Re: Clarification on NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost sections

On 9/22/07, Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > > > If a block does not contain a ServerName statement the > > > hostname > > > of the computer will be used. > > > > Not quite. It should be "Each block should contain a > > ServerName. If it is absent, the Ser

Re: Clarification on NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost sections

Joshua Slive wrote: > > If a block does not contain a ServerName statement the > > hostname > > of the computer will be used. > > Not quite. It should be "Each block should contain a > ServerName. If it is absent, the ServerName from the main server > configuration will be used." Unless t

Re: Clarification on NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost sections

On 9/22/07, Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd supply a patch, but I don't know which of: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#virtualhost > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/ ... > is appropriate. >

Clarification on NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost sections

Hi, I'd supply a patch, but I don't know which of: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#virtualhost http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/name-based.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/ ... is appropriate. I believe the statement: If a block does not contain a ServerName