Hello everybody,
Dolibarr team is currently at Paris for "Solutions Linux & open source".
I met Enalean, the company behind Tuleap which used for
https://doliforge.org
I discussed with them about this software and our usage... When I saw we
are blocked because of old OS version (i386 vs x64),
Hi
Great proposal, if doliforge can evolve it's a great idea. I think is
mainly a doli-team choice. As user I can tell only, I'm not gone on
doliforge since many months.
Km
___
Dolibarr-dev mailing list
Dolibarr-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/
Is it a problem to migrate to a 64 bit OS?
Regards, Marcos.
El 20/05/2014 17:31, "Jean-François Ferry" escribió:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Dolibarr team is currently at Paris for "Solutions Linux & open source". I
> met Enalean, the company behind Tuleap which used for
> https://doliforge.org
> I d
Hey,
Looks like a good offer.
We could handle the platform by ourselves. The big problem is the data
migration.
Using their SaaS offer would allow us to focus on our core priority which
is Dolibarr, not handling the project's infrastructure.
If you can settle an agreement including the data migr
It can be nice.
But what happens to the independance of the fundation platform ?
We discus during the devcamp about using GitHub as bug/issues trackers,
and we decide to not go this way to keep indepence of fundation. Ok,
GitHub is not Open-Source, and it's a major point do not go with it.
Tul
Why didn't you guys think about Launchpad? It is maintained by Canonical
and free for open source projects.
It is also used by major projects... I would like to know your position
about it.
Excuse me if I am being a little bit annoying.
Regards, Marcos.
El 20/05/2014 21:33, "Florian HENRY"
escr
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Marcos García wrote:
> Why didn't you guys think about Launchpad? It is maintained by Canonical
> and free for open source projects.
>
> It is also used by major projects... I would like to know your position
> about it.
>
> Excuse me if I am being a little bit an
Sourceforge.net is not possible because goal of doliforge is to provide a
solution for external editor to have a solution to manage development of
their own dolibarr module.
Such developers can decide to use on their own sf of course, but for editor
that are selling modules on dolistore, some of th
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Destailleur Laurent wrote:
> Sourceforge.net is not possible because goal of doliforge is to provide a
> solution for external editor to have a solution to manage development of
> their own dolibarr module.
> Such developers can decide to use on their own sf of cou
