Reviewer: Patrick Mevzek
Review result: Ready with Nits
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft
draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-dane-01
The DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
Reviewer: Patrick Mevzek
Review result: Not Ready
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The DNS
Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as they pass through
IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose
of the review
Reviewer: Patrick Mevzek
Review result: Ready with Nits
I reviewed draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06 which was current version at time of
review.
The document, updating RFC 8109, does not introduce changes in the DNS protocol
or specifications, but gives guidance on best operational behavior for a
r
Reviewer: Patrick Mevzek
Review result: Ready
I have reviewed previously draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-05
at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/pSqTcLhunIAULyz4v8ByXhp7cWg/
It was "Ready with Nits".
Looking at version 06 now,
the major points I raised have now been addres
Reviewer: Patrick Mevzek
Review result: Ready with Nits
Hi,
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of
Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency
Title: Clarifications on CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC Consistency
Reviewer: Patrick Mevzek
Review result: Ready with Nits
I agree with previous dnsdir review of version 03 at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/fylDZkZJo58eRV_eL7UqxI2fccE
including that
