On Apr 25, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
The way I should have phrased it is this: When people who aren't
working on a particular documentation issue try to control how it is
done, it takes the fun out of it for me.
You lost me there. If you define a documentation task as a one-person
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not going to put this to a PMC vote because I think it is
> poisoness to the docs group to let a bunch of people who aren't
> participating in documentation development make decisions on
> inconsequential docs chang
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Petazzoni <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy's idea here is good. Let's setup a design contest, with rules we
> will agree on (keeping the logo, accessibiliy, being xhtml1.1 compliant
> or whatever), and vote on the results. Sum up the vote, and commit the
>
[Ok, let's jump into the ring.]
Hi,
* Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 15:51:29]:
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>> We are all very busy people, and this kind of bike shedding doesn't
>> get us anywhere.
>
> We have a defined process for resolving paint colors
