On Jun 15, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/13/07, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
browser. While we'd obviously not be flying that high, would the
ASF be
entitled to any such revenue from our own search box, or the
individual
who happens to own the account?
FWIW,
On 6/13/07, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
browser. While we'd obviously not be flying that high, would the ASF be
entitled to any such revenue from our own search box, or the individual
who happens to own the account?
FWIW, we don't want to be involved with any such ad-sharing from
G
On 6/14/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, once it has come through I'll pester you so we can get started.
Have we reached the decision that we should be using solr, over Google?
Yes. If we have people interested in putting the time in to give it a
go (that would be you and Sand
> If you want to take that on Tony, I'm fine with that too. But you need
> to realize that a lot of the work is going to be figuring out how to
> get this to interact well with apache infrastructure. (What server
> should it run on? Does it need a custom account for the necessary cron
> jobs? Ho
On 6/13/07, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
> If you want to take that on Tony, I'm fine with that too. But you need
> to realize that a lot of the work is going to be figuring out how to
> get this to interact well with apache infrastruc
On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
If you want to take that on Tony, I'm fine with that too. But you need
to realize that a lot of the work is going to be figuring out how to
get this to interact well with apache infrastructure. (What server
should it run on? Does it need a custom
On 6/13/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tell you what, once a decision has been made I would be very happy to
take this on as my first task. (Above and beyond patching, of course).
Is there a case for trialling so called 'rival' products in a bid to
ascertain their suitability for
...
Joshua Slive wrote:
I have no problem at all with that, providing someone is willing to
take charge, drive it through to completion, and assure it is
maintained for some period of time. My primary concern is with giving
our users the best possible search. Our experience with running our
ow
On 6/13/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With our current search box, all the revenue is going to google.
I take that back. Google isn't currently running adds on our searches
it appears. But I believe they have the right to do so.
Anyway, with CSE they explicitly allow non-profits
On 6/13/07, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wonder, also, whether it would be possible to run solr, since it's
> actually an Apache project. However, having never had any success
> getting it working on my own servers, that might be a can of worms.
Firmly +1 on dog
On 13/06/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What if we created a google account for the docs project and stored
its userid and password in the private pmc svn and used that to create
the search engine? Does this violate google's terms of service?
Opinions?
Given the long history of 1.3
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:33:23PM -0400, Sander Temme wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > I wonder, also, whether it would be possible to run solr, since it's
> > actually an Apache project. However, having never had any success
> > getting it working on my own servers, that might be a can of worms.
Rich Bowen wrote:
> I wonder, also, whether it would be possible to run solr, since it's
> actually an Apache project. However, having never had any success
> getting it working on my own servers, that might be a can of worms.
Firmly +1 on dogfooding. If *we* can't get Solr to work, who can? I
Joshua Slive wrote:
It would be nice to replace the current hacked-up google search of our
docs with a proper "custom search engine" from google. The problem is
that custom search engines are tied to specific google accounts, and I
don't think it is a good idea for any single person to have con
It would be nice to replace the current hacked-up google search of our
docs with a proper "custom search engine" from google. The problem is
that custom search engines are tied to specific google accounts, and I
don't think it is a good idea for any single person to have control
over the config.
On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:52, Joshua Slive wrote:
It would be nice to replace the current hacked-up google search of our
docs with a proper "custom search engine" from google. The problem is
that custom search engines are tied to specific google accounts, and I
don't think it is a good idea for an
It would be nice to replace the current hacked-up google search of our
docs with a proper "custom search engine" from google. The problem is
that custom search engines are tied to specific google accounts, and I
don't think it is a good idea for any single person to have control
over the config.
17 matches
Mail list logo
