Thanks, Paul
My comment:
https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-top-level-domain-string-for-private-use-24-01-2024/submissions/eckert-toerless-27-02-2024
Summary of Submission:
I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
and ICANN shou
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:48:22PM +0100, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> > I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
> > and ICANN should not finaliz
Me ? No.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:22:43PM -0500, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Joe Abley said:
> >Hey,
> >
> >Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
> >geschreven:
> >
> >> I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use o
Ben Kaduk (SEC AD) was wondering about the appropriateness of a hardening
suggestion
in draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-29. Let me translate this into
mDNS, even though its about GRASP, but IMHO for the purpose of this issue
its equivalent:
Node wants to discover on a LAN a particular se
.
>
> Of course there always has to be a trust establishment process, like BRSKI.
>
> I???m sure that something similar can be done with anima.
>
> > On Oct 25, 2020, at 15:25, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> >
> > ???Ben Kaduk (SEC AD) was wondering about the ap
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:05:42PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:59 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > The networks where i am worried are not home networks,
> > but something like an office park network, where supposedly each
> > tenant (company) should have
Toerless
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:11:33PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 1:05 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:59 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> >> The networks where i am worried are not home networks,
> >&
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 04:09:41PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> >> If the anwer of the experts is "do not harden implementations of existing
> >> protocols",
> >> but only improve protocols or eliminate security risks from underlays, i
> >> think
>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 04:39:10PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > And the question from the AD was what could be done. So, do you have any
> > implemention suggestion ? Are there any sugestions for mDNS ?
>
> There are no s
Sorry, haven't been following this group for a long time, so
please excuse if answers to these questions have been discussed in before:
a) What documents beside RFC3258 are describing any uses/procedures
for having DNS servers use an anycast address to receive and respond to
requests ?
b)
Thanks, Patrick, inline
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:10:19AM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > a) What documents beside RFC3258 are describing any uses/procedures
> > for having DNS servers use an anycast address to receive and respond to
> > requests ?
>
> Dunno, but something tells m
Hah! i am using that NTP one, but it didn't come to mind when asking the
question.
Have to read up on that AS112. Thanks
Thanks!
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:09:18PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Toerless Eckert wrote:
> >
> > b) How common are deployments in which the inf
12 matches
Mail list logo
