Re: misplaced directive

Le 22/07/2023 à 15:36, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Hello, 2.4.x branch DeflateAlterETag directive misplaced in file mod_deflate.xml Lucien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-

Re: Removing comments section

alive again, I'm still around and still volunteer. CJ --Rich On 2022/01/24 20:16:30 Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 24/01/2022 à 18:54, Rich Bowen a écrit : It is my intent to drop the comments section from the bottom of each page of the httpd documentation, since it has been broken for Y

Re: apreq documentation

Le 04/09/2022 à 08:18, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : I've commited the change yesterday on https://github.com/apache/httpd-site, but the site has not been updated (mail to the csv mailing list about the commit neither) I've contacted infra this morning about it. If s.o. has an id

Re: apreq documentation

Le 28/08/2022 à 15:48, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, with the recent release of apreq 2.17, the documentation ([1]) looked a bit out dated. The main page speaks about 2.13! It was last generated with Doxygen 1.5.6 nearly 12 years ago. The link to the documentation can be found at ([2

apreq documentation

Hi, with the recent release of apreq 2.17, the documentation ([1]) looked a bit out dated. The main page speaks about 2.13! It was last generated with Doxygen 1.5.6 nearly 12 years ago. The link to the documentation can be found at ([2]). Tweaking things a bit (see my recent commits), and u

Re: Removing comments section

Le 24/01/2022 à 18:54, Rich Bowen a écrit : It is my intent to drop the comments section from the bottom of each page of the httpd documentation, since it has been broken for YEARS, and is simply confusing when people see it there, but it doesn't work. If you object to this, or wish to go fix

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

Le 30/09/2018 à 17:52, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Le 29/09/2018 à 15:42, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Le 29/09/2018 à 09:03, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation

Re: "too high"

Le 11/06/2020 à 12:25, David Poole a écrit : Hi all, This is my first patch, so hopefully it is correct. Seems to be there for 2.2/2.4/trunk Not sure of the French/Japanese, the French seems the same. Thank you. - To unsub

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

Le 20/02/2020 à 23:23, André Malo a écrit : Rich Bowen wrote: On 1/9/20 2:14 AM, André Malo wrote: If you'd ask me, I'd rather kill XML/XSLT entirely, as the promises both for Java and XML/XSLT clearly don't hold anymore. However this also requires time and effort... Revisiting a thread that s

Re: Building docs for trunk and 2.4.x without changing char encoding

You see some differences on trunk only because Mike R has committed files generated with Java 11 on trunk. I guess that the last one who committed generated files on 2.4 was using an Java 8 or older version. CJ Le 08/02/2020 à 18:28, Luca Toscano a écrit : Wasn't able to repro in 2.4.x (docs

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

wrote: Il giorno mar 2 ott 2018 alle ore 15:55 Rainer Jung ha scritto: Am 29.09.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: Do we need to change something? == [ ] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something that works [ ] no. I can leave with th

Improve links between directives in documentation

Hi, I've updated common.xsl in order to warn when xml files could be slightly improved. (see r1869016) It checks (and removes) some unneeded links to some directives and warns about missing ones. Feedback welcome. My goal is to try to completely remove the need of @module in and have th

Removal of the Jakarta-oro regex parser

Hi httpd documentation list, for your information (and testing), I've removed the Jakarta-oro regex parser from our doc build framework in r1853689 and 1853690. As stated in r1853689 changelog, it was out-dated and useless nowadays. Please report any issue you may notice with the defaulted Ja

Comment system on online doc

Hi, the online doc used to have a comment system where users could add some additional information, clarification and/or propose improvement/correction of the doc. However, the underlying system has been down for about 10 months now. https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62227 (Jira

Re: trailing whitespaces removed by r1673947 only in trunk

Le 21/10/2018 à 10:52, Luca Toscano a écrit : Hi everybody, while trying to merge r1844401 in 2.4.x I noticed some conflicts, that as far as I can tell are coming from r1673947. It seems a big and old change that was never backported, but it mixes xml and transformations (that it is not ideal).

