Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
> I don't have a strong objection, too. But isn't it enough just
> navigating people to post to docs@httpd.apache.org rather than
> creating a new list?
>
I was going to suggest this as well... bugs@ people just cc'ing docs.
Either way, I don't mind having a seperate list eith
* Joshua Slive wrote:
> The manual is really only usable if you apply a very particular
> configuration to it, as suggested in the sample configs:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/conf/extra/h
>ttpd-manual.conf.in?view=markup
>
> The SetEnvIf and RedirectMatch combine
> > > I understand your reasoning, but I'd prefer not. I don't think there
> > > are enough doc bugs to justify another list. As an alternative, we
> >
> > Currently that are about 5% of all bugs (just used my link below with
> > and without component value). And the reason to create a new list i
On 6/29/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> I understand your reasoning, but I'd prefer not. I don't think there
> are enough doc bugs to justify another list. As an alternative, we
Currently that are about 5% of all bugs (just used my link below with
and with
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> I understand your reasoning, but I'd prefer not. I don't think there
> are enough doc bugs to justify another list. As an alternative, we
Currently that are about 5% of all bugs (just used my link below with
and without component value). And the reason to create a new li
On 6/29/06, Vincent Deffontaines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings,
The 2.2.2 documentation files seem to be tidied as in 2.0, ie, play with
Type Maps to negotiate content with clients, all translated versions of
a given file living in the same directory.
However, the hypertext links seem to
On 6/29/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just spoke with some people of the httpd-docs project and found out
that they are either not subscribed to bugs@httpd.apache.org or do
not have time to look through the mails. I fully understand this as
1. Most stuff is not about documentat
I just spoke with some people of the httpd-docs project and found out
that they are either not subscribed to bugs@httpd.apache.org or do
not have time to look through the mails. I fully understand this as
1. Most stuff is not about documentation.
2. bugs@ is a high volume list.
First question: Is
Greetings,
The 2.2.2 documentation files seem to be tidied as in 2.0, ie, play with
Type Maps to negotiate content with clients, all translated versions of
a given file living in the same directory.
However, the hypertext links seem to point the translated files into
non-existent directories. For
