https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #15 from Rich Bowen ---
Yes, I think I'd like to do that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53530
--- Comment #5 from Rich Bowen ---
r1673804 adds a brief note about when you may/must use quotes in directory
paths. It would be worth having a "conventions" document that discusses stuff
like this that spans multiple directives, so that we don
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57817
Bug ID: 57817
Summary: contributors list out of date
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57077
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57817
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985
--- Comment #1 from Rich Bowen ---
Looks like it's
SuppressLastModified
SuppressSize
SuppressDescription
SuppressRules
XHTML
IconsAreLinks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
Hi,
Hmm. Putting the extra sections to the bottom does not seem very wise to me
(if I understand that diff properly).
I think, changing the TOC instead would be better - if at all.
(dunno what was discussed off-list about that)
Cheers,
nd
* drugg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: druggeri
> Date
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153
--- Comment #2 from Filipus Klutiero ---
Thank you Rich.
Just to be clear, I have changed job since I filed this and haven't had to use
mod_rewrite in 3 years, so I'm even less clear on what the documentation should
read. On the other hand, I s
Yes. After some additional chatting, we landed on the same idea you are
suggesting. Should be good now. The TOC and page contents show the extra topics
and then the directives list.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
Original Message
From: "André Malo"
Sent: April 15, 2015 12:20:22 PM CDT
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55990
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55990
Mike Rumph changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SetEnv vs. =! |SetEnv vs. =! inconsistency
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57819
Bug ID: 57819
Summary: Need a conventions document
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #1 from Rich Bowen ---
Fixed the FilesMatch so that it no longer matches the file '.cgi' in r1673954
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from Rich Bowen
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57819
--- Comment #1 from Rodent of Unusual Size ---
Oh, and come up with (and use) some consistent argument-type keywords, like
* FILE-PATH (and describe in the user conventions that these are ServerRoot-
relative if not absolute)
* KEYWORD (like
I wonder if some of you might express an opinion here. I think that the
use of the word 'extension' is standard and consistent. What do you think?
On 04/15/2015 04:02 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
Rich Bowen changed:
What|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #3 from Tim B ---
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_mime.html#multipleext seems clear to
me.
The httpd documentation is aimed at technically minded people rather than end
users of websites.
In >6 years of commercial technic
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #4 from Rodent of Unusual Size ---
An alternative also widely in use is "suffix". Does Guillaume d'Occam like
that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #5 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #2)
> whatever.tar.gz files, for example, have been around forever, and tar and gz
> are talked about as the two file extensions.
One could also say that "(.)tar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #6 from sebast...@pipping.org ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #1)
> Fixed the FilesMatch so that it no longer matches the file '.cgi' in r1673954
Is that change meant to be about hidden file in general? I would expect
some
24 matches
Mail list logo