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

Le 29/09/2018 à 15:27, Eric Covener a écrit : As per Xalan documentation, the JDK or JRE 1.3.x (2000), 1.4.x (2002), or 5.x (2004) is required. As per our doc build documentation, we need at least Java 1.2 (1998) to build the doc. Java 8 (2014) is LTS and is supported until 2025 Java 9 (2017) Jav

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

Le 29/09/2018 à 09:03, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation. By not correct, I mean:    - ISO-8859-1 non ASCII characters are replaced again by their HTML

[VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation. By not correct, I mean:    - ISO-8859-1 non ASCII characters are replaced again by their HTML entities equivalent (in the French doc for example)   

Re: svn commit: r1793922 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/trunk-override-index/docs/manual: index.xml mod/core.xml mod/overrides.xml sitemap.xml style/css/manual.css style/modulesynopsis.dtd style/xsl/commo

Le 27/09/2018 à 21:43, Jacob Champion a écrit : On Thu, Sep 27, 2018, 1:10 AM Christophe JAILLET mailto:christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>> wrote: So, if we want to use either XSLT engine, we should avoid this functionality. I'm not an XSLT expert, but it seems like trying

Re: svn commit: r1793922 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/trunk-override-index/docs/manual: index.xml mod/core.xml mod/overrides.xml sitemap.xml style/css/manual.css style/modulesynopsis.dtd style/xsl/commo

Le 27/09/2018 à 05:46, Jacob Champion a écrit : On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:32 PM Christophe JAILLET mailto:christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>> wrote: Well, after some tests, Xalan needs The choice of 'func' over 'xsl' isn't arbitrary; I've used the name 

Re: svn commit: r1793922 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/trunk-override-index/docs/manual: index.xml mod/core.xml mod/overrides.xml sitemap.xml style/css/manual.css style/modulesynopsis.dtd style/xsl/commo

Le 26/09/2018 à 02:18, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Le 05/05/2017 à 00:53, jchamp...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jchampion Date: Thu May  4 22:53:58 2017 New Revision: 1793922 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793922&view=rev Log: Add an Override Class Index This page pull

Re: svn commit: r1751351 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/programs: htdbm.html.en htdbm.xml

Le 04/07/2016 à 19:19, rbo...@apache.org a écrit : Author: rbowen Date: Mon Jul 4 17:19:08 2016 New Revision: 1751351 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1751351&view=rev Log: Give an example of converting a password file from one format to the other. Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/ma

Re: svn commit: r1793922 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/trunk-override-index/docs/manual: index.xml mod/core.xml mod/overrides.xml sitemap.xml style/css/manual.css style/modulesynopsis.dtd style/xsl/commo

Le 05/05/2017 à 00:53, jchamp...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jchampion Date: Thu May 4 22:53:58 2017 New Revision: 1793922 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793922&view=rev Log: Add an Override Class Index This page pulls in directives that declare an element and groups them by class. T

Re: HTML entities

Le 25/09/2018 à 22:08, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Le 25/09/2018 à 22:04, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Le 25/09/2018 à 10:10, Joe Orton a écrit : On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 08:45:02PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: If java 9+, then have a look at https://lists.apache.org/thread.html

Re: HTML entities

Le 25/09/2018 à 22:04, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Le 25/09/2018 à 10:10, Joe Orton a écrit : On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 08:45:02PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: If java 9+, then have a look at https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/039a5815481ac297931cd08e759a90388a620eb6ea7aaecfcf97457f

Re: HTML entities

Le 25/09/2018 à 10:10, Joe Orton a écrit : On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 08:45:02PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: If java 9+, then have a look at https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/039a5815481ac297931cd08e759a90388a620eb6ea7aaecfcf97457f@%3Cdocs.httpd.apache.org%3E The issue with man pages is

Re: HTML entities

, William A Rowe Jr a écrit : Could this have any impact; LANG=en_US.UTF-8 vs. others' settings for the code page? On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 1:45 PM Christophe JAILLET mailto:christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>> wrote: Le 24/09/2018 à 18:33, Joe Orton a écrit : > On Mon, Sep

Re: HTML entities

Le 24/09/2018 à 18:33, Joe Orton a écrit : On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:43:36AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Try to svn up your docs/manual/build/ subdir, it is a different checkout. Maybe we need to revision that directory with a reference rev under docs/ so we don't actually regress the gene

Re: HTML entities

Hi, what version of java are you using? Can you check if the man pages generated are usable? CJ Le 24/09/2018 à 18:33, Joe Orton a écrit : On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:43:36AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Try to svn up your docs/manual/build/ subdir, it is a different checkout. Maybe we n

