Re: Possible workflow [was: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation]

2013-01-14 Thread RGB ES
2013/1/13 Regina Henschel > Hi Ricardo, > > RGB ES schrieb: > > > > > I propose to omit the version number level. As can be seen for ODFAuthors > it is unlikely, that all documents are new written for a new version and > sometimes it is not needed at all. LibreOffice 4.0 is in RC1, but some > do

Re: Possible workflow [was: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation]

2013-01-14 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Rob; > > There is already a Notes template that could be used for relaying that a > feature is new and with with what revision. If you look at section 7.2 of > the Wiki Editing Policy at > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Dash

Re: Possible workflow [was: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation]

2013-01-14 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Rob; There is already a Notes template that could be used for relaying that a feature is new and with with what revision. If you look at section 7.2 of the Wiki Editing Policy at http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Dashboard/Wiki_Editing_Policy#List_of_Existing_Documentation_Template

Re: Possible workflow [was: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation]

2013-01-14 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Ricardo, > > RGB ES schrieb: > >> To start writing the user guide on the Wiki, I propose the following page >> structure >> >> /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide >> /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Guidelines← guidelines for Writers >> /wiki

Re: Possible workflow [was: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation]

2013-01-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
RGB ES wrote: (3) Related question: any time frame for when dev builds with new UI elements will be available? You should CC https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121420 ; I see that Andre has checked in code regularly, but still only on the sidebar branch (which means you should comp

Re: Possible workflow [was: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation]

2013-01-13 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Ricardo, RGB ES schrieb: To start writing the user guide on the Wiki, I propose the following page structure /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Guidelines← guidelines for Writers /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/4_0 ← Index for the user guide for AOO 4.0, follow

Possible workflow [was: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation]

2013-01-13 Thread RGB ES
To start writing the user guide on the Wiki, I propose the following page structure /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/Guidelines← guidelines for Writers /wiki/Documentation/UserGuide/4_0 ← Index for the user guide for AOO 4.0, following the proposed TOC.(1) (In a

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-10 Thread RGB ES
Hi, 2013/1/10 Guy Waterval > Hi all, > Hi Ricardo, > > 2013/1/8 RGB ES > > > 2013/1/7 Rob Weir > > > > > > Snip > > > > > b) define a table of contents or rough content outline for each core > > > deliverable > > > > > > > We can start from this draft > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/con

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-10 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi all, Hi Ricardo, 2013/1/8 RGB ES > 2013/1/7 Rob Weir > > > Snip > > b) define a table of contents or rough content outline for each core > > deliverable > > > > We can start from this draft > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Details+on+Scenario+3#DetailsonScenario3-

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-09 Thread RGB ES
2013/1/9 Rob Weir > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, RGB ES wrote: > . > . > . > > > > We can start from this draft > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Details+on+Scenario+3#DetailsonScenario3-ProposedTOC > > > > maybe focusing on the first two chapters for now. > > > >

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, RGB ES wrote: . . . > > We can start from this draft > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Details+on+Scenario+3#DetailsonScenario3-ProposedTOC > > maybe focusing on the first two chapters for now. > > So how would we map that to wiki pages? I a

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 01/09/2013 01:24 AM, Guy Waterval wrote: Hi all, 2013/1/8 Andrea Pescetti Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, RGB ES wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/**About/Legal/EN/US/**IntellectualProperty/** Permissions/Default.aspx#ERG

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi all, 2013/1/8 Andrea Pescetti > Rob Weir wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, RGB ES wrote: >> >>> http://www.microsoft.com/**About/Legal/EN/US/**IntellectualProperty/** >>> Permissions/Default.aspx#ERG

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, RGB ES wrote: >>> >>> >>> http://www.microsoft.com/About/Legal/EN/US/IntellectualProperty/Permissions/Default.aspx#ERG >>> "4. Do not use screen shots that contain third-party content." >

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, RGB ES wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/About/Legal/EN/US/IntellectualProperty/Permissions/Default.aspx#ERG "4. Do not use screen shots that contain third-party content." This and number 2 "Do not use portions of screen shots" are problematic. I do

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, RGB ES wrote: > 2013/1/7 Rob Weir > >> We have a small set of volunteers right now, but it should be easy to >> attract more if we do a "Call for Volunteers". This worked very well >> for translators, marketing and QA, for example. But what we learned >> there i

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
What is the document title? General Concepts? Getting Started? Introduction to AOO? We can start from this draft https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Details+on+Scenario+3#DetailsonScenario3-ProposedTOC maybe focusing on the first two chapters for now.

VB: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread louise forsberg
this is a missunderstanding sorry do not understand why this is comeing to me --- Den tis 2013-01-08 skrev RGB ES : Från: RGB ES Ämne: Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation Till: doc@openoffice.apache.org Datum: tisdag 8 januari 2013 13:12 2013/1/7 Rob Weir >  We have a sm

Re: Proposal for Moving Forward with Documentation

2013-01-08 Thread RGB ES
2013/1/7 Rob Weir > We have a small set of volunteers right now, but it should be easy to > attract more if we do a "Call for Volunteers". This worked very well > for translators, marketing and QA, for example. But what we learned > there is that you really need to have a project structure in