Re: FAQ in the docs-proyect

2016-04-26 Thread Luis Gil
Great, then if i got time i will take a closer look to the wiki FAQ so we can bring it *here* ;) El 26/4/2016 15:36, "Rich Bowen" escribió: > > > On 04/25/2016 09:33 PM, Luis Gil wrote: > > Actually i was thinking about some filtering, or maybe add some if > > needed, but OFC i will not do work t

Re: FAQ in the docs-proyect

2016-04-26 Thread Rich Bowen
On 04/25/2016 09:33 PM, Luis Gil wrote: > Actually i was thinking about some filtering, or maybe add some if > needed, but OFC i will not do work that it will be in vain... It's not in vain. We removed the FAQ because it was garbage, not because we don't want an FAQ. Also, the wiki was initiall

Re: FAQ in the docs-proyect

2016-04-25 Thread Luis Gil
Actually i was thinking about some filtering, or maybe add some if needed, but OFC i will not do work that it will be in vain... On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 at 13:47 Rich Bowen wrote: > History: we dropped the FAQ page because it was so grossly out of date > that it wasn't readily salvageable. I don't

Re: FAQ in the docs-proyect

2016-04-25 Thread Rich Bowen
History: we dropped the FAQ page because it was so grossly out of date that it wasn't readily salvageable. I don't object to Frequently Asked Questions pages if they are indeed frequently asked questions. What we had were not, and many of the answers were bad. I haven't looked at the one in the Wi