CSS media="print"

2002-09-06 Thread André Malo
* André Malo wrote: > yep. I'm currently working on some "pretty printing" CSS. so, created a version... you may review it ;-) please note: it's not designed to replace the current 100pc-loose style. I personally would like to add this style to the other ones. If so, there's a patch for common.x

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: 'Description' in the directive should be the same blue style as the other field titles (e.g. 'Syntax', 'Default', 'Context' etc). The proper way to fix this is to add a "Description" section to directive-dict and module-dict, and then provide a link like all the othe

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:25 PM 9/6/2002, Rich Bowen wrote: On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote: > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. This looks really great, people. ++1 ... this is terrific! Nit: how about two more little nits... 'Description' in the directive should be the same

Re: Antwort: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/css manual .css

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry to disturb your euphoria, but http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/directives tries to serve me the japanese version of the document. Two points: 1. As I mentioned, that is not a supported URL. The URL for that document is http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/d

Antwort: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/css manual .css

2002-09-06 Thread Michael . Schroepl
Hi Joshua and Andy, >> should we consider to move the xml docs to another directory? For >> example, if you request >> , you get at least in >> Mozilla the xml document which will be transformed but misses all the >> definitions from external docu

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Rich Bowen
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Rich Bowen wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:05:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > > > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > > > > > > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice.

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Rich Bowen
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:05:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > > > > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. > > Great job guys! This deserves an announcement

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual index.html.en

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
Ian Holsman wrote: aren't all these HTML files autogenerated now ? I'm just wondering if they belong in CVS at all anymore Ideally, No. (Although that particular one is not auto-generated, the majority are.) There are a couple reasons they are in CVS: 1. To make the release-manager's job easier.

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
Rich Bowen wrote: Nit: On the files in howto/ the top left "Back" link takes one to a directory listing. I suppose the right thing to do is make an index page in that directory, and I always sort of assumed there was one, although I don't know why I thought that. Yes, a howto/index.xml should be ad

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/css manual.css

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
André Malo wrote: attached a patch for manual.css, that merges the double defined sections and removes the CSS validator warnings. Also adjusted the sidebar top position (it's dependant on font-size). Got it. 3. Try out a funny shade of brown for . What'd'ya think? +1 from me ;-) Yes, it's pretty

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Rich Bowen
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote: > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. This looks really great, people. Nit: On the files in howto/ the top left "Back" link takes one to a directory listing.

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
WoW ! My Compliments ! Dw. On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote: > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. > > Still lots of work to do, of course. > > Joshua. > > > -

Re: Ready to commit the new docs :-)

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
André Malo wrote: * Joshua Slive wrote: Could you do me a favour and send this build change to the list as a diff. done ;-) Got it. Thanks. I didn't test it to see if it fixed the problem I was seeing, but we'll know before long. Joshua. ---

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:05:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. Great job guys! This deserves an announcement as well as a front-page httpd.apache.org piece. -aa

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES

2002-09-06 Thread André Malo
* Erik Abele wrote: >> Modified:.CHANGES >> Log: >> Lots of people contributed to this new style, but André was primarily >> responsible for the design and implementation, so he deserves some >> credit. The /design/ (excepting the sidebar) was primary developed by Gernot Winkler...

Re: html help manual

2002-09-06 Thread David Shane Holden
Joshua Slive wrote: In fact, we should probably create a dist/docs/ directory were we can place various documentation distributions. Sounds good to me. Shane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-m

Re: Ready to commit the new docs :-)

2002-09-06 Thread André Malo
* Joshua Slive wrote: > Could you do me a favour and send this build change to the list as a diff. done ;-) > You might also consider resending any other changes that got missed. > There's been so much going on that a few things obviously slipped > through the cracks. yep. I'll check it. nd --

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Indraneel Sarkar
Good job. -Indu >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/6/2002 9:05:42 AM >>> The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. Still lots of work to do, of course. Joshua. -

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread rbb
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote: > > > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. > > Still lots of work to do, of course. > > Well done, gentlemen! It d

Re: New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Joshua Slive wrote: > The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ > Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. > Still lots of work to do, of course. Well done, gentlemen! It does look quite good. --Cliff

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/css manual.css

2002-09-06 Thread André Malo
Friday, September 6, 2002, 2:54:15 AM, slive wrote: > Modified:docs/manual/style/css manual.css > Log: > A few little changes to the css. I don't consider these "final". > More tweaking welcome. attached a patch for manual.css, that merges the double defined sections and removes the

Re: Ready to commit the new docs :-)

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
André Malo wrote: please, please take a look at the build.xml at . I realized another ant caching problem (posted one or two days before...) and fixed that by modifying the build.xml. Could you do me a favour and send this build change to the list as a di

Documentation: mod_actions and security (long ...)

