hen the
> operating system or the local network does not support them. That genie
> is not going back in the bottle any time soon.
>
> -- Christian Huitema
>
>
> ___
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-priv...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mai
, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:44 AM Christian Huitema
wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2019 8:25 PM, nalini elkins wrote:
> > > Similarly, putting DNS in user space allows for immediate adoption
> > of DNSSEC and privacy enhancements, even when the operating system or
> > the local network
advance notice: "i aim to misbehave."[1] that is, _i am
> on-path, and i intend to interfere._ why on earth the IETF decided to
> equate dissidents (of whom there are tens of thousands, all of which
> need full VPN's not just DoH for actual safety) with bots (of which
> there are tens of millions), and set up a war between end users and
> network operators, i will never understand, or try to. now, we fight.
>
> --
> P Vixie
>
>
--
Thanks,
Nalini Elkins
President
Enterprise Data Center Operators
www.e-dco.com
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
11, 2019 at 8:37 PM Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy <
tirumaleswarreddy_ko...@mcafee.com> wrote:
> Please see inline [TR]
>
>
>
> *From:* dns-privacy *On Behalf Of *nalini
> elkins
> *Sent:* Monday, March 11, 2019 11:05 AM
> *To:* Paul Vixie
> *Cc:* Stephen Farre
o what is done in California on ballot initiatives. When
we get our
voting pamphlet, it tells us for each issue, what impact a pro or con vote
will have
on various aspects such as increased taxes, and so forth.
Nalini
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:42 PM Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
> nalini elkin
cked one list for this.
> In the meantime...)
>
> On 11/03/2019 20:43, nalini elkins wrote:
> > impact assessment that certain changes such as
> > DoH and TLS1.3 will have on enterprises,
>
> TLS1.3 will, I expect, noticeably improve security for an awful
> lot of enterpr
Paul,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:03 AM Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 15:36:36 UTC Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:55:18AM +0530,
> > nalini elkins wrote
> >
> > a message of 202 lines which said:
> > > The q
gure to bypass such controls, but that neither of those should ever be
> the default configurations.
>
> If the results allow you to do what you want/need, and also allow others
> to do what they want/need, everyone should be happy enough with the result.
>
> Can we at least ag
