On 03/09/07, Lucien GENTIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Line 627:
> Probably "Thie hash incorporates" would rather be "This hash incorporates"
This was fixed a few days ago by pctony in r569203. Time for an svn up :-)
> --- Line 632:
> Probably 64^22 instead of 22^64
> (64 possibilities for f
On 02.09.2007, at 17:06, Tim Bray wrote:
On Sep 2, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is valid in XML?
The answer is complicated. One approach is to use which is
kinda ugly but works in lots more places. -T
Yep, quite complicated - it has to do with M
Hi to all,
2.2.x branche
File manual/caching.xml
--- Line 627:
Probably "Thie hash incorporates" would rather be "This hash incorporates"
--- Line 632:
Probably 64^22 instead of 22^64
(64 possibilities for first car, 64 possibilities for second car, . .
.,64 possibilities for 22nd car, so
64
* Graham Leggett wrote:
> André Malo wrote:
> >> Is valid in XML?
> >
> > Given the proper Doctype, sure.
> > However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The
> > char entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs
> > out of the chrome scheme, for whatev
André Malo wrote:
Is valid in XML?
Given the proper Doctype, sure.
However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The char
entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs out of
the chrome scheme, for whatever reason). The doc build system incorporates
* Graham Leggett wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > + rpluem says: Without r571927 the documentation for mod_authn_dbd
> > fails + to build.
>
> I found that while trying to write the documentation, Firefox refused to
> parse the XML file at the start, complaining about the
