On Sat, 08 Jun 2019 11:51:00 +0100
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> > > It seems more likely that the NAS is doing unwanted fiddling,
> > > perhaps based on client IP address, and serving up different
> > > results. You need to poke about its GUI and beat it into shape.
> >
> >
Hi Tim,
> > It seems more likely that the NAS is doing unwanted fiddling,
> > perhaps based on client IP address, and serving up different
> > results. You need to poke about its GUI and beat it into shape.
>
> There was a change when a router swap went badly wrong, but it
> normally
On Sat, 08 Jun 2019 10:34:35 +0100
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> > But now I am completely confused. We had a power cut overnight and I
> > have just turned the nas back on again and I can access all the folder
> > on the NAS from Linux which previously I was not able to. Not sure
> > r
Hi Tim,
> But now I am completely confused. We had a power cut overnight and I
> have just turned the nas back on again and I can access all the folder
> on the NAS from Linux which previously I was not able to. Not sure
> really what is going on but rebooting the NAS seems to have resolved
> a
On Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:49:04 +0100
Terry Coles wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 June 2019 21:43:44 BST tim wrote:
> > My apologies for the lack of replies but I have been ill with a dose of sore
> > throat from hell
> >
> > Since my last message I realised that I had not checked the situation with
> > my
On Thursday, 6 June 2019 21:43:44 BST tim wrote:
> My apologies for the lack of replies but I have been ill with a dose of sore
> throat from hell
>
> Since my last message I realised that I had not checked the situation with
> my Windows PC, (I barely use it now a days, it runs headless and I use
My apologies for the lack of replies but I have been ill with a dose of sore
throat from hell
Since my last message I realised that I had not checked the situation with my
Windows PC, (I barely
use it now a days, it runs headless and I use rdp to connect onto it when I do
need it).
I was surp
Hi Tim,
> > > I have a NAS on my network and is accessed by two people [using
> > > NFS] and controlled by UAC set on the NAS.
> >
> > That `UAC', user-access control, sounds a bit worrying.
More so now.
> mit@andora:~$ id -u; id -ru; id -g; id -G
> 1000
> 1000
> 1000
> 1000
On Sun, 02 Jun 2019 10:58:07 +0100
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> > I have a NAS on my network and is accessed by two people [using NFS]
> > and controlled by UAC set on the NAS.
>
> That `UAC', user-access control, sounds a bit worrying.
>
> > The NAS folder was setup with Group set as
Hi Tim,
> I have a NAS on my network and is accessed by two people [using NFS]
> and controlled by UAC set on the NAS.
That `UAC', user-access control, sounds a bit worrying.
> The NAS folder was setup with Group set as no group and user set as no
> user with Owner, Group and Other set to RW for
Evening all
I have a NAS on my network and is accessed by two people and controlled by UAC
set on the NAS.
The NAS is mounted on /media/nas via an entry in the fstab with the file type
set to nfs
The fstab entry on both my wifes and my PC is as follows:
192.168.1.150:volume1/Data
11 matches
Mail list logo
