On 11/10/06, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/10/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/10/06, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/install.html
> >
> > Is "Apache HTTPd" an old name now? It's used in multiple places in
> >
Forgot to point out that this is a patch to the 2.2 branch install.xml
file. In trunk the section on apr has gone on to better places it
seems. Also, I didn't add the needing to be root note yet.
--
noodl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On 11/10/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/10/06, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/install.html
>
> Is "Apache HTTPd" an old name now? It's used in multiple places in
> this document in contrast to "Apache HTTP Server".
We've never
On 11/10/06, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/install.html
Is "Apache HTTPd" an old name now? It's used in multiple places in
this document in contrast to "Apache HTTP Server".
We've never really settled on how we refer to it in the docs. I find
"Ap
