Paul Vixie wrote:
>if the names are global then they will be unique and DNS itself will handle
>the decision of how to route questions to the right authority servers.
>...
>first i hope you can explain why the simpler and existing viral DNS paradigm
>(all names are global and unique) is unaccepta
Linda Dunbar wrote:
>Thank you very much for suggesting using the Globally unique domain name and
>having subdomains not resolvable outside the organization.
>I took some of your wording into the section. Please let us know if the
>description can be improved.
Thanks. I think that covers a reaso
Yes, I believe that suggestion is much stronger and expresses the intent and
meaning better.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: DNSOP On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 1:19 PM
To: linda.dun...@futurewei.com
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: [DNSOP] DNS for Cl
Warren Kumari wrote:
> Over on the BIND-Users list there is currently a discussion of
> fema.net (one the "Federal Emergency Management Agency" domains)
> being DNSSEC borked
> (https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2014-October/094142.html)
>
> This is an example of the sort of issues that a
From: Paul Vixie
ultimately what matters is whatever works. if cloudflare decides to stop
answering QTYPE=ANY then it would take all million or so qmail customers
complaining to cloudflare's NOC to get cloudflare to change its mind. i don't
think that's going to happen, for a number of reason
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Wouters [mailto:p...@nohats.ca]
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Paul Vixie or Morizot Timothy S wrote:
>
> [not sure of the quoting in this message]
>
The comments you referenced were all Paul's. I tried to make that clear i
or is it as good as performing
validation at the client. But it is a solid first step with real security
benefits. And it's a step that can be followed and built upon with further
enhancements later.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Weaver [mailto:nwea...@icsi.berkeley.edu]
Sent
