distant location, so
replication has to work over a WAN connection
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:04:11PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yes, there were some problems with it. I think it should work now once
> DNS caches expire (max. 20h). Although I don't get it why the A record
> doesn't disappear from .org root servers. But looks like it doesn't
> cause problems
51 matches
Mail list logo