Re: svn commit: r1836684 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en

Hi, Le 26/07/2018 à 02:51, cove...@apache.org a écrit : Author: covener Date: Thu Jul 26 00:51:41 2018 New Revision: 1836684 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1836684&view=rev Log: xforms Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/m

Re: svn commit: r1835751 [1/7] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: mod/ platform/ programs/ rewrite/

Le 12/07/2018 à 20:56, Lucien Gentis a écrit : html.fr files were generated, but . . not versionned ; so I had to make a "svn add" for each of them. Doesn't Build.sh automatically add them to the svn repos after having created them ? I don't think so. In addition, there's still a problem

Re: svn commit: r1835751 [1/7] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: mod/ platform/ programs/ rewrite/

Le 12/07/2018 à 17:30, lgen...@apache.org a écrit : Author: lgentis Date: Thu Jul 12 15:30:52 2018 New Revision: 1835751 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1835751&view=rev Log: Adding html files after doc rebuild ; why did I have to do that ? New xml.fr files (r1835738) generate new html.

Re: svn commit: r1834255 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

(cross post to doc for an already wider audience :) ) Hi, I personally think that we should push these translations. I've google translated some of them, in each language, and they look great. Should we wait for a formal review by a native speaker, I fear that they will still wait on trunk for

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Still have to check things, but apparently, setting:         UTF-8     in style/lang/en.xml lets Java9 generate correct man files. But it's bed time for now:). CJ Le 24/04/2018 à 22:06, Rainer Jung a écrit : A result from a very partial test that I can't move on currently: I tried Ja

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Le 24/04/2018 à 22:10, Rainer Jung a écrit : Am 24.04.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Rainer Jung: A result from a very partial test that I can't move on currently: I tried Java 9 using a recent ant version and removing all the XML/xslt/regep jar files that we have added long ago as well as the boots

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Le 24/04/2018 à 11:24, Ruediger Pluem a écrit : On 04/21/2018 08:36 PM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote: man pages generated by java 8 without Jakarta Oro and without -Xbootclasspath/p look fine. But the one generated by java 9 and 11 are unusable! So unless fixed, I'm -1 on rem

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

man pages generated by java 8 without Jakarta Oro and without -Xbootclasspath/p look fine. But the one generated by java 9 and 11 are unusable! So unless fixed, I'm -1 on removing -Xbootclasspath/p because Java 9 and up break or man page generation. CJ Le 21/04/2018 à 18:08, Eric Covener a

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Le 21/04/2018 à 18:08, Eric Covener a écrit : >> Thanks! >> >> Christophe, would you have some time to test Java 9 and see if the build >> output is good even without Xbootclasspath? I'll try to do the same during >> the next days.. > > I hit a minor snag testing this. > > openjdk8: produces th

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Le 21/04/2018 à 18:08, Eric Covener a écrit : Thanks! Christophe, would you have some time to test Java 9 and see if the build output is good even without Xbootclasspath? I'll try to do the same during the next days.. I hit a minor snag testing this. openjdk8: produces the same output with and

Re: r1828588: permalink in docs

Le 21/04/2018 à 17:56, Eric Covener a écrit : On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Christophe Jaillet wrote: Hi, r1828588 has added permalinks to section and directive-section. Comments if useful or not are welcome before a back port in 2.4.x or a removal from trunk. I noticed today that the

Re: Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Le 20/04/2018 à 07:14, Marion et Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, I've recently upgraded to the Ubuntu 18.04 Beta. In the process, openjdk 9 has been installed and/or the default openjdk in my setup has moved from version 8 to 9. Now, when i build the documentation (./build.sh),

Issue building the doc with openjdk 9

Hi, I've recently upgraded to the Ubuntu 18.04 Beta. In the process, openjdk 9 has been installed and/or the default openjdk in my setup has moved from version 8 to 9. Now, when i build the documentation (./build.sh), I get: -Xbootclasspath/p is no longer a supported option. Error: Cou

