https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Rich Bowen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #11 from Rich Bowen ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #10)
> > I can't find this anywhere, in any branch. What version/branch/whatever are
> > you running this scan against?
>
> Looks like you zapped it in April already.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #10 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #9)
> (In reply to zailmz from comment #7)
> > Comment on attachment 33757 [details]
> > List of broken links
>
> > >Invalid link http://fastcgi.coremail.cn
>
>
> I c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #9 from Rich Bowen ---
(In reply to zailmz from comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 33757 [details]
> List of broken links
> >Invalid link http://fastcgi.coremail.cn
I can't find this anywhere, in any branch. What version/branch/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #8 from Rich Bowen ---
It would be valuable to separate these into those in the original source xml
document, and those in translations. As far as I can tell, I've fixed all of
the ones in the English versions of the doc. When I hav
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #7 from zailmz ---
Comment on attachment 33757
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33757
List of broken links
>Invalid link http://java.apache.org/
> in http://localhost/manual/ru/platform/ebcdic.html
> in http
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #6 from Rich Bowen ---
This is far from done, but I've taken a bite out of it. Thank you so much for
this report. I know this is a lot to ask, but can you possibly run it again,
and provide versions of the report run against:
http:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #5 from Martin Frodl ---
I tried building httpd from trunk (on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.2) but I ran
into troubles with buildconf being unable to see my system's APR packages.
That's why I downloaded the latest packaged version (2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #4 from Rich Bowen ---
So, I see that you mention 2.5-HEAD in your bug report, but a lot of these
things I'm not seeing in trunk at all, or I'm only seeing in translation. This
raises the larger question of how long we should hang o
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #3 from Rich Bowen ---
ssl_intro has been completely rewritten in trunk. It looks like the broken
references only still exist in the Japanese translation.
Perhaps someone can backport the rewrite back into 2.2 and burn the
translat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #2 from Rich Bowen ---
platform/ebcdic.html no longer exists in trunk. Reference removed in 2.4 in
1739070.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #1 from Martin Frodl ---
Created attachment 33757
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33757&action=edit
List of broken links
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
