Re: FancyIndexing not valid HTML

2006-11-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/8/06, Lars Eilebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: According to Chris: > Is it a known and accepted fact that FancyIndexing generates > invalid HTML? FancyIndexing puts invalid tags inside the block. > I'm inclined to report it, but perhaps it's accepted for improved > appearance. If

Re: FancyIndexing not valid HTML

2006-11-08 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
According to Chris: > Is it a known and accepted fact that FancyIndexing generates > invalid HTML? FancyIndexing puts invalid tags inside the block. > I'm inclined to report it, but perhaps it's accepted for improved > appearance. If that's so, FancyIndexing shouldn't be on by default >

FancyIndexing not valid HTML

2006-11-07 Thread Chris Pepper
Is it a known and accepted fact that FancyIndexing generates invalid HTML? FancyIndexing puts invalid tags inside the block. I'm inclined to report it, but perhaps it's accepted for improved appearance. If that's so, FancyIndexing shouldn't be on by default (it is in Mac OS X 10.4 Server and