good source of
helpful advice.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author - Apache Administrator's Guide
http://www.ApacheAdmin.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that 2.0 is the preferred version, it seems that /docs should now go
to the 2.0 docs, while the 1.3 docs should be demoted to a less
convenient URL like /docs-1.3, with the /docs-2.0 URL still working,
going to the expected place. Anyone else think that's a good idea?
--
Rich Bowen
A
oted to a less
> >> convenient URL like /docs-1.3, with the /docs-2.0 URL still working,
> >> going to the expected place. Anyone else think that's a good idea?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rich Bowen
> >> Apache - mod_perl - Perl - CGI
> &
I just ran across this: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/vif-info
Even assuming that this is still correct (note the date on the note) is
it appropriate to keep it in the documentation?
--
And everyone said, "If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve -
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!"
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
> Well, they are still interested and are offering us one of
> the following options:
>
> 1. Translation is done by us; MITP does the spelling review;
> 2. Like 1., but translation is sponsored by MITP,
> 3. MITP takes care of everything;
I think that I
ike the
>
> it is is
>
> 469
> snews port (563) are enabled. Use the AllowCONNECT
> -directive to overrride this default and allow connections to
> the listed ports only.
>
> s/overrride/override/;
Many thanks. Fixed.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and anot
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> OK. It's time to get this problem solved.
>
> At the moment, the new xml system is an obstacle to proper doc maintenance
> rather than an aid. This needs to be fixed pronto. I had hoped to remain
> XSLT-software agnostic and just let people use what the
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> >>1. We need a simple system so that people with no xslt knowledge can still
> >>write docs.
>
> > I am not clear why this is a problem. Mozilla und
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 07:28:37AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Agreed, but if most of the developers were to use an XML browser, the
> > conversion could be done, say, once a week, by someone with the
> > know-how, rather than
hange descriptions,
and feature additions (when was a feature added to Apache).
Last year Rich Bowen tried to start the effort by writing a draft for
the Apache history, but response was sparse and discussions died out.
The draft is available from
http://www.drbacchus.com/apache_history.html>
Th
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Call for comments
>
> Apache History Project
>
> We are a few people that are of the opinion that saving a piece of
> history is very important. That is why we have drafted this call for
> comments. We want to save as much of Apache&
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> Pretty much the first thing I did in the documentation project was to
> fight hard to get index-bytype added to the modules directory. Now I
> think it might not be necessary any longer. We have greatly improved the
> cross-referencing inside the docs
;ll ask differently - Why would you want to use ChildPerUserId
rathr than AssignUserId? Or are they used somehow in conjunction with one
another? Comments in the docs indicate that more explanation is
necessary, and I'm trying
> From: Alton Harkcom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Apache Platforms and History
> Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 22:37:51 -0400
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in learning more
> about the History of Apache. In
> particular the beginnings. What
> devices were apache driven and ho
is due to your server logs
> being rotated.
>
>
> I know that I had a question about this. I also know that I found quite a few
> similar questions via google.com. So, I thought it might warrant an addition
> to your FAQ.
>
>
> Thanks for all your hard work with the docume
operation to
mod_cgi. The only exception is the
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefknot.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
combination with
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ssl/ssl_glossary.html )?
Yes, I think that would be a very useful thing to have.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one
Dog Years (
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/directives.html lists
MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers twice. Would one consider this to be a
problem? It's because it appears in mod_common and mod_netware.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefkno
o remember
several different ways to do this?
I know it is a little late to start bitching about this, but I've been
just using Mozilla as an xml viewer up til now.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kenya.rcbowen.com/
-
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Now that Mozilla is refusing to display XML, I tried the conversion
> > processe.
>
> I'd really like to figure out why this isn't working in Mozilla. Is it
> just the apache docs, or is mozilla
no diffs. We seem to be ok. Sorry for the false
alarm.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author - Apache Administrator's Guide
http://www.ApacheAdmin.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone give some examples of the various ways in which
RequestHeader might get used? Looks handy, but I could not figure out
specific example configuration directives.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > Acked, but I won't be able to get to it for quite a while. Anyone else
> > want to take this one?
>
> I have a few things that I wanted to add to the FAQ, so I'll ta
What is the general consensus regarding 1.3 docs and keeping them up to
date with patches applied to the 2.0 docs? Of course, this would mean a
lot of manual patching of the 1.3 docs, as 2.0 patches are sure not to
apply automatically.
--
Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of earth
And danced the
mples would be helpful.
Thanks
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:37:03PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Can someone give some examples of the various ways in which
> > RequestHeader might get used? Looks handy, but I could not figure out
> > specific example configuration
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:17:32PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > What is the general consensus regarding 1.3 docs and keeping them up to
> > date with patches applied to the 2.0 docs? Of course, this would mean a
> > lot of manua
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > The FAQ that I wanted to add goes something like this:
> >
> > Q: How do I deny access to images if they are not inline in one of my
> > pages.
