https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64894
--- Comment #1 from Christophe JAILLET ---
Hi,
where do you see this '>=0' in the doc?
Is this an interpretation of the default value? (i.e. 0 (disabled))
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
--- Comment #1 from Christophe JAILLET ---
I think that nowadays, the limit is much higher and there is no check in the
code to test the limit given in the doc.
I think that it comes from old ages as 32767 is the maximum value for an int on
a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64894
zsl changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
--- Comment #2 from zsl ---
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1)
> I think that nowadays, the limit is much higher and there is no check in the
> code to test the limit given in the doc.
>
> I think that it comes from old ages as 3
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64894
--- Comment #2 from zsl ---
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1)
> Hi,
>
> where do you see this '>=0' in the doc?
> Is this an interpretation of the default value? (i.e. 0 (disabled))
Sorry, that might be a misunderstanding about
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64897
--- Comment #2 from zsl ---
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1)
> Hi, same as bug 64887.
>
> in fact, it is documented.
> The context of this directive is "server config".
>
> See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/directive
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64887
--- Comment #2 from zsl ---
(In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1)
> Hi,
>
> in fact, it is documented.
> The context of this directive is "server config".
>
> See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/directive-dict.html#Context
