* Vincent Bray wrote:
> On 24/07/07, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is, if you're doing it explicitly. Most people use [L] though, so it
> > doesn't matter very much. IIRC, if done implicitly, the [P] flag
> > finishs the set, the [R] flag doesn't. But I need to check against the
> >
On 7/23/07, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Compatibility: The cookie-flag is available in Apache 2.0.40 and later
.. seems fairly irrelevant, given [H] and whatever other new tricks
RewriteRule has learned since then.
You've opened the barrel-of-worms we call mod_rewrite and you ex
On 23/07/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
URL-path is the syntax I've tried to use elsewhere in the docs to
represent exactly this thing. See:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/directive-dict.html#Syntax
URI Reference is no more correct than URL in my opinion.
So I'd just replace
On 24/07/07, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is, if you're doing it explicitly. Most people use [L] though, so it
doesn't matter very much. IIRC, if done implicitly, the [P] flag finishs
the set, the [R] flag doesn't. But I need to check against the sources as
well :-)
RewriteEngine On
On 7/23/07, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not that easy. I think, explaining the start (URL-path, absolute in server
context but relative to the .htaccess in directory context) and mentioning
the "current" part for further matches should do.
I don't think you want to get too complicate
* Vincent Bray wrote:
> On 23/07/07, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well.. it's not entirely true. It actually matches both. In
> > contrast to popular belief the particular word to mind here is
> > "current". Within a given set, mod_rewrite matches the current value of
> > r->uri
On 23/07/07, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well.. it's not entirely true. It actually matches both. In contrast to
popular belief the particular word to mind here is "current". Within a
given set, mod_rewrite matches the current value of r->uri or r->filename,
I think (depending on se
* André Malo wrote:
> * Vincent Bray wrote:
> > While I'm on a bit of a roll, I'll mention that subject that strikes
> > fear in to the hearts of intrepid geeks, mod_rewrite and its docs.
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42898
> >
> > The url in the PR is for 1.3 but tru
On 7/23/07, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I'm on a bit of a roll, I'll mention that subject that strikes
fear in to the hearts of intrepid geeks, mod_rewrite and its docs.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42898
The url in the PR is for 1.3 but trunk has the same
* Vincent Bray wrote:
> While I'm on a bit of a roll, I'll mention that subject that strikes
> fear in to the hearts of intrepid geeks, mod_rewrite and its docs.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42898
>
> The url in the PR is for 1.3 but trunk has the same issue.
>
> What's t
While I'm on a bit of a roll, I'll mention that subject that strikes
fear in to the hearts of intrepid geeks, mod_rewrite and its docs.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42898
The url in the PR is for 1.3 but trunk has the same issue.
What's the correct term for the bit of the r
11 matches
Mail list logo