>
> >
> > SetEnvI
che just had a nice idea for providing
username.hostname.com for all users on a system. mod_vhost_alias and a
little DNS wildcard entry are ideal for this. Perhaps some examples of
this in the doc would be good.
Anyways, I'll be tinkering in the vhosts docs for the next few days, so
if anyone has
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > rbowen 2002/06/15 13:09:08
> >
> > Modified:docs/manual/vhosts fd-limits.html.en
> > Log:
> > Added configuration example, code example, and a little explanation, to
> > facilitate logging all of your virtual
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, [ISO-8859-15] Astrid Keßler wrote:
>
> > I think all of your ideas are good, with the exception of removing the
> > mod_rewrite mass-virtual hosting.
>
> I strongly agree with Joshua. Please don't remove such further
> descriptions. Maybe put them into a section 'specials' or
Here's cut one:
http://www.apacheadmin.com/vhost_examples.html
I still don't like it, but I can't quite put my finger on what I
dislike.
I'm also planning to add a "Common problems" section.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Complaints?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTE
gs
any further than necessary. Can you provide a simple-as-possible example
for inclusion?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefknot.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:41:17PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > http://www.apacheadmin.com/vhost_examples.html
>
> Looks OK to me so far. A suggestion: One of the questions I have seen
> a number of times on c.i.w.s.u is about
ing
> them elsewhere.
Added a note to this effect, and will add the suggested example in the
next version. I'll go ahead and commit what I have, so that folks can be
tinkering with it, and nobody is waiting on me. I will probably work on
this a little on the ro
ader, as we
are not keen on helping you do something that is intrinsically a bad
idea.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author - Apache Administrator's Guide
http://www.ApacheAdmin.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
that will give more information when the paragraph or two is
insufficient.
Thoughts? Comments?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kenya.rcbowen.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Carlos wrote:
Re:
> >> Second question. Is there any thought that we will have a 2.0 FAQ and a
> >> 1.3 FAQ, as separate documents, or are we sticking to just the one for
> >> now?
> Just a thought, why not create a single file with an attribute like
> applies_to and then use
ven occurred to the people that are asking this
question, and it would seem to be detrimental to suggest it to them. The
general thing that I want to communicate to these people is that they
are asking the wrong question.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We g
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
>
> > "I have one IP address, and want host three web sites on my
> > server. What should I do?" This is more the format in which
> > people are thinking, and the example names like "Simple name-
> > based vhosting" and "More complicated
fact what this directive does, in what way would that be
useful? This is not in the context of a virtual host, but I'm just
saying that a particular child process will run with certain privileges?
Why would I want to do that? Can someone give an example where this is
desirable?
Thanks.
--
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> I believe that people don't use features because they
> are there, but because they need them.
The features are there because people need them. This seems like a
rather strange distinction to make, but I *think* I follow what you are
sa
discussion on users@
And, yes, I'll make a similar change to the 2.0 docs, when I have a
couple more tuits.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.226 +20 -11httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/mod/core.html.en
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles aro
failed, and generated more duplication and confusion than
anything else.
I'll poke at the logs document a bit, but I'm not sure that this needs
to stay in the STATUS doc any more. Comments?
--
Rich Bowen
Apache - mod_perl - Perl - CGI
http://www.ApacheAdmin.com/
---
>
> Chris
>
> At 8:38 AM -0400 2002/07/04, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> >> * Tutorial on "log files in apache"
> >>- Rich has kindy donated the "4-p
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Erik Abele wrote:
> It seems that HTTP_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR.html.var is missing a sentence in
> the english part.
>
> In the first if-clause only the error message is echoed out; shouldn't we
> provide an introducing sentence like "The server encountered an internal
> error a
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > It also seems that
> > my goal of putting this sort of stuff in a howto/ subdirectory has
> > largely failed, and generated more duplication and confusion than
> > anything else.
t might be
useful to debunk this misconception a few more places in the docs, as a
lot of people seem to think this.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one
Dog Years (Rush -
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Francis Daly wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:04:01AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> Somewhat hijacking the thread, because this is more to do with the
> second point raised that the first...
>
> > At the moment, I'm having a discussion on IRC
;ve
missed some part of this conversation, but would be available to help
with the conversion phase.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kenya.rcbowen.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > Do we have an example something.xml file to work from? I feel that I've
> > missed some part of this conversation, but would be available to help
> > with the conversion phase.
>
> Indeed, Astrid created such a thing. See:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgrou
I've noticed that the Auth tutorial in the 2.0 docs is way out of sync
with that in the 1.3 docs - missing a lot of content - and I can't
recall how this happened. Anyone remember if this was done intentionally
for some reason?
