Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-06-08 Thread Rich Bowen
Long, long ago, Tony Stevenson wrote: Ok, here is just a small example of what I have done so far. I have attached a patch for rewrite/rewrite_intro.xml Hopefully this will show what I am trying to do. Note that everything in the rewrite/ subdir was an experiment, back when I thought

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-31 Thread Tony Stevenson
On Thu, May 31, 2007 2:30 pm, Joshua Slive wrote: > On 5/31/07, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:29:34AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: >> >>> Could this all be done in the official docs? Sure. Will it get done >>> there? I doubt it. This type of documentation (exa

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-31 Thread Vincent Bray
On 31/05/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not a big fan of wikis either. But if you are going to look at evidence, look at the quantity and quality of docs added to the wiki in the last six months versus the work in the main docs. Thanks ;-) I'm not about to go deleting anythin

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-31 Thread Mads Toftum
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:30:23AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > I'm not about to go deleting anything in the main docs. But if the > material on the wiki becomes a superior superset of the rewriteguide, > and nobody volunteers to push the material back to the main docs, I > will be fully in favor o

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-31 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/31/07, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:29:34AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > Could this all be done in the official docs? Sure. Will it get done > there? I doubt it. This type of documentation (example configs solving > particular problems) is exactly the pla

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-31 Thread Mads Toftum
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:29:34AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > Could this all be done in the official docs? Sure. Will it get done > there? I doubt it. This type of documentation (example configs solving > particular problems) is exactly the place where the wiki excels. > > So, Mads, can you expl

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-30 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/30/07, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:31:49PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > By the way, I assume you are talking about the reference docs. The > "practical solutions" docs should be transferred to the wiki along > with Rich's stuff, in my opinion. > Leaning

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-30 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 05:31:49PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > By the way, I assume you are talking about the reference docs. The > "practical solutions" docs should be transferred to the wiki along > with Rich's stuff, in my opinion. > Leaning very hard towards -1 - we've got something very usef

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-29 Thread Kundai A. Midzi
Joshua Slive wrote: > By the way, I assume you are talking about the reference docs. The > "practical solutions" docs should be transferred to the wiki along > with Rich's stuff, in my opinion. I agree. The wiki seems a better location. --Kundai --

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-29 Thread Tony Stevenson
e. I have been plugging away on the rewrite docs, the ones that no one wants to touch. I have noticed a common theme throughout the exisiting documents that relate mod_rewrite to voodoo/magic. In my hacked-up/new versions I have removed all references to this. I just feel it outsthe frighten

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-29 Thread Joshua Slive
g away on the rewrite docs, the ones that no one wants to touch. I have noticed a common theme throughout the exisiting documents that relate mod_rewrite to voodoo/magic. In my hacked-up/new versions I have removed all references to this. I just feel it outsthe frighteners on people, before they

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-29 Thread Tony Stevenson
Tony Stevenson wrote: Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:24:31PM +0100, Tony Stevenson wrote: Ok, After my last few patches lacked the necessary gusto to be comitted (due to my less than perfect English), I have been plugging away on the rewrite docs, the ones that no one

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-29 Thread Tony Stevenson
Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:24:31PM +0100, Tony Stevenson wrote: Ok, After my last few patches lacked the necessary gusto to be comitted (due to my less than perfect English), I have been plugging away on the rewrite docs, the ones that no one wants to touch. I have

Re: Rewrite Docs

2007-05-29 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:24:31PM +0100, Tony Stevenson wrote: > Ok, > > After my last few patches lacked the necessary gusto to be comitted (due > to my less than perfect English), I have been plugging away on the > rewrite docs, the ones that no one wants to touch. I

Rewrite Docs

2007-05-29 Thread Tony Stevenson
Ok, After my last few patches lacked the necessary gusto to be comitted (due to my less than perfect English), I have been plugging away on the rewrite docs, the ones that no one wants to touch. I have noticed a common theme throughout the exisiting documents that relate mod_rewrite to