On 8/7/15, Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 8/7/15, 10:29, "DNSOP on behalf of Wendy Seltzer"
> wrote:
>
>>You might find https://spec.torproject.org/ helpful as a listing of
>>various tor specs and design documents, if you prefer that to a git
>>repository.
>
> That's the site I've been using.
>
What d
On 9/1/15, John R Levine wrote:
>>> In any event, from the point of the DNS, a reservation that just says
>>> don't resolve .onion would be quite adequate.
>>
>> You may consider the privacy leakage issues of no consequence. Others do
>> not.
>
> Please do not put words in my mouth. They're
On 9/1/15, John R Levine wrote:
>>> Please do not put words in my mouth. They're important but they're not
>>> a
>>> DNS problem.
>>
>> I think reasonable people might disagree?
>
> Not really. It's a layering issue.
It is a design flaw from an era when fax machines roamed the earth.
>> In my
On 9/1/15, John R Levine wrote:
> Speaking of which ...
>
>> It is a critical flaw that fails open. The DNS continues to work but
>> users are put into harm's way. ...
>
>>> Also please keep in mind that we're having this discussion because of
>>> design tradeoffs in the implementation of Tor. If
On 9/2/15, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
> John R Levine wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Tor is one approach to query security that seems to work pretty well
>> give or take side channel leakage. Dunno if there are any others, but
>> it is clearly a very hard problem, and not one we're going to solve
>> any time soo
On 9/3/15, John R Levine wrote:
>> Until the invention of quantum computers, we can protect data from
>> being instantly available to most of these groups most of the time.
>
> Aw, come on. There are root servers in China.
>
I'm much more worried about the root servers run by people who also
dep
On 11/29/15, Philip Homburg wrote:
>>.onion was the chosen approach precisely because nothing else but lookup
>> and s
>>ubsequent routing has to change; there are no other application-level
>> decision
>>s about .onion, and that's a feature. HTTP still works, TLS still works
>> (once
>>you can ge
Hi,
On 11/29/15, Philip Homburg wrote:
>>> The purpose of the domain name system is to name things. We have IP
>>> addresses and we want to refer to them using names. We do the same thing
>>> with mail domains, etc.
>>
>>That is not the sole purpose - we use DNS for keys, for time stamps,
>>for d
SM:
> Hi Stephane,
> At 09:53 01-12-2013, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> RFC 6761 does not say anything about that. Do note a TLD has already
>> been registered under RFC 6761, .local. Some people may say that, when
>> you are a big US company, just hijack the TLD, deploy the software,
>> and the IE
--- Forwarded message --
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 17:25:10 -0800
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt
> To: Jacob Appelbaum , Alec Muffett
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-appelbaum-dnsop-onion-t
10 matches
Mail list logo