If not, I'm going to try to get them back in sync, as the 1.3 doc is
a
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I've noticed that the Auth tutorial in the 2.0 docs is way out of sync
> with that in the 1.3 docs - missing a lot of content - and I can't
> recall how this happened. Anyone remember if this was done intentionally
> for some reason?
I have thrown together a htaccess tutorial, which can be seen at
http://www.apacheadmin.com/htaccess.txt
Please let me know what you think. I'm about to put it in HTML or XML or
whatever we are doing now, and would appreciate feedback at this stage.
Thanks.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROT
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, [ISO-8859-1] André Malo wrote:
> * Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I have thrown together a htaccess tutorial, which can be seen at
> > http://www.apacheadmin.com/htaccess.txt
>
> nice.
>
> my EUR 0.02:
>
> * SSI + CGI Examples
>
> | Note th
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
>
> > http://www.apacheadmin.com/htaccess.txt
> > Please let me know what you think.
>
> I like the style of the document very much.
>
> My first FAQ-like question to the document would be:
> - How can I find out which AllowOverride setti
I just discovered, doing some last minute prep for my talk this
afternoon, that mod_echo has no docs. Fun, huh? So I will hopefully be
doing something about that later this week. Just letting you know.
--
Rich Bowen
Apache - mod_perl - Perl - CGI
http://www.ApacheAdmin.com
On 24 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rbowen 2002/07/23 20:13:04
>
> Modified:docs/manual/mod allmodules.html.en allmodules.xml
> Added: docs/manual/mod mod_echo.html.en mod_echo.xml
This still does not show up in directives.html and modules.html. What do
I still need to ch
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Acked.
Fixed.
--
And everyone said, "If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve -
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!"
(The Jumblies, by Edward Lear)
-
To unsubscribe
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > This still does not show up in directives.html and modules.html. What do
> > I still need to change to make that happen?
>
> I think that is because we haven't setup proper "dep
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > > This still does not show up in directives.html and modules.html. What do
> > > I still need to change to make that happen?
>
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> > First draft of .htaccess tutorial-style documentation
>
> ... Many good suggestions here ...
Thanks. All suggestions applied.
> All of the modifications mentioned above and a little different
>
> HTML coding (putting ... around file
>
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, David Shane Holden wrote:
> I've created a patch that gets all the .html and .html.en files in the
> manual directory and subdirecties (except mod/... that'll come next) to
> successfully validate against the xhtml transitionial dtd.
>
> http://dpejesh.dnsalias.net/patch.txt
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > All of the modifications mentioned above and a little different
> >
> > HTML coding (putting ... around file
> >
> > and path names, and ... around
> >
> > directives outside example sections), and using two
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, David Shane Holden wrote:
>
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, David Shane Holden wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I've created a patch that gets all the .html and .html.en files in the
> >>manual directory and subdirecties (except
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > From the looks of it, that's only relevant to the mod directory which is
> > why I haven't touched it yet. If I'm wrong, where's the xml files for all
> > the others?
>
> Oh, I'm sorry, I complete
there were a number of changes, I think. I tried to
keep a particular kind of change per diff, but there have been a number
of diffs, and now I'm confused.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefknot.org
---
; Hi,
>
> I attach a patch that covers SSLProxy* directives that exist in mod_ssl for
> Apache 2 but that are not documented anywhere.
> It would be nice to add some more docs to ProxyPass, etc. to indicate that
> you can do
> ProxyPasss / https://secure.host.com/
> but I do not
a working full example
I'm a little confused by this comment. If there is stuff that you want
to add to the document, it would be nice to add it in the English
version also. What kind of a "working full example" is it that you want
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Irmund Thum wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Irmund Thum wrote:
> >
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>(who would volunteer to translate this article to German)
> >>>
> >&g
I'll be offline all next week (not yet sure if this is a blessing or a
curse) and I hope to be doing a bit of docs stuff during that time. I
was planning to do a bunch of the docs conversion. However, as I will be
completely out of touch, and nobody will know what I'm working on, I was
wondering wh
inks (perhaps howtos/index.html) ?
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefknot.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dditionally useful to have a list of people that are not necessarily
translators, but who are willing to review translations for correctness.
I don't think that this stuff belongs in the STATUS doc, which would get
very cluttered, but perhaps we can start a new file with this
information?
--
R
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Werner Schalk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the docs about input and output
> filters can be found at
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/filter.html
> but the link to SetInputFilter
> and SetOutputFilter is not
> correct. It links to
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/core.html.html
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ---
> Scenario 1: Server wants to control which clients access some
> protected files.