Re: r1828598 and r1828599: tool to ease syntax highlight upgrade in prettify.js

Le 07/04/2018 à 19:00, Christophe Jaillet a écrit : Hi, keeping up to date directives lists for syntax highlight in prettify.js can be tricky. I've tried to ease the process. The 2 commits in the subject line add a way to generate the needed list with the syntax expected by prettify.j

r1828588: permalink in docs

Hi, r1828588 has added permalinks to section and directive-section. Comments if useful or not are welcome before a back port in 2.4.x or a removal from trunk. CJ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org F

r1828598 and r1828599: tool to ease syntax highlight upgrade in prettify.js

Hi, keeping up to date directives lists for syntax highlight in prettify.js can be tricky. I've tried to ease the process. The 2 commits in the subject line add a way to generate the needed list with the syntax expected by prettify.js. It also gives some information on where to put theses stri

Re: Tidying up 2.0/2.2 doc refs

Le 21/02/2018 à 17:18, William A Rowe Jr a écrit : > I observed > in our generated http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/, but not in > the 2.0/ 2.2/ pages. > > Should the same apply to all historical 2.0 and 2.2 docs pages? > > Their canonical page links are already correct (-> docs/current/). > +1

Re: svn commit: r1805630 [1/30] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

Hi, Surprised by the size of the update for just a Few french xml files updated, I've looked randomly in the updates done. All files I've checked have the paragraph describing the directives in English instead of French. The other parts of the document (i.e. non-directive paragraph) are still

Re: conflict number two

Le 26/06/2017 à 20:48, Rich Bowen a écrit : On 06/26/2017 02:37 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 10/06/2017 à 18:10, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Hello again, rewrite/flags.xml -2.4 : . . . In 2.4.26 and later, you can limit the escaping . . . rewrite/flags.xml - trunk : in : . . . In

Re: conflict number two

Le 10/06/2017 à 18:10, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Hello again, rewrite/flags.xml -2.4 : . . . In 2.4.26 and later, you can limit the escaping . . . rewrite/flags.xml - trunk : in : . . . In 2.4.10 and later, you can limit the escaping . . . in : sentence "This flag is available in versio

Re: svn commit: r1795906 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS server/request.c

Hi, Looks like doc should be updated accordingly. Especially, the paragraph stating that: "For example, the current implementation does not contemplate the possibility of having a section inside another one (the inner will be ignored). " A compatibility note should be also added to tell th

Question about r1584417

Hi, in https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/en/rewrite/flags.html#flag_b, there is a note about a new behavior in 2.4.10+. However, this note is not present in the 2.4.x documentation. This was added in trunk in r1584417 but apparently never backported. Should it be or should the trunk doc on

Re: mod_ssl.xml

Hi, fixed in r1792336. CJ Le 11/04/2017 à 23:15, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Oops, correct. I didn't notice that mod_ssl.html.en was older than the xml file. Sorry about that. CJ Le 11/04/2017 à 12:28, Lucien Gentis a écrit : SSLOCSPNoverify and SSLOCSPResponderCertificateFile direc

Re: mod_ssl.xml

20:17, Marion & Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, Apparently what Lucien refers too is trunk specific. However, there is still one reference to 2.5 in SSLCARevocationCheck in the 2.4 branch of mod_ssl.xml. CJ Le 10/04/2017 à 19:10, Luca Toscano a écrit : Hello Lucien, 2017-04-08 17:

Re: mod_ssl.xml

Hi, Apparently what Lucien refers too is trunk specific. However, there is still one reference to 2.5 in SSLCARevocationCheck in the 2.4 branch of mod_ssl.xml. CJ Le 10/04/2017 à 19:10, Luca Toscano a écrit : Hello Lucien, 2017-04-08 17:38 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis mailto:lucien.gen...@un

Question about prettify.js

Hi, I was looking at 'docs/manual/style/script/prettify.js' in order to update the list of the directives used for syntax highlight in the doc. How ever, I have a question. At line 920, in PR_TAG, why is there: Proxy\b Why is there a \b for this tag only? Is it really useful? The whole regex

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

But (not directly related), in the same frame, under "Directives", some directive names are between < and > and some are not. See for example http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/mod_authz_core.html I looked at corresponding XML file, and saw that, for example, Require directive section b

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

Le 28/04/2016 à 09:44, Luca Toscano a écrit : 2016-04-27 14:49 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener >: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Lucien Gentis mailto:lucien.gen...@univ-lorraine.fr>> wrote: > I think of something like "Comments about this doc", since these a

Re: svn commit: r1734349 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/howto: access.html.en access.xml.fr access.xml.meta

Le 17/03/2016 à 21:35, André Malo a écrit : * André Malo wrote: * Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 10/03/2016 06:28, jaillet...@apache.org a écrit : Should prettyprint be tweaked to handle it? (I've seen that the version we use is not the same as the latest available

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

Le 24/04/2016 à 23:18, Luca Toscano a écrit : New version just committed, examples: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_lua.html https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/event.html Luca You could help even more bug-report with something like: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.

