Apache HTTP Server 2.0 Documentation Status File.
Last modified: $Date: 2004-11-21 09:35:21 -0500 (Sun, 21 Nov 2004) $
For more information on how to contribute to the Apache Documentation
Project, please see http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/
This document contains only documentation issues r
On 01.08.2007, at 21:32, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
...
Thats fine, but please keep the term reverse-proxy in parallel for
the reasons
stated by others here. It may be a silly and incorrect term, but
in contrast to
gateway in this context it is
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Actually, very few people know what it means, which is why we end up
with so many poorly designed extensions to mod_proxy that really
should be in a separate module called mod_gateway. They have nothing
to do with each other aside from the poor choice Netscape made in
mar
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/01/2007 05:39 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
to say "gateway" in our documentation?
At the minimum, I plan to notate "reverse-proxy (e.g. gateway
server)"
liberal
On 08/01/2007 05:39 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
to say "gateway" in our documentation?
>
>
> At the minimum, I plan to notate "reverse-proxy (e.g. gateway server)"
> liberally throughout the explanation pages of t
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 8/1/07, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any comments before I commit that?
>
> I'm not sure I see the point.
>
> The example is just reiterating the default configuration. But, as
> Vincent mentions, that is needed in some cases and is useful for
> showi
On 8/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the minimum, I plan to notate "reverse-proxy (e.g. gateway server)"
> liberally throughout the explanation pages of the module and guides.
Definite +1 on that.
Joshua.
---
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >>> What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
> >>> to say "gateway" in our documentation?
>
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
> > I am not sure that is a good idea see
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_proxy
>
> read and contrast to
>
>
>>> What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
>>> to say "gateway" in our documentation?
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> I am not sure that is a good idea see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_proxy
read and contrast to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gateway_%28telecommu
On 8/1/07, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any comments before I commit that?
I'm not sure I see the point.
The example is just reiterating the default configuration. But, as
Vincent mentions, that is needed in some cases and is useful for
showing the influences reverse proxies.
On 01.08.2007, at 13:50, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Hi,
What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
to say "gateway" in our documentation?
-1
"Reverse Proxy" is a commonly used term, and I don't see a reason
why we should use something else.
Yep, agreed - please keep it
Hi,
> What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
> to say "gateway" in our documentation?
-1
"Reverse Proxy" is a commonly used term, and I don't see a reason
why we should use something else.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:08:32PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
> to say "gateway" in our documentation?
>
> We could leave one occurrence of "gateway (e.g. reverse-proxy as it was
> previously documented)" per document, fo
On 01/08/07, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any comments before I commit that?
>
It's rather common to see people (especially debian and ubuntu users)
who're getting 401 with ProxyPass because their (idiotic) distro
config includes the inverse of this (Deny from all in Proxy *).
Any comments before I commit that?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
What about removing the
+++
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
+++
In the proxy reserve example?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Index: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
=
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy"
> to say "gateway" in our documentation?
>
> We could leave one occurrence of "gateway (e.g. reverse-proxy as it was
> previously documented)" per document, for clarification.
I am not sure that is a
16 matches
Mail list logo
