Craig,
Yes rsyncing the Maildirs/ will work - be sure to get your recursion
options right though. Personally I prefer to exempt the dovecot* files from
the rsync, and let them be recreated fresh on the new installation.
Regards
__
Dean Manners
>
I currently have Dovecot running on a SuSE SLES 10 mail server with postfix as
the MTA and a number of real linux users. I have postfix delivering to Maildir
records. We are going to convert to a virtual user/domain system with
PostfixAdmin. I have checked out all of our settings and they app
Hi all.
I spent some time testing Dovecot's LDA sieve plugin and found problem
with "notify" method.
In fact it always returns "generic sieve error"... and thus produces
bounce messages like this:
-
Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent.
The following reason
Marc Perkel schrieb:
> Remember even if you don't get everything right by tomorrow there's
> always version 1.01. There will always be bugs and new features to add.
I do hope Timo will leave bugs and features to the HEAD branch and save
the fixes for 1.0.X :-) [1]
Anyways, to Timo - good luck wit
Remember even if you don't get everything right by tomorrow there's
always version 1.01. There will always be bugs and new features to add.
The LDAP_DEPRECATED define should have fixed these. Maybe your ldap.h
doesn't have the deprecated functions at all for some reason? Or did I
somehow mess up applying the deprecated-patch. :)
rc32 builds cleanly for me (only a few minor warnings) and seems to be
running well.
Thanks!
-Ben
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 18:58 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> Well, it builds OK for me on Solaris 8 32-bit SPARC with OpenLDAP 2.3,
> with less complaints from gcc (3.3.2), just:-
>
> mail-index.c: In function `mail_index_parse_extensions':
> mail-index.c:343: warning: comparison between signed and u
Well, it builds OK for me on Solaris 8 32-bit SPARC with OpenLDAP 2.3,
with less complaints from gcc (3.3.2), just:-
mail-index.c: In function `mail_index_parse_extensions':
mail-index.c:343: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
mail-index.c: In function `mail_index_map_clone':
mail-ind
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc32.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc32.tar.gz.sig
Pretty late for changes if v1.0 is supposed to come out tomorrow, but I
can't really leave these LDAP bugs unfixed. They shouldn't anyway break
anything, so here's one more day for you peopl
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 12:33 -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
> I've noticed that if a user's maildir gets created by deliver or
> pop/imap without the convert plugin running, the maildir structure is
> fine (no maildirfolder file). But, if a user gets converted, there is a
> maildirfolder file in th
Thank you Timo. You have been extremely helpful in this.
> -Original Message-
> From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 10:39 AM
> To: Jason Warner
> Cc: 'Jason Warner'; 'Dovecot Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Connection refused with auth-mast
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:12 -0600, Jason Warner wrote:
> > Anyway I should be able to figure out the assert by looking at the
> > code too. Just a bit more difficult, since a couple of minutes wasn't
> > enough. :)
This should fix it:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2007-April/008653.html
si
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:43 +0200, Emiliano Gabrielli (aka AlberT)
wrote:
>
> yea, but I have the same issue with log files ... and I don't like to
> make the
> logs readable by anyone not being root ... It's impossible to run the
> deliver
> in postfix without changing the logs owner ???
If y
I've noticed that if a user's maildir gets created by deliver or
pop/imap without the convert plugin running, the maildir structure is
fine (no maildirfolder file). But, if a user gets converted, there is a
maildirfolder file in the user's base maildir directory. As far as I can
tell, that does
On 4/12/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:50 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on the same
> connection in an asynchronous manner, then the server behavior as per
> RFC4511 is undefined, since a server is not
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.4.2007, at 20.31, Tim Alberts wrote:
Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default): dovecot-auth:
../../../libraries/liblber/io.c:491: ber_get_next: Assertion
`ber->ber_buf == ((void *)0)' failed.
Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default):
pam(secretuser,192.168.0.2
Hello Timo and others..
14:09 mail:~# dovecot --version
1.0.rc31
Install prefix .. :
/usr/local
File offsets : 64bit
I/O loop method . : poll
File change notification method . : inotify
Building wi
I'll apply the patch later this morning and and let you know what I see.
For what it's worth, last night I started dumping traffic between
dovecot and openldap. The pattern I see most consistently was this:
-> bind request (anonymous)
-> search request
<- bind response
<- search result
As I un
Hi List
Looks like OpenLDAP 2.3 doesn't define LDAP_DEPRECATED [1] anymore which
causes a few warnings in Gentoo [2].
Attached is a patch that re-defines this so that dovecot can continue
using simple functions like ldap_bind().
Thanks
Roy
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg0
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:50 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on the same
> connection in an asynchronous manner, then the server behavior as per
> RFC4511 is undefined, since a server is not supposed to be willing to
> handle operations intermixe
20 matches
Mail list logo
