Hypertext links should not be underlined by the style. That is a
browser preference item that is typically turned off by people who
know the option exists.
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
at http://cvs.apache.org/~kess/programs/ you'll find a draft for a
configure script documentation. There are still some open ends - mostly
commented within the xml file - and there might be a lot of typos and
spelling mistakes, but it is ready for a review now...
It would be fine, if someone could
Nobody every really answered the question of whether the license
boilerplate reference text should be in html docs generated from xml.
(Clearly it should be contained in a comment in the xml source.)
My suggestion is not to put the boilerplate in an html comment, but
rather
to put:
"Copyright 200
On Sep 29, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 9/22/06, Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This has come up before, so no doubt some folks have already made up
their minds, having seen the subject line.
I don't have any problem with this, as long as there is one oth
On Oct 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, Tony Stevenson wrote:
Can you please add me to the list of moderators too?
I will be helping Rich, and the rest maintain the data on the new
wiki site.
Cheers
Tony
Done. It would have been better to have Rich request it on your behalf,
since it took me a while
On Oct 24, 2006, at 6:11 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
The following page has been changed by megaspaz:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Recipes/TomcatReverseProxy
The comment on the change is:
Added code block for situations where proxy forbidden
errors happen
On Jul 23, 2007, at 1:23 AM, André Malo wrote:
* Nóirín Plunkett wrote:
On 7/23/07, Chris Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
===
--- mod_ssl.xml(revision 545655)
+++ mod_ssl.xml(working copy)
@@ -519,21 +519,21
On Jul 23, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
An argument can be made that something "has depreciated",
but it is never the case that something "has been depreciated".
Heh, I should never say never this early on a Monday morning.
A counter-example has already been pr
On Jul 23, 2007, at 1:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: noodl
Date: Mon Jul 23 01:30:32 2007
New Revision: 558654
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=558654
Log:
Backport 558651 from trunk
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.html.en
httpd/httpd/br
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/01/2007 05:39 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
to say "gateway" in our documentation?
At the minimum, I plan to notate "reverse-proxy (e.g. gateway
server)"
liberal
On Aug 2, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Tony Stevenson wrote:
Thumbs,
Thanks, I have just looked at Cream (cream.sourceforge.net) which
comes with Vim. Neither of these show any malformed characters, or
the BOM.
I'll look at vim too then.
I was doing that and found out that vim now handles BOM auto
tside site that is trying to associate itself with
our projects by using the Apache name without prior written permission.
That fact is independent of any other discussion about whether a
specific individual can edit our wiki.
....Roy T. Fielding (speaking with hat of V.P., Apache H
On 31/12/2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately, you can't have clashing (multiple) Limit's (or
LimitExcepts)
in the context of a single directory. (Of course Limit is so
broken in
such respects that it needs to be redone from the ground up).
Why not? That
On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
I don't think so. Maybe I am going blind, but I find that style very
hard to read. I prefer the larger font, white backgrou
On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
I know all these arguments, and I'm not going to get into them, except
to say that the vast majority of websites on the internet share every
one of these "flaws". Two small changes to the CSS got rid of the
font-size and reflow issue, as you can se
On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
What are you talking about Roy? I don't want to get into this
argument, but just checking one of the those three example sites (the
last one), I found all three of the "flaws" that Nick was after: does
not reflow properly for very-small screens, se
On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
The pages you pointed to as examples used <100% for their default text
fonts (at least the ones I checked). If you're trying to make an
empirical argument, start by checking the data.
I looked at the characters on screen. I don't care if the cha
On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
We are all very busy people, and this kind of bike shedding doesn't
get us anywhere.
We have a defined process for resolving paint colors for bike sheds.
We only use it when there is disagreement. The only time this stuff
blows up is when people
On Apr 25, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
The way I should have phrased it is this: When people who aren't
working on a particular documentation issue try to control how it is
done, it takes the fun out of it for me.
You lost me there. If you define a documentation task as a one-person
On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Takashi Sato wrote:
Hum, so since build.sh, lib/DocUtil.pm, lib/metafile.pl, and lib/
allmodules.pl were modified
after Jul 11 2006 do we have to update Licence headers in them?
Please go ahead and update them, along with anything else that has the
old headers. We
On Jul 12, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:58:52 +0200
Lucien GENTIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi to all,
Because of an update of content-negotiation.xml, here's a patch
against content-negotiation.xml.fr - 2.2.x branch.
Thanks. I've committed that, together with
On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Vincent Bray wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 12:03, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> On 3/29/2011 3:36 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
while the committee is;
aaron ben bjh bnicholes bojan brianm chrisd chuck coar colm covener dirkx
dougm erikabele
fielding f
On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we retire (ie, svn delete) translations in 2.4 that
> are more than, say, 2 years out of date, as they assuredly don't reflect the
> current state of things, and do a disservice to our customers. Leaving them
> in trunk s
> On Aug 18, 2021, at 12:21 AM, Piotr Sionkowski
> wrote:
>
> Hello httpd docs @ Apache Software Foundation,
>
> I am writing this e-mail to learn more about ASF attitude towards presenting
> or hiding httpd server version details in headers.
>
> I have read the FAQ and documentation and ag
24 matches
Mail list logo
