At 3:57 PM -0500 2006/11/03, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 11/3/06, Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 3, 2006, at 15:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some proposed definitions:
Order Allow, Deny: Initially a flag for each incoming URL is set
to Deny. Then all Allow directives
On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... lots of problem
Thanks for clarifying the spaces. State's fine.
> "Clients are allowed access if they do not match any Deny directive
or they do match an Allow directive."
This language is a rehash of the old language. Logically,
> ... lots of problem
Thanks for clarifying the spaces. State's fine.
> "Clients are allowed access if they do not match any Deny directive
> or they do match an Allow directive."
This language is a rehash of the old language. Logically, it's correct but
difficult to read.
Whereas, "Then
On 11/3/06, Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 3, 2006, at 15:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here are some proposed definitions:
>
> Order Allow, Deny: Initially a flag for each incoming URL is set
> to Deny. Then all Allow directives (i.e. "Allow foobar.org") are
> applied follow
On Nov 3, 2006, at 15:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some proposed definitions:
Order Allow, Deny: Initially a flag for each incoming URL is set
to Deny. Then all Allow directives (i.e. "Allow foobar.org") are
applied followed by all Deny directives regardless or which order
t
On 11/1/06, Chris Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I (again) banged my head against Order today.
So did I a couple of months go.
> Is there a meaning to 'before'
Regardless of whether the word 'before' is removed or revised. I find the
entire definition diff
