Hi all,
For me it's only a matter of time before going to use vagrant box in my
dev cycle.
May be we can have a little demo during next devcamps how to set it up
and how to use it (I know all documentation is available on internet...)
Put this project inside dolibarr github project will be
Well, I don't think it is really my choice - I don't really care.
It depends if you think it is useful enough to bring it as a Dolibarr
official development box or not... AFAIK only Raphaël and me use it, so I
don't know if it is relevant enough.
Regards,
*Marcos García*
marcos...@gmail.com
Marcos, what do you prefer: keeping projet into your repo (as it is, so i
removed from obsolete) or having it into a Dolibarr/vagrant vagrant inside
Dolibarr project (so i will create a new project and give your permission) ?
2014-12-29 15:02 GMT+01:00 Doursenaud, Raphaël
:
> Laurent, you co
Laurent, you could just create a Dolibarr/vagrant repo and give the admin
rights to Marcos.
This way it would make it more discoverable for contributors.
The box is really usefull to have a common testing ground for multiple
developers ruling out workstation misconfiguration.
My 2 cents.
2014-12-
I'll recommend you removing it from obsolete repo. It is not useful to have
it there because not updating it makes it unusable.
It doesn't take too much time to maintain it. I use it every day so I don't
really bother taking charge of it. Also, in case I stop maintaining it, PR
are accepted :/
Re
I moved it into repo "obsolete" of dolibarr foundation.
I think this means i can removed it.
I prefer having this projet maintan by someone else than the dolibarr core
team. So your repo would be THE repo of dolibarr vagrant ? Do you agree
with that ?
2014-12-25 18:01 GMT+01:00 Marcos García :
>
Hi all,
Since Dolibarr 3.7 is not carrying a vagrant machine anymore, I've created
a repo with a Vagrant machine configured for Dolibarr development at
github.com/marcosgdf/dolibarr-vagrant
Feel free to use it!
Regards,
*Marcos García*
marcos...@gmail.com
2014-11-18 11:27 GMT+01:00 Doursena
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
Yeah, maintaining it under it's own repository is probably a good idea, but
I think it should be provided under the Dolibarr organisation.
When I created the box, I didn't expect the field to be moving so quickly
and I'm not investing much time maintaining it because
I don't use and don't know enough vagrant to decide. But (without nothing,
so my opinion is probably wrong) I would prefer also to have this into
another repository.
Raphael, what do you think about this ?
2014-10-31 10:49 GMT+01:00 Marcos García :
> And...
>
> What about moving the Vagrant bo
And...
What about moving the Vagrant box to an independent dolibarr repo and using
relative directories to access the dolibarr code? Like having the following
directory tree:
/dolibarr/
/dolibarr-vagrant (vagrant will serve ../dolibarr/htdocs
files)
We are releasing versions with a vagrant box t
2014-07-18 1:17 GMT+02:00 Marcos García :
> What problems can we have if we use submodules for this?
They require some specific knowledge that could confuse our contributors.
Also, I'm pretty sure they don't work nicely with egit (Eclipse's git in
java, yuck…) used by some major members of the co
What problems can we have if we use submodules for this?
I was also thinking about vagrantcloud and creating a Vagrantfile that
refers to a previously out-of-the-box VM but bandwidth is not free :/
Regards,
*Marcos García*
marcos...@gmail.com
2014-07-15 9:34 GMT+02:00 Doursenaud, Raphaël :
I agree that the vagrant code should be maintained separately but I
strongly advise you to not use submodules. They are a pain to maintain and
get in the way very often.
2014-07-14 18:28 GMT+02:00 Sasa Ostrouska :
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Marcos García
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all:
>>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Marcos García wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I don't know if many of you do use Dolibarr's vagrant box. If you don't,
> then I encourage you to use it.
>
> Because Dolibarr usually has an old version of puphpet's box that may or
> not build correctly, I was thinking of ext
14 matches
Mail list logo
