https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56121
--- Comment #4 from Mike Rumph ---
Rich,
I see that you checked in a change to mod_fcgid.xml in r1602717.
I was able to build (generate) mod_fcgid.html, mod_fgcid.html.en and
mod_fcgid.xml.meta by a round about method.
I copied
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Javier Llorente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31364|0 |1
is obsolete
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695
Bug ID: 56695
Summary: Doc error on option %O for mod_logio
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.9
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #1 from dajo...@gmail.com ---
It may be worth mentioning how this was found and some history behind it, which
can be found in this Mozilla bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=990603
--
You are receiving this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985
Bug ID: 56985
Summary: Clarify which IndexOptions require FancyIndexing
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57077
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Component
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57109
Bug ID: 57109
Summary: GPG verification examples are wrong
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.4
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57109
Sebb changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://httpd.apache.org/dow
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57077
--- Comment #4 from ugur ---
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/flood/trunk/ flood
It is still the same
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189
Bug ID: 57189
Summary: Norwegian translation of Apache's error pages
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
--- Comment #3 from Tom Fredrik Blenning ---
Would it not be better to use UTF-8 for this, and rid the translation of all
the entities? I see all except 2 languages already uses UTF-8?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48460
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Documentation |Documentation
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48460
Rainer Jung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
Bug ID: 57584
Summary: AddHandler etc. documentation "extension" unintuitive
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
S
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57654
Bug ID: 57654
Summary: Browsers can't display html documentation pages
correctly (versions 2.0, 2.2, 2.4)
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.10
Hardwar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57654
André Malo changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from André Malo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57654
André Malo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57654
André Malo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57722
Bug ID: 57722
Summary: Gendered Pronoun in Development Guide
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: Other
OS: other
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57722
--- Comment #1 from Rich Bowen ---
There's several other instances of the same thing in that doc. Applying your
patch, and fixing the others, also.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57722
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug ID: 5
Summary: Security concerns with documentation of AddHandler
(and multiple file extensions)
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
Bug ID: 57778
Summary: Effect of AddType should be documented in more detail
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
--- Comment #1 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
Update: With Apache 2.4 the line
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php5 .phtml
does get my PHP files executed, I verified.
That's not documented at [1]. Please document it. Than
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336
--- Comment #2 from Rich Bowen ---
This looks like two separate tickets to me. Working on the first part -
documenting how to do it. But it seems that the other bit - teaching
mod_deflate new tricks - is a good thing too.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22005
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Rich Bowen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336
--- Comment #3 from Rich Bowen ---
Added RewriteRule version to trunk in r1673470. Will rewrite this with
once I get a test-case running.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53530
Rodent of Unusual Size changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.5-HEAD|2.2-HEAD
--- Comment #3 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336
--- Comment #4 from Rich Bowen ---
Opened https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 for to track
rewriting this using
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813
Bug ID: 57813
Summary: Rewrite 'pre-compressed content' recipe using 2.4
metaphors
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51959
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Rich Bowen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #9 from Rich Bowen ---
r1673487 clarifies a DirectoryMatch example.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #10 from Rich Bowen ---
FWIW, I disagree with using the ?: syntax in the regular expressions. This
isn't a regex tutorial, and using advanced regex techniques clouds the issue
for people that are trying to learn httpd synt
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #11 from Christoph Anton Mitterer ---
Well I think one could add a one liner, describing what this is about, but
apart from that I'd use the better version.
The reason is simply, that people will take these example patterns
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #12 from Rich Bowen ---
Yeah, it's a good point.
I'm torn between "simplest possible example that works" and "best practice",
when best practice requires significant additional explanation of regul
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #13 from Rich Bowen ---
I've patched a bunch of different places, but I haven't yet done the (?:$|/)
stuff.
So, I'm going to leave this ticket open for now, because I lack time to
complete it thoroughly.
To summar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53530
--- Comment #4 from Rich Bowen ---
I think (at least last time I checked) we have quotes in all of our examples. I
think also that the syntax highlight stuff in the docs doesn't render unquoted
arguments properly.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53349
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #14 from Christoph Anton Mitterer ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #12)
> I'll see if I can find a way to phrase it so that it doesn't simply confuse.
> Thanks for your remarks.
Maybe one should provide a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #15 from Rich Bowen ---
Yes, I think I'd like to do that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53530
--- Comment #5 from Rich Bowen ---
r1673804 adds a brief note about when you may/must use quotes in directory
paths. It would be worth having a "conventions" document that discusses stuff
like this that spans multiple directives,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57817
Bug ID: 57817
Summary: contributors list out of date
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57077
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57817
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985
--- Comment #1 from Rich Bowen ---
Looks like it's
SuppressLastModified
SuppressSize
SuppressDescription
SuppressRules
XHTML
IconsAreLinks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153
--- Comment #2 from Filipus Klutiero ---
Thank you Rich.