Re: Doc translation: what about a new workflow?

Le 18/04/2016 14:56, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Le 18/04/2016 13:32, Rich Bowen a écrit : Converting the docs to use po files would be an enormous undertaking. So while I'm not opposed to it, per se, I'd have a number of questions. I think Christophe didn't tell about converting the docs to .po

Doc translation: what about a new workflow?

Hi docs@, a few weeks ago someone, a discussion [1] has started about using a web based application in order to translate our documentation. The proposal was about Transifex [2]. Another tool that looks similar is provided by the Apache Foundation itself: https://translate.apache.org/ It wor

Re: Proposal: add a permanent "Bugfix checklist" section to all manual pages

Hi, I don't think it would be the right place for that. When I'm looking for some doc, I'm not looking for changelog or bug reports. I expect the doc to be up-to-date and to have compatibility notes when needed (new functionality, changed behavior...) Maybe an entry on the main page (http://ht

Re: svn commit: r1734349 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/howto: access.html.en access.xml.fr access.xml.meta

The issue is related to : text = text.replace(/^(\r?\n\s*)+/g, ''); // Remove leading newlines text = text.replace(/^\s*/g, ''); // Remove leading spaces due to indented formatting text = text.replace(/(\r?\n\s*)+$/g, ''); // Remove ending newlines

Re: Any one doing it?

Great ! Thx :) Maybe jobs for 2.0 could be removed now to save a few cycles? I don't think anyone will update these translations now. CJ Le 04/04/2016 17:47, Takashi Sato a écrit : Now http://people.apache.org/~takashi/translation-status/test.html updates hourly. My cron script transfers JSO

Re: Frédéric Trégon commented on http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_macro.html

This is also reported as PR 58304 (https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58304) CJ Le 02/04/2016 08:26, Marion & Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, mod_macro states that: ~~ If you want to use a value within another string, it is useful to surround

Re: Frédéric Trégon commented on http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_macro.html

Hi, mod_macro states that: ~~ If you want to use a value within another string, it is useful to surround the parameter in braces, to avoid confusion: DocumentRoot "/var/www/${docroot}/htdocs" ~~ As written in the comment below, it

Re: Any one doing it?

Le 24/03/2016 13:59, Eric Covener a écrit : On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Luis Gil wrote: BTW, why the http://people.apache.org/~takashi/translation-status/test.html#trunk has been deleted? in my opinion was a nice way for new people that joins the documentation, as good as looking the BZ pa

Re: svn commit: r1734349 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/howto: access.html.en access.xml.fr access.xml.meta

Le 17/03/2016 21:35, André Malo a écrit : * André Malo wrote: * Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 10/03/2016 06:28,jaillet...@apache.org a écrit : Should prettyprint be tweaked to handle it? (I've seen that the version we use is not the same as the latest available at https://g

Re: svn commit: r1734349 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/howto: access.html.en access.xml.fr access.xml.meta

Le 10/03/2016 06:28, jaillet...@apache.org a écrit : Author: jailletc36 Date: Thu Mar 10 05:28:11 2016 New Revision: 1734349 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1734349&view=rev Log: xforms Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/howto/access.html.en httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/

[RFC] Quoting arguments in examples (trunk vs 2.4)

Le 15/04/2015 19:46, c...@apache.org a écrit : Author: coar Date: Wed Apr 15 17:46:53 2015 New Revision: 1673892 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1673892 Log: Enclose parameters in quotation marks for <{Files,Directory,Location}{,Match}> containers. Le 15/04/2015 20:04, c...@apache.org a écrit :

Re: Accents

Hi, could someone clarify, when building the doc what is controlled by the different following charset: in es.xml: ISO-8859-1 in manual.es.xsl ISO-8859-1 The 2 latter control the output of the generated documents (encoding of the file written (on the first line of the file) and html