2002-09-06 Thread Michael . Schroepl
Hi all, I have a problem. It will touch Apache documentation and security aspects, so I hope this may be the place to discuss about it. I would like to ask what I should do, and how the Apache documen- tation (about handlers as well as about security) in the future might possibly cover the issue

Re: html help manual

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
David Shane Holden wrote: Here's the html help manual I posted a while back, which includes the recently committed docs rehaul. http://cvs.apache.org/~dpejesh/manual.en.chm Lemme know if something like this is worthy of being included in cvs and if anybody would actually use it or not. I think i

New style is now live

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
The new style is now live on http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ Congrats to everyone who worked on it. I think it looks very nice. Still lots of work to do, of course. Joshua. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

Re: printing the new style

2002-09-06 Thread André Malo
* Joshua Slive wrote: > It would probably be a good idea to provide an alternate stylesheet > for printing, although I don't know how that will interact with the > media="all" designator that we are using to prevent Netscape 4 from > reading the stylesheet. yep. I'm currently working on some "pre

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/xsl common.xsl directiveindex.xsl manualpage.xsl moduleindex.xsl synopsis.xsl

2002-09-06 Thread Yoshiki Hayashi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > erikabele2002/09/05 16:06:17 > > Added: docs/manual/style manual.sv.xsl >docs/manual/style/css manual-loose-100pc-b.css > manual-loose-100pc.css manual-loose-90pc-b.css > manual-loose-90pc.css

printing the new style

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
[excerpting from an unrelated conversation] On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Martin Kraemer wrote: > I like the layout too. However, it needs minor overhaul because it > prints badly, and on the second look, you'll see that in a page like > http://test.perlig.de/apdoc/manual/urlmapping.html > the right colum

Re: html help manual

2002-09-06 Thread Erik Abele
> Von: Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Antworten an: docs@httpd.apache.org > Datum: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:27:35 -0400 (EDT) > An: > Betreff: Re: html help manual > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, David Shane Holden wrote: > >> Here's the html help manual I posted a while back, which includes the >> recently

Re: html help manual

2002-09-06 Thread Rich Bowen
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, David Shane Holden wrote: > Here's the html help manual I posted a while back, which includes the > recently committed docs rehaul. > > http://cvs.apache.org/~dpejesh/manual.en.chm > > Lemme know if something like this is worthy of being included in cvs and if > anybody would a

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES

2002-09-06 Thread Erik Abele
+1, thanks Joshua. I totally missed this for the commits :-( Erik > > slive 2002/09/05 19:15:25 > > Modified:.CHANGES > Log: > Lots of people contributed to this new style, but André was primarily > responsible for the design and implementation, so he deserves some > credit. >

Re: html help manual

2002-09-06 Thread JHKChan
Shane, > http://cvs.apache.org/~dpejesh/manual.en.chm > > Lemme know if something like this is worthy of being included in cvs and if > anybody would actually use it or not. In my opinion, it is worthy to have one just like the PHP manual, as I always keep one in my harddisk. Why I use it beca

Re: Ready to commit the new docs :-)

2002-09-06 Thread Luiz Rocha
> b) style/lang/ pt-br.xml > Is coming the next days, as far as I know Luiz Rocha is working on this. This one is actually done. I just waiting the reviewer to check it. Since my reviewer is a comercial flight pilot, is very likely that pt-br stuff will delay a little to be posted. On the o

Need a build

2002-09-06 Thread Joshua Slive
I'm at a computer that has decided to give java.lang.OutOfMemoryError whenever I try to build the docs, so I'm stuck until tomorrow. If someone can do a clean build and commit all the .html.en, I would appreciate it. Joshua. -

Re: Ready to commit the new docs :-)

2002-09-06 Thread Astrid Keßler
> I will go on and commit the whole stuff in the next hour > if nobody raises any objections. I've commited an update for mod_mime.xml a few minutes ago. But not for the html convertions. I do not want to mix my stuff with your currently work. And I can't do the convertion into the new layout at t

html help manual

2002-09-06 Thread David Shane Holden
Here's the html help manual I posted a while back, which includes the recently committed docs rehaul. http://cvs.apache.org/~dpejesh/manual.en.chm Lemme know if something like this is worthy of being included in cvs and if anybody would actually use it or not. Thanks, Shane