Just to be clear, I have changed job since I filed this and haven't had to use
mod_rewrite in 3 years, so I'm even less clear on what the documentation should
read. On the oth
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55990
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55990
Mike Rumph changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SetEnv vs. =! |SetEnv vs. =! inconsistency
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57819
Bug ID: 57819
Summary: Need a conventions document
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #1 from Rich Bowen ---
Fixed the FilesMatch so that it no longer matches the file '.cgi' in r1673954
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from Rich Bowen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57819
--- Comment #1 from Rodent of Unusual Size ---
Oh, and come up with (and use) some consistent argument-type keywords, like
* FILE-PATH (and describe in the user conventions that these are ServerRoot-
relative if not absolute)
* KEYWORD
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #3 from Tim B ---
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_mime.html#multipleext seems clear to
me.
The httpd documentation is aimed at technically minded people rather than end
users of websites.
In >6 years of commerc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #4 from Rodent of Unusual Size ---
An alternative also widely in use is "suffix". Does Guillaume d'Occam like
that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #5 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #2)
> whatever.tar.gz files, for example, have been around forever, and tar and gz
> are talked about as the two file extensions.
One could also sa
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #6 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #1)
> Fixed the FilesMatch so that it no longer matches the file '.cgi' in r1673954
Is that change meant to be about hidden file in general? I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364
--- Comment #2 from Rich Bowen ---
Clarification requested: There's no such thing as mod_fcgid in 2.4
I know this ticket has been out there a really long time, and it looks like an
easy fix if it's still relevant.
--
You are rece
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364
--- Comment #3 from Rich Bowen ---
Yes, I'm picking nits. There is, of course,
http://httpd.apache.org/mod_fcgid/mod/mod_fcgid.html which is outside of the
main httpd tree.
Just trying to clarify if you're talking about that
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #7 from Rich Bowen ---
Well, yes, that's true, if ... improbable.
I'm always reluctant to make simple docs into regex soup for the sake of a
bizarre edge case like "...cgi" Do you feel that's really a co
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #8 from Rich Bowen ---
I've extended this to [^.]+\.cgi in r1674099
Does that address the concern?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from Rich Bowen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #11 from Rich Bowen ---
Is this still an issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #12 from Dirkjan Ochtman ---
Insofar as I can see, the documentation still don't set the character encoding
in the HTML 5-approved way, so IMO there is still something to be solved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
André Malo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
André Malo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #13 from Christophe JAILLET ---
Fixed in r1674382
Backported in 2.4, 2.2 and 2.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #9 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #8)
> I've extended this to [^.]+\.cgi in r1674099
>
> Does that address the concern?
It should protect against execution of
* hidden files an
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #11 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #10)
> Thanks. Closing.
I'm actually not sure if the core of this bug is fixed yet.
The core as shown by the title is that the documentation on &qu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #12 from Chris Pennello ---
(In reply to sebastian from comment #11)
> Chris, where are you? :)
Hello. :]
> (In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #10)
> > Thanks. Closing.
>
> I'm actually not sure if
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55990
--- Comment #9 from Dan Jacobson ---
OK I'll take your word for it that this is all a thing of the past.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Javier Llorente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Javier Llorente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31728|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
--- Comment #5 from Javier Llorente ---
Created attachment 32677
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32677&action=edit
New patch
Most of my old patch was already applied on trunk. Here I am attaching a new
one with t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
--- Comment #6 from Rich Bowen ---
Applied to trunk in r1675420
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53530
--- Comment #6 from Eric Covener ---
Any sense in keeping this open?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53530
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
--- Comment #8 from Tom Fredrik Blenning ---
Just reiterating my previous comment, is there any reason the Spanish
translation cannot be in UTF-8, and is using html entities?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
--- Comment #9 from Rich Bowen ---
No. No reason at all. I don't have the expertise/tools to make that change. If
you wanted to supply a patch, I'd gleefully apply it. :-) Should I reopen?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Tom Fredrik Blenning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55089
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55100
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55100
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
--- Comment #3 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #2)
> thanks for the report. I've added a note in trunk and 2.4 about the legacy
> type-as-handler stuff.
Thanks for your work on this matter.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
--- Comment #4 from Eric Covener ---
updated in r1675471, trunk only for now. I've tried to lead with the short form
and warn at the end.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
--- Comment #5 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #4)
> updated in r1675471, trunk only for now. I've tried to lead with the short
> form and warn at the end.
A lot better now.
For the
Configur
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57874
Bug ID: 57874
Summary: Spelling typo in ab manual
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57874
Nirgal Vourgère changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57874
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Tom Fredrik Blenning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
801 - 900 of 1745 matches
Mail list logo
