Hi all,
Just a quick note (as requested by Peter Thomassen) to say that we (
https://glauca.digital) have implemented
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping for our registrar’s CDS bootstrapping.
Thanks,
Q
--
Any statements contained in this email are personal to the a
What might make more sense is to define a range (via standards action) for
private use, as there is in other DNS parameters.
--
Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are
not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically st
Moin,
In general I SUPPORT this draft progressing to an RFC, baring one
(hopefully) easily addressable nit:
§ 2.3 should be clearer on if a scheme is RRTYPE specific, or always has
the same meaning in the protocol.
Good work from the authors, looking forward to seeing this deployed!
Q
--
Dearest fellow DNS sufferers,
There was not enough time at the dnsop WG for me to get to the mic, so I'm
posting what I wished to say here. My issue with the draft is on its
recommendations for registry lock, particularly:
"Automated DS maintenance SHOULD be suspended when a registry lock is set
fwiw, I'm still in favour of chartering a new WG for Domain Connect
--
Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are
not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated.
AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at
