On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Brad Miller wrote:
> >
> > > About the strictness of it, do we want to make sure that everything
> > > already
> > > written validates or do we want to go
> > > back through stuff and modif
~~By the way, Joshua, you like the way I volunteered you to do more work?
~~Heh. What I meant here is that it would be preferable to make things
~~better at this stage than have to redo everything again at a later date,
~~once we are already done.
I will start working on this today. Hopefully I ca
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Brad Miller wrote:
>
> > About the strictness of it, do we want to make sure that everything already
> > written validates or do we want to go
> > back through stuff and modify it (if necessary) to conform to the DTD?
>
> There is no re
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Brad Miller wrote:
> About the strictness of it, do we want to make sure that everything already
> written validates or do we want to go
> back through stuff and modify it (if necessary) to conform to the DTD?
There is no requirement that what has already been written is the
> ~~- Creating a DTD to match the format we are using. I'm a little
skeptical
~~> ~~about this, since we would need to include a big chunk of xhtml, and
~~> ~~I'm not sure how much value it would have in the end anyway.
~~>
~~> We can open up the DTD so that it will accept anything between cer
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > > wincvs.com
> >
> > It's wincvs.org.
> >
> > > Wincvs is a pain to get set up, and the menus are moderately
> > > unintuitive, but once you have it set up, it is not hard to use.
> >
> > FWIW, I've had no en
