On Apr 25, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
The way I should have phrased it is this: When people who aren't
working on a particular documentation issue try to control how it is
done, it takes the fun out of it for me.
You lost me there. If you define a documentation task as a one-person
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not going to put this to a PMC vote because I think it is
> poisoness to the docs group to let a bunch of people who aren't
> participating in documentation development make decisions on
> inconsequential docs chang
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Petazzoni <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy's idea here is good. Let's setup a design contest, with rules we
> will agree on (keeping the logo, accessibiliy, being xhtml1.1 compliant
> or whatever), and vote on the results. Sum up the vote, and commit the
>
[Ok, let's jump into the ring.]
Hi,
* Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 15:51:29]:
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>> We are all very busy people, and this kind of bike shedding doesn't
>> get us anywhere.
>
> We have a defined process for resolving paint colors
Finally someone injects the much needed sanity in this thread!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:22 AM, dhickox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hy Frankdavid,but call me dhickox,firstI would like some body to detail me
> what role am I playing on theseginy pig experimental,I feel you in on
> part,I been tr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: adopt www.apache.org site design
> On Thursday 24 April 2008 22:31:56 Paul Querna wrote:
> > Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > >> Which just goes to show why I stated in my original email that I
>
On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
We are all very busy people, and this kind of bike shedding doesn't
get us anywhere.
We have a defined process for resolving paint colors for bike sheds.
We only use it when there is disagreement. The only time this stuff
blows up is when people
On Thursday 24 April 2008 22:31:56 Paul Querna wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >> Which just goes to show why I stated in my original email that I
> >> wasn't interested in nitpicking the design with a bunch of back-seat
> >> quarterbacks. Everyone has different opinions about what constitutes
>
On Thursday 24 April 2008 20:29:20 Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In any case, I've got way better things to
> > do then this.
>
> Whatever, Roy.
>
> I'm not going to put this to a PMC vote because I think it is
> poisoness t
Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
The detail lost in this discussion is that docs@ is a specific activity
of the httpd project, documenting the httpd application, in a dozen
languages, with
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Which just goes to show why I stated in my original email that I
wasn't interested in nitpicking the design with a bunch of back-seat
quarterbacks. Everyone has different opinions about what constitutes
good design. I was trying to adopt something that had a pretty-obvious
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case, I've got way better things to
> do then this.
Whatever, Roy.
I'm not going to put this to a PMC vote because I think it is
poisoness to the docs group to let a bunch of people who aren't
participating in
On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
The pages you pointed to as examples used <100% for their default text
fonts (at least the ones I checked). If you're trying to make an
empirical argument, start by checking the data.
I looked at the characters on screen. I don't care if the cha
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > What are you talking about Roy? I don't want to get into this
> > argument, but just checking one of the those three example sites (the
> > last one), I found all th
Jason Lingohr wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
I'm iffy on it at this moment -- I have a long weekend coming up
(thankyou for all your efforts diggers!), and I'll look over it
Joshua Slive a écrit :
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
Perhaps a little dated, but so clear and efficient, . . . , looked good
to me :'(
But don't let us cry and pouring tears, let's go ahead :-)
I'm n
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:25:18AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:59:54 -0400
> "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Two small changes to the CSS got rid of the
> > font-size and reflow issue, as you can see from
> > http://people.apache.org/~slive/httpd-site/docs/
>
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:15:48 -0500
"Webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main thing that makes it look basd is the clashing boldness of the
> purple and red fonts against a light black font that doesn't look so
> good against all that tan.
>
> Just little tweaks and it will look awesome, b
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:59:54 -0400
"Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two small changes to the CSS got rid of the
> font-size and reflow issue, as you can see from
> http://people.apache.org/~slive/httpd-site/docs/
Yes, that addresses my most important criticisms.
I can withdraw -1, but
Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
Go for it, a +1 from me too. Nice move, I was wondering how long it
would take to disseminate into project websites.
I'm not interested in getting into
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The background
> is white because that's the background of our nontransparent logo
> images, and unless you intend to convert them all there is no
> point in trying to change it. If you want to improve other things
> about our site, then go ahea
On Apr 23, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
What are you talking about Roy? I don't want to get into this
argument, but just checking one of the those three example sites (the
last one), I found all three of the "flaws" that Nick was after: does
not reflow properly for very-small screens, se
23, 2008 3:04 PM
> To: docs@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: adopt www.apache.org site design
>
> Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site
> design? The httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
>
> I'm not interested in getting into a long debate abo
Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
I'm iffy on it at this moment -- I have a long weekend coming up
(thankyou for all your efforts diggers!), and I'll look over it a bit
more then.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
> httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
+1 to switching.
Those who are complaining know where the source is and they can
improve upon it th
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > I know all these arguments, and I'm not going to get into them, except
> > to say that the vast majority of websites on the internet share every
> > one of these "fla
On Apr 23, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
I know all these arguments, and I'm not going to get into them, except
to say that the vast majority of websites on the internet share every
one of these "flaws". Two small changes to the CSS got rid of the
font-size and reflow issue, as you can se
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:04:09 -0400
> "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Here is a rough cut
> > http://people.apache.org/~slive/httpd-site/docs/
> > The links don't work, but you can type in the URLs with the
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:04:09 -0400
"Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a rough cut
> http://people.apache.org/~slive/httpd-site/docs/
> The links don't work, but you can type in the URLs with the obvious
> adjustment to see other pages.
-1 as-is. Wearing my (admittedly old) web
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>
> > Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
> > httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
> >
>
> I don't think so. Maybe I am g
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:39:11PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I don't think so. Maybe I am going blind, but I find that style very
> hard to read. I prefer the larger font, white background, and original
> feather graphics of our current site. I seriously dislike the menu bar
> and horizont
On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
I don't think so. Maybe I am going blind, but I find that style very
hard to read. I prefer the larger font, white backgrou
On 04/23/2008 10:04 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
Thanks for picking this up. Do it. Details can be adjusted later.
I'm not interested in getting into a long debate about the d
On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
+1, Do it.
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE
Any objections to adopting the new www.apache.org site design? The
httpd site is looking a little dated, in my opinion.
I'm not interested in getting into a long debate about the details of
the design. (Although people are welcome to play around after it is
committed.) I just grabbed exactly what
35 matches
Mail list logo