> Topics: Authentication (of all kind), Directory Browsing,
> ScriptAlias, .ht
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Thomas [iso-8859-1] Sjögren wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 August 2002 10:48, Michael wrote:
>
> > Fine. But I think it wouldn't hurt to at least mention the
> > scenario in the "security document" starting section and
> > link to the tutorial named above - as there may be readers
>
efault config are somehow canonical and inviolate. I don't know
how to combat that one just yet, particularly with some delightful linux
distros shipping Apache config files with a comment that they should
only be modified by a guru.
Anyways, yes, I think that this doc is an improvement, and very good
e in question, surely we would already
have a translation into that language. The goal is to get translations
into languages that we don't already have, which, necessarily, means
that we'll also have to have an outside source of verification.
--
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Ilia Soldis wrote:
> I've involved one more person into the translation work. So now all aspects
> of the translation are checked. May be I'll link up some other people to this
> work, but actually I see no need of this. If you disagree, please, inform me.
> Previous files w
? I've not seen much evidence of that.
It would be a shame if a willing participant was turned away by thinking
that someone else was already doing a translation, so there was no need
of their help.
Better just to have a pointer here to the doc on the docs-project site.
--
Rich Bowen
TED]:~/devel/apache/httpd-docs-2.0% ls -alR | grep '.xml' |
grep -cv '.xml.ja'
90
Of course, that's not right, since there are .xml files that are not
english and not japanese, but not many. And for some reason, egrep is
not doing end-of-line matching the
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Luiz Rocha wrote:
>
> > >But let's keep it around until the xml conversion is finished and we
> > > can update the release process accordingly.
> >
> > How many files need to be converted to
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Luiz Rocha wrote:
> > Just choose a couple files and post to the list what you are working
> > on so that we don't have the same file converted twice. (I don't
> > usually do this myself, but that's just because I always commit my work
> > within an hour of starting it, so t
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> >
> > So that leaves 67 files that still need converted. In English, at least.
> >
>
> Hey, are you trying to wreck my good mood? ;-)
>
> To be honest, I can't figure out where all those
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Luiz Rocha wrote:
> Man, this is a mess! And they say Internet is an easy way to comunicate :)
No, that's IRC! ;-)
> Rich, keep the howto/. I'll do the vhosts/, no problem. Actually, I find
> much easier to stick to a topic while translating.
OK. I'll probably get to th
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Running the following code:
>
> ---
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> use File::Find;
> find({ wanted => \&count, follow => 1 }, '.');
>
> sub count {
> $x = $File::Find::fullname;
>
>
and if
> anybody would actually use it or not.
What is a .chm file? This looks like so much line noise to me, so I
assume I'm missing something.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/
>
> Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice.
This looks really great, people.
Nit: On the files in howto/ the top left "Back" link takes one to a
directory listing.
is deserves an announcement as well as a front-page
> httpd.apache.org piece.
Probably jumped the gun a little, but I posted something on /. as folks
have probably already noticed.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New
York
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:05:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/
> > >
> > > Congrats to everyone who wo
In the mod_userdir docs, we have the following example:
UserDir enabled
UserDir disabled foo bar baz
This causes a syntax error on restart:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/rbowen# apachectl configtest
Syntax error on line 318 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
UserDir "enable" keyword requires a list
slated to XML.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kenya.rcbowen.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
attempt
to make it a little better. So if anyone is planning to translate this,
you might want to hold off for a few days.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kenya.rcbowen.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Word to the wise.
"tidy -mi -xml" is NOT recommended for tidy'ing up XML. It inserted
random line breaks all over the place, and a bunch of s everywhere
for no apparent reason.
--
Rich Bowen
Apache - mod_perl - Perl - CGI
http://www.
ur page at http://www.sexyblones.com/manual/howto/ssi.html and
noticed that you're not listed in the search engines.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As we trace our own few circles around the sun
We get it backwards and our seven years go by like one
Dog Years (Rush -
I have been doing Apache training this week for some folks that are very
concerned about security. We spent about half of Friday doing two
things. First, we attempted to figure out what the absolute minimum set
of modules was that Apache could run with. Second, we tried to figure
out what the minim
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'm going to write up some of our observations over the next few days as
> I have time, and was hoping to stir up a little interest so that when I
> have something, some folks will be willing to take a look at it.
OK, please forgive the for
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I'm going to write up some of our observations over the next few days as
> > I have time, and was hoping to stir up a little interest so that when I
> > have something, some folks w
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > > * So, here's the recommendation:
> > >
> > > chown root.www logs
> > > chmod 770 logs
> >
> > This goes explicitly against what is documented in the current docs
> > and allow anyone
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Marc Slemko wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> >
> > =Apache security
>
> Two comments:
>
> 1. a lot of silly and futile restrictions here that don't do anything
> to improve security and only serve to make people do
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > OK, I'm confused. What here would you have to do as root that should not
> > be that way?
>
> I'm not anything near a security expert, but ...
>
> Your permissions keep ordinary users
1 - 100 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