Re: es_update

Also please only attach the modified files, not the auto-generated ones. Thanks. CJ Le 10/01/2016 03:50, Luca Toscano a écrit : Hi Luis, the best way to track this change in my opinion is to open a bug using https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/ (File a bug => Apache httpd2 => Documentation). T

Re: Translation ES es.xml

ro de 2016 19:45, Christophe JAILLET mailto:christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>> escribió: Hi, if not already aware of, here is an interesting page when trying to keep in synch a localized version of the doc with the EN version. http://people.apache.org/~takashi/translation-

Re: Translation ES es.xml

Hi, if not already aware of, here is an interesting page when trying to keep in synch a localized version of the doc with the EN version. http://people.apache.org/~takashi/translation-status/test.html#trunk (this page is documented in http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/translations.html) B

tr: RE: Re: CheckBasenameMatc

Hi, See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1557580, See https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44221 for background It was refused for backport because it was changing the default behavior. It could be tweaked to keep the old behavior or dropped completely CJ ___

How to update style/scripts/prettify.js

Hi, the latest added directives are not syntax highlighted in the online doc. See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/en/mod/mod_cache_socache.html for examples. Is there an automatic way to upgrade style/scripts/prettify.js or should it be edited by hand? If an automatic way exists, could

Re: Question about generation of html files that should be marked outdated

Le 11/07/2015 08:03, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, I've updated misc/index.xml in trunk to add a missing link to perf-scaling.html. When building the doc, French (and other) index.xml.fr files are correctly updated: However, the corresponding index.html.fr does not have the

Question about generation of html files that should be marked outdated

Hi, I've updated misc/index.xml in trunk to add a missing link to perf-scaling.html. When building the doc, French (and other) index.xml.fr files are correctly updated: However, the corresponding index.html.fr does not have the usual warning stating that this version may be obsolete.

Re: svn commit: r1674382 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl

Hi, I think that http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/sitemap.html#comment_3895 is also related to this change. CJ Le 17/04/2015 21:46, n...@apache.org a écrit : Author: nd Date: Fri Apr 17 19:46:28 2015 New Revision: 1674382 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1674382 Log: The good thing about stand

Re: directive title

Hi Lucien,   the change is done in trunk http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=1659855 which adds the logic for "before-name". This change has to be backported first.   Best regards, CJ         > Message du 24/03/15 09:05 > De : "Lucien GENTIS" > A : docs@htt

Re: Spanish translation unmaintained

Hi, it is linked at least from: main page --> Subprojects --> Docs At the end, in "Translations", "there's another document about" --> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/translations.html From here, at the end of "

Re: committing problem - trunk branch

Well, French version just arrived :)   Only links are missing in other languages. But sounds logical to rebuild them.   CJ > Message du 19/05/14 13:35 > De : "Lucien Gentis" > A : docs@httpd.apache.org > Copie à : > Objet : Re: committing problem - trunk branch > > Le 19/05/2014 13:03,

Re: committing problem - trunk branch

Hi,   If I remember well the syntax, try :     build.sh all   This will force the re-build of the .en and .ja version as well. Then commit modifications. Links with other languages are within the generated HTML files, so if theses links have to be modified (fr added is this case), it sounds

re: English text not changed and translation reviewer

IMHO, such modifications do not require any additional review. I would say that it is up to you to decide if a change require a review or not.   In all the examples you give, it would be logical to apply them as-is.   Changes such as :    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&sortby=date

Including Appache version number in ?

Hi, on cnline doc, the following comment makes sense to me: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/directives.html#comment_2185 General comment: It would be VERY helpful if the titles of the Directive Index pages included the version number (2.2, 2.4). Then you could pull the right one out o

Re: compatibility tags in 2.4.x tree

Le 05/12/2013 20:45, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Le 04/12/2013 22:06, Eric Covener a écrit : If a module in the 2.4.x doc has inherited a compatibility tag of "first available in 2.3.x", should we [ ] leave it [ ] wipe it entirely [ ] change it to 2.4.0 to give an indication it

Re: compatibility tags in 2.4.x tree

Le 04/12/2013 22:06, Eric Covener a écrit : If a module in the 2.4.x doc has inherited a compatibility tag of "first available in 2.3.x", should we [ ] leave it [ ] wipe it entirely [ ] change it to 2.4.0 to give an indication it's new in this release? I am split between 2 and 3. Personally